Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > >> I think that a clear statement from the kFreeBSD porters about this
> > >> would help concluding this debate.
> > > Does anybody have anything to say about this?
> > I don't think the purpose of your question is concluding the debate, I
> > think it just tries to enforce your point of view by presenting your
> > goal as an accepted premise.
> It still looks like an interesting question to me, and attributing
> second motives to it is just bad rethoric.
>
> But the lack of answers looks quite like a "no".
Now _that_ is bad rhetoric.
Hell, just look in other branches of this thread, especially those on
the debian-bsd list. It's not as this thread is ignored by the
kfreebsd porters, even before you explicitly asked for comments.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
`- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110721193146.gw29...@sym.noone.org
