ifupdown: /lib/freebsd/route -> /sbin/route

Package: ifupdown Version: 0.7.43 Severity: minor Tags: patch As of freebsd-net-tools 9.0+ds1-2, it is no longer necessary to use /lib/freebsd/route wrapper. Please find attached patch to use /sbin/route directly (this removes a warning during boot). Thanks! -- Robert Millan diff -ur ifupdown

Re: /sbin/route

2011/10/25 Petr Salinger : >> And experimental's ifupdown can actually work with freebsd native tools >> so there might be need for some idea on how to transition but it should >> be not too hard. > > Does experimental's ifupdown work with both current wrapper

Re: /sbin/route

And experimental's ifupdown can actually work with freebsd native tools so there might be need for some idea on how to transition but it should be not too hard. Does experimental's ifupdown work with both current wrapper (/sbin/route) and freebsd native tool (/lib/freebsd/route) ?

Re: /sbin/route

2011/10/25 Christoph Egger : > Petr Salinger writes: >> Main purpose of route warpper have been to satisfy ifupdown needs. > > And experimental's ifupdown can actually work with freebsd native tools > so there might be need for some idea on how to transition but it should > be not too hard. Alrea

Re: /sbin/route

Petr Salinger writes: > Main purpose of route warpper have been to satisfy ifupdown needs. And experimental's ifupdown can actually work with freebsd native tools so there might be need for some idea on how to transition but it should be not too hard. Regards Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: /sbin/route

I propose that /sbin/route is replaced with FreeBSD route. Then we could keep the wrapper elsewhere in case it's useful (e.g. to shell users). Yes please, /sbin/route should be FreeBSD route, /sbin/ifconfig should be FreeBSD ifconfig. The same hold for mount, idea is that the bas

/sbin/route

Hi, I've recently found (and filed) two bugs that expose severe problems with route management on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD: Bug#645502: isc-dhcp-client: Resync dhclient-script with FreeBSD version Bug#646221: openvpn: /sbin/route wrapper doesn't provide FreeBSD CLI as expected In bot

Bug#646221: /sbin/route wrapper doesn't provide FreeBSD CLI as expected

Package: openvpn Version: 2.1.3-2 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd OpenVPN is mostly broken on GNU/kFreeBSD because it attempts to use /sbin/route with FreeBSD command-line interface. /sbin/route is a compatibility wrapper which attempts to map

Bug#605723: marked as done (freebsd-net-tools: /sbin/route wrapper does not support IPv6)

Your message dated Tue, 07 Jun 2011 06:33:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#605723: fixed in freebsd-utils 8.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #605723, regarding freebsd-net-tools: /sbin/route wrapper does not support IPv6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#605723: freebsd-net-tools: /sbin/route wrapper does not support IPv6

Package: freebsd-net-tools Version: 8.1-2+b1 Severity: important Tags: ipv6 User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Mats Erik Andersson wrote on the debian-bsd mailing list: > The script /sbin/route is really a tie-down for GNU/kFreeBSD. > It is completely tied to IPv4