[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If we ever get a replacement libc that would really work as
> replacement... on such system GNU claims would become much weaker. Not
> that there was a serious chance of that happening - drop-in replacement
> of glibc on Linux would be a lot of work and so far none of th
Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 05:04:26PM +1000, matthew green wrote:
> > actually, i hadn't, but there wasn't very much there besides the
> > fact that people found it was xdm reading /dev/mem and a small
> > patch for debian to enable /dev/random (i'd sug
2 matches
Mail list logo
