FYI
Original Message
Subject: Bug#683833 closed by Julien Cristau (Bug#683833:
fixed in xorg-server 2:1.15.0.901-1)
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:00:14 +
From: ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Reply-To: 683...@bugs.debian.org
To: Robert Millan
This is an au
Hello,
On 01/04/14 08:16, Jan Henke wrote:
> after the recent discussions about FTBFS due to gcj, I would like to
> discuss the future of gcj in general here. The thread at [1] brings it
> pretty much to the point I think, while gcj will not go away, there is
> basically no further development to
Am 01.04.2014 16:03, schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> Jan Henke (2014-04-01):
>> Package: debian-installer
>> Version: 20140316
>> Severity: important
>>
>> Using the ISO file from
>> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/kfreebsd-amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-kfreebsd-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso
>> the
Jan Henke (2014-04-01):
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: 20140316
> Severity: important
>
> Using the ISO file from
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/kfreebsd-amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-kfreebsd-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso
> the DHCP client fails to set the network configuration. (
Hi folks,
after the recent discussions about FTBFS due to gcj, I would like to
discuss the future of gcj in general here. The thread at [1] brings it
pretty much to the point I think, while gcj will not go away, there is
basically no further development to be expected upstream. Together with
the (
5 matches
Mail list logo