David Prévot writes:
>> -
>> +> arch="alpha;amd64;armel;armhf;i386;ia64;mips;mipsel;powerpc;sparc;s390;s390x">
>
> I would be much more comfortable if we could use a syntax à la
>
>
>
> because the hardcoded list of non-kfreebsd will bite us as soon as we’ll
> add a new Linux architecture.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 23/03/2013 12:10, Baptiste a écrit :
> Control: tags -1 patch
Thanks Baptiste for working on this issue.
> +
I guess this was meant to be “kfreebsd-amd64” instead of “amd64”.
> -
> + arch="alpha;amd64;armel;armhf;i386;ia64;mips;mipsel;pow
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi maintainers,
> Please find attached a *kind* of patch to apply on 3 files :
> - release-notes/release-notes.ent
> - release-notes/en/issues.dbk
> - release-notes/en/upgrading.dbk
I'm updating the patch because I succesfully built the RN for both
kfreebsd-i386 &
kfreeb
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the src:rcpp package:
#697032: rcpp: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: #error "Rcpp::Timer not supported by your OS."
It has been closed by Dirk Eddelbuettel .
Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package freebsd-utils
rpc.lockd from freebsd-nfs-common/testing has a bug (#664812)
preventing it from starting. Steven found the root cause for this a
few days ago and
5 matches
Mail list logo