Re: gcj-4.4-jdk misses jni_md.h on kfreebsd platform

2011-04-19 Thread Ondřej Surý
Just a quick note, the difference in gcj version between successful and unsuccessfull build is 4.4.5-9 vs 4.4.5-14 Ondřej Surý On 20.4.2011, at 0:59, Ondřej Surý wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 23:34, Matthias Klose wrote: >> On 04/19/2011 11:11 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote: >>> >>> reopen 621878

Re: gcj-4.4-jdk misses jni_md.h on kfreebsd platform

2011-04-19 Thread Ondřej Surý
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 23:34, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 04/19/2011 11:11 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote: >> >> reopen 621878 >> reassign 621878 gcj-4.4-jdk >> retitle 621878 gcj-4.4-jdk misses jni_md.h on kfreebsd >> affects 621878 +db4.6 db4.7 db4.8 db >> thank you >> >> Dear Debian GCC Team please look

Re: gcj-4.4-jdk misses jni_md.h on kfreebsd platform

2011-04-19 Thread Matthias Klose
On 04/19/2011 11:11 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote: reopen 621878 reassign 621878 gcj-4.4-jdk retitle 621878 gcj-4.4-jdk misses jni_md.h on kfreebsd affects 621878 +db4.6 db4.7 db4.8 db thank you Dear Debian GCC Team please look at http://bugs.debian.org/621878, it looks like jni_md.h header is missing t

Re: Buildd maintainer wanted for kfreebsd-*

2011-04-19 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Aurelien Jarno writes: > Thanks a lot for maintaining the kfreebsd-* buildds for the last years. > I am taking back the maintenance for now, but a new maintainer is of > course still needed. I would offer to take over there. However I would prefer to if handing over could happen in early

Re: Buildd maintainer wanted for kfreebsd-*

2011-04-19 Thread Super Biscuit
Go to IRC. --- On Tue, 4/19/11, Aurelien Jarno wrote: From: Aurelien Jarno Subject: Re: Buildd maintainer wanted for kfreebsd-* To: "Super Biscuit" Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Date: Tuesday, April 19, 2011, 6:22 PM On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:54:54AM -0700, Super Biscuit wrote: > > Why no

Re: Buildd maintainer wanted for kfreebsd-*

2011-04-19 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:54:54AM -0700, Super Biscuit wrote: > > Why not delegate parts of it to others? Could you precise your idea? Cyril is asking for a new buildd maintainer and I am doing exactly the same. > --- On Tue, 4/19/11, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > From: Aurelien Jarno > Subject:

Re: Buildd maintainer wanted for kfreebsd-*

2011-04-19 Thread Super Biscuit
Why not delegate parts of it to others? --- On Tue, 4/19/11, Aurelien Jarno wrote: From: Aurelien Jarno Subject: Re: Buildd maintainer wanted for kfreebsd-* To: "Cyril Brulebois" Cc: debian-wb-t...@lists.debian.org, debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Date: Tuesday, April 19, 2011, 5:24 PM On Tue, Ap

Re: Buildd maintainer wanted for kfreebsd-*

2011-04-19 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 01:20:14AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, Hi, > I'd be very grateful if somebody could take over my buildds: > 2 * kfreebsd-amd64: fano, fasch > 2 * kfreebsd-i386 : field, finzi > > Having some kfreebsd-* background would surely help (that's why I'm > Cc-ing debian