On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 23:34, Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> wrote: > On 04/19/2011 11:11 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote: >> >> reopen 621878 >> reassign 621878 gcj-4.4-jdk >> retitle 621878 gcj-4.4-jdk misses jni_md.h on kfreebsd >> affects 621878 +db4.6 db4.7 db4.8 db >> thank you >> >> Dear Debian GCC Team please look at http://bugs.debian.org/621878, it >> looks like jni_md.h header is missing there which is causing FTBFSes >> for dbX.Y packages. >> >> You can find failed build logs here: >> >> >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=db&arch=kfreebsd-i386&ver=5.1.25-2&stamp=1302733739 >> >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=db&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=5.1.25-2&stamp=1302733541 > > is this a kfreebsd issue?
Version 5.1.25-1 built fine: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=db&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=5.1.25-1&stamp=1297388366 Version 5.1.25-2 started to fail on kfreebsd-{amd64,amd32}. The buildd failures on ia64, mips, s390 and sparc are of different nature. The error from 5.1.25-2 build is: libtool: compile: gcc -c -I. -I../src -I/usr/include/tcl8.5 -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include -Wall -g -O2 -I/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include -fno-strict-aliasing ../lang/java/libdb_java/db_java_wrap.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/db_java_wrap.o In file included from ../lang/java/libdb_java/db_java_wrap.c:137:0: /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include/jni.h:52:20: fatal error: jni_md.h: No such file or directory The same line compiles with lots of warnings, but compiles. So something must have changed on gcj side between the two builds which broke it. > looks more like you are assuming that the default > version of gcc matches the one for gcj. please reassign back. Could you please elaborate? Are you trying to say that calling: > gcc -c -I. -I../src -I/usr/include/tcl8.5 -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT > -I/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include -Wall -g -O2 > -I/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include -fno-strict-aliasing > ../lang/java/libdb_java/db_java_wrap.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/db_java_wrap.o is wrong when gcc is different version than gcj? Well the build log say gcc-4.4 and gcj-4.4-*, so there should be nothing wrong. O. -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org>
db_5.1.25-1..2.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
