Sam Hartman wrote:
Hi. I'm not sure I see any conclusion to the apt thread. Does anyone
have apt-get working (instead of segfaulting) using the apt in the
distributed chroot? If so, how? If not, does anyone have apt working
using other builds?
Hi Sam,
unfortunatly not yet. I th
> "utsl" == utsl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
utsl> On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:47:40PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> Hi. I'm not sure I see any conclusion to the apt thread.
>> Does anyone have apt-get working (instead of segfaulting) using
>> the apt in the distributed chroot
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:47:40PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> Hi. I'm not sure I see any conclusion to the apt thread. Does anyone
> have apt-get working (instead of segfaulting) using the apt in the
> distributed chroot? If so, how? If not, does anyone have apt working
> using other builds
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 03:12:30PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Jeremy" == Jeremy C Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jeremy> It all depends on your (or RMS's) personal definition of
> Jeremy> "freedom". Definitely BSD websites promote free software
> Jeremy> -- in fact, they
> "Jeremy" == Jeremy C Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeremy> It all depends on your (or RMS's) personal definition of
Jeremy> "freedom". Definitely BSD websites promote free software
Jeremy> -- in fact, they encourage the use of their code in
Jeremy> proprietary, closed-sou
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> Apart from that a lot ofthings come from GNU and they they deserve
> credit, there is also another reason. It's spreading the words of
> freedom. The GNU website talks about freedom and why software should be
> free. I don't see this on the big "Linux"
So, there was mention of tackling PAM after shadow gets working.
Speaking as PAM maintainer, I will not accept new patches for
portability to the Debian PAM 0.72 packages. We're already too far
out of date with regard to upstream. If patches are submitted I'll
ask people to redo them after I
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 12:08:00AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > I've now uploaded the web page to http://debian-bsd.sf.net and am
> Why do you host it at a site which runs non-free software and locks in
> users? For the people who don't know what'
Hi. I'm not sure I see any conclusion to the apt thread. Does anyone
have apt-get working (instead of segfaulting) using the apt in the
distributed chroot? If so, how? If not, does anyone have apt working
using other builds?
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 05:48:48PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 02:46:29AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > That approach gets rid of a lot of hassles associated with upgrading the
> > > sources, and allows people to rebuild their kernel and core system. You
> > > just
On 2002-01-17 18:56:23+0100, Wessel Dankers wrote:
> Summarizing: the "GNU/" addition to "GNU/$KERNEL" is finally starting to
> make sense.
Summarizing the summary: I vote for Debian GNU/$BSD.
Is anyone counting these "votes" anyway? ;)
--
Wessel Dankers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CD-ROM server needs
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 02:35:04AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> I've added a webpage (http://debian-bsd.sourceforge.net/why.html) with
> some reasons why I think this project is worthwhile. Does anyone have any
> objection to any of the reasons listed or have any suggestions for extra
> ones tha
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 01:13:41AM -0800, Michael Goetze wrote:
> I assume there will be some people who will want to port the GNU C library to
> Debian */*BSD if it ever becomes successful, anyways. Of course, that will
> open
> a whole new can of worms... but that's in the future.
I'm busy with
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 02:46:29AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > That approach gets rid of a lot of hassles associated with upgrading the
> > sources, and allows people to rebuild their kernel and core system. You just
> > pull the new sources from CVS, and use the scripts to build debs. A lot
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 12:08:00AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> I've now uploaded the web page to http://debian-bsd.sf.net and am
> redirecting people there from the old location.
Why do you host it at a site which runs non-free software and locks in
users? For the people who don't know what's
Title: 될수밖에 없는 영어 - 아이러브잉글리쉬
YTN 뉴스 보기
16 matches
Mail list logo
