RE: Musings on Darwin ...

2000-04-05 Thread Brent Fulgham
> -Original Message- > From: Dan Potter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 2:26 PM > To: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Musings on Darwin ... > > > I recall waay back on Apr 05 when Brent Fulgham wrote: > > > Darwin is now purportedly available for i3

Re: Musings on Darwin ...

2000-04-05 Thread Dan Potter
I recall waay back on Apr 05 when Brent Fulgham wrote: > Darwin is now purportedly available for i386 (or rather, it compiles > under i386 but may not yet quite work). [...] I was having similar thoughts myself. The important thing is that Darwin is a Mach-based microkernel, much like Hurd. I won

Re: Musings on Darwin ...

2000-04-05 Thread Filip Van Raemdonck
On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 12:52:33PM -0700, Anant Kabra wrote: > Whats the license on Darwin? Is it DFSG compatible? > > -- Anant > Last time I checked it wasn't. Regards, Filip

RE: Musings on Darwin ...

2000-04-05 Thread Brent Fulgham
I'm not sure. As I recall there might have been an issue related to notifications (under Section 2.2 You May Deploy Covered Code, provided... c) if You Deploy Covered Code containing Modifications made by You, inform others of how to obtain those Modifications by filling out and submitting the

Re: Musings on Darwin ...

2000-04-05 Thread Anant Kabra
Whats the license on Darwin? Is it DFSG compatible? -- Anant --- Brent Fulgham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Darwin is now purportedly available for i386 (or > rather, it compiles > under i386 but may not yet quite work). > > Hmmm. > > Darwin also uses the Debian packaging system. > > Hmmm. >

Musings on Darwin ...

2000-04-05 Thread Brent Fulgham
Darwin is now purportedly available for i386 (or rather, it compiles under i386 but may not yet quite work). Hmmm. Darwin also uses the Debian packaging system. Hmmm. Darwin is based on FreeBSD and NetBSD. Hmmm. Darwin is based on Mach, which is also part of our Hurd Port. Hmmm. Perhaps we