PPP(oe) problem and installation report

2004-06-17 Thread Viti Davide
Hi, I'll soon have an ADSL in my flat and I'm playing with d-i on a Windoze machine running VMware just to get confident with the installation process in order to get Debian up and running ASAP. I saw a few threads discussed lately on this list about PPPoe and from what I got it should be possibl

Re: Re: PPP / PPPoE / APT sources

2004-06-18 Thread Viti Davide
>>The "businesscard" is the "50Mb CD image" and does NOT have the complete >>system to be installed from CD ROM. You need network to use that one. >Yes, but it contains the ppp-udeb package which allows setting up >a PPPoE connection. Could you please tell me how? I tried (I reported it a few po

Installatio report. base-config problems

2004-07-01 Thread Viti Davide
Hi, I tried to install sarge using tc1 (sarge-i386-netinst.iso) on my new laptop (Toshiba A30-303) with pppoe. I'm not a guru (I'm a newbie) Everything went pretty smooth; when I got to configuring apt sources in the 2nd stage and I pressed "back" and exited from the installation system. Run pppoe

RE: Installatio report. base-config problems

2004-07-02 Thread Viti Davide
Seems like #256112 is the source of all my problems: after googling seems like it causes problems with gnome, kde, mozilla, konqueror, firefox and other browsers. I'll go and fix the loopback interface Hope this helps Davide >-Original Message- >From: Viti Davide >Sent:

More infos for D-I testers

2004-07-06 Thread Viti Davide
Hi, I thought that it could be useful both for developers and for testers if the d-I images were associated to a file explainig which features testers should focus on: occasional testers would probably send installation reports as usual without paying too much attention to this file, but more exper

Expect for d-I tests

2004-07-08 Thread Viti Davide
Hi, I'd like to play with expect in order to drive an automatic installation; last night I managed to do a full install of tc1 using qemu. Can anyone point me in the right direction (links, examples...whatever)... My first goal would be to start an installation with "linux26". Is not very clear to

RE: Expect for d-I tests

2004-07-08 Thread Viti Davide
>> Is not very clear to me how to interact with d-I via qemu. > >I suspect it will be easier with bochs, as qemu is missing a >feature. Do you know if is in the whishlist of future qemu releases? >bochs can use the 'term' console driver, and then use >normal stdin and stdout as the console. T

Re: Bug#249766: PCMCIA 3c589B ethernet card NOT DETECTED

2004-05-19 Thread Viti Davide
Hi, I have a Toshiba Satellite 1690CDT and I've had so many troubles with a PCMCIA Digicom Palladio Dongless ethernet card. To get it working with Woody it took me a long time. I tried almost every version of the installer so far at sometimes it was properly detected and installed and sometimes not

Hostname not updated

2004-10-08 Thread Viti Davide
Hi, I tried the pre-rc2 installer on my laptop (Toshiba a30-303); apart from the bug #265183 regarding my adsl connection, I had problems starting the Gnome session. During installation I was asked to choose a hostname and I accidentally choosed the default one ("debian"). Later on, when given the

RE: Request for a DFB version of libcairo2

2006-06-07 Thread Viti Davide
Hi Dave, > I've repackaged cairo completely and built cairo 1.1.6 > experimental along with udebs just against directfb. The > result is sitting in http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/ > for now. I tested that the regular debs seem to work but I > can't test the udeb. > > Let me k

RE: Request for a DFB version of libcairo2

2006-06-08 Thread Viti Davide
> The "regular" and "-directfb" lib and -dev packages would need to be > co-installable on a regular Debian system. > > Sorry if we did not make this clear enough. > > Cheers, > FJP > > (Anybody please correct me if any of this is incorrect!) That's excatly what I was about to write; I'll rep

RE: Request for a DFB version of libcairo2

2006-06-08 Thread Viti Davide
I could have made it even simpler by saying that "libcairo2-directfb-dev_1.1.6-1_i386.deb" Is the same as "libcairo2-dev_1.1.6-1_i386.deb" apart the compilation flags which select The directfb backend. Davide

RE: Request for a DFB version of libcairo2

2006-06-08 Thread Viti Davide
Hi Sven, > Don't we need also a -fPIC version of the library, in order > to the mklibs reduction ? Yes we do, but I'd play safe and leave it as next step. Getting out working (u)debs asap would means we could start Pushing for the gtk+directf set of packages. Just my 2 cents Davide

RE: Request for a DFB version of libcairo2

2006-06-09 Thread Viti Davide
> Indeed, there is no need for two -dev packages, is there? Why would you force ppl interested only in the x11 version to install the directfb one as well? > Only two pc files and two libs, right? No: include files differ. Davide

RE: Request for a DFB version of libcairo2

2006-06-09 Thread Viti Davide
> Say what? The source is the same... But compiled with different flags > that's what I said about three mails ago. Then what you said three mails ago is wrong. > AFAICT there shouldn't be any difference > beween the headers because they are the same headers. Are there any? Have you checke

RE: Request for a DFB version of libcairo2

2006-06-09 Thread Viti Davide
> > Have you checked it before stating they're the same? > > I don't have access to a linux machine now to test that. Have > you checked? Do you think I would have said that without having checked before? You don't need a linux machine to check that; grab the -dev.deb and -dev.udeb in the link p

RE: Request for a DFB version of libcairo2

2006-06-09 Thread Viti Davide
> On 6/9/06, Viti Davide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do you think I would have said that without having checked before? > > You haven't made it easy to let us understand that you did. Here's a snippet of the message you're referring to: "> Only two

RE: [directfb-dev] [g-i]GTK 2.8.18 with directfb support packages [was:Re: [g-i] Graphical installer and PPC systems]

2006-06-20 Thread Viti Davide
> I have been fighting the whole Sunday to make a patch to the debian > package gtk+2.0 so that it produces also a library with the directfb > backend. why? The Gnome team will support the D-I team in producing the gtk+-directfb packages. > Until now I have maneged to make a separate set of targe

RE: [directfb-dev] [g-i]GTK 2.8.18 with directfb support packages [was:Re: [g-i] Graphical installer and PPC systems]

2006-06-20 Thread Viti Davide
> > why? > > The Gnome team will support the D-I team in producing the > > gtk+-directfb packages. > > I wanted to do so... and if I do it right, their work will be less. I'm not sure they need help on packaging; I might be wrong but I don't think the gtk is not ready because of technical probl

RE: EXPERIMENTAL: new status pages using new "levels" for translation status

2006-06-23 Thread Viti Davide
Hi Christian, Following a couple of links I noticed a minor problem in [1]; In the table on top of the page, "Percent world population" row, Both Etch beta 3 and post beta 3 : "56 to 50%". Shouldn't that be 56 to 60% ? Ciao, Davide [1] http://people.debian.org/~bubulle/d-i/i18n-doc/languages.h

RE: [g-i] new screenshots available

2006-06-23 Thread Viti Davide
> > Version: 20060501cvs-2 > > we use the udeb where many glyphs were removed for reducing memory > > footprint > > By anychance did you remove the glyphs of conjunts? :-) Do they fall on any of the following ranges? ranges="$ranges u0400:u052F" # Cyrilic ranges="$ranges u0530:u058F" # Armenian

Bug#375402: FW: [directfb-dev] [Fwd: Bug#375402: g-i: weird touchpad behavior]

2006-06-27 Thread Viti Davide
FYI, Regards, Davide -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Claudio Ciccani Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 12:01 PM To: Attilio Fiandrotti Cc: directfb-dev@directfb.org Subject: Re: [directfb-dev] [Fwd: Bug#375402: g-i: weird touchpad behavior] A

RE: Work on tasksel's language tasks

2006-06-28 Thread Viti Davide
Hi Christian, > I'm opened to any suggestion of things to add to language > tasks. I already have a few ideas: > > -suggest to add ttf-dejavu in the desktop task. Actually, > this very good font is the basis of the graphical installer > as it is suitable for many languages While we're on th

RE: GTK+ 2.8.18 experimental debs/udebs

2006-06-29 Thread Viti Davide
> Please test it extensively yourself first and let us know the > results. Wider testing is only useful if there are no obvious issues. > While on the subject, I've written some notes (see bottom of [1]) about changes Involved when building test images based on the new packages. It's my intentio