Bug#145627: boot-floppies: boot floppies load buggy base-config package

2002-05-02 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Package: boot-floppies Version: 20020502 Severity: critical There was a critical bug in base-config 1.33.17. I just attempted to install a system using the boot floppies I found in the normal place on debian.org, and encountered the bug. I fetched the fixed base-config 1.33.18, and that works f

Bug#145627: boot-floppies: boot floppies load buggy base-config package

2002-05-02 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
reassign 145627 ftp.debian.org thanks Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think you want to reassign this to ftp.debian.org then; the boot > floppies just use whatever's in woody. I have asked aj to force the new > base-config into woody, but he has not yet replied. Ok. They don't get m

Bug#145635: boot-floppies: boot-floppies could use an ftp client

2002-05-02 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Package: boot-floppies Version: 20020503 Severity: wishlist In the recent case where I needed to fetch the working base-config because the archive held a buggy one, I encountered a rather pathetic difficulty: there is no easy-to-use way to download a file from the base system. (I could have confi

Re: Bug#97755: [PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system

2001-05-19 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For example what display manager we will choose: gdm, kdm, wdm or xdm? > Maybe gdm, because it provides session menu, but it looks to me a little > buggy. I'm giving this only as an example. Surely there will be > conflicts. What does it mean that g

Re: Need Debian Developer as Consultant

2001-05-25 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Understand Thomas that I hurt my chances of venture capital to hire > developers full time if I tell too much. They are afraid that other > companies are lurking waiting to steal ideas. You know what these wankers > are like. Oh, I am sensitive to that. You certain

Re: Need Debian Developer as Consultant

2001-05-25 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am not lazy and I will get through all my emails and reply to everyone who > mailed me. > * Consultant talks to me on the phone, over IRC, on ICQ, or faxes me. > Telephone bills my expense. No travel required, you can be anywhere in the > world. > * I will pay you

Re: The powerpc port should be removed from etch release candidates ...

2006-04-27 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The debian installer netinst and businesscard images are now broken > since almost a month, and since the d-i team kicked me out as > powerpc maintainer, and removed my d-i commit rights, there is no > way for me to help fix this, and this clearly demostra

Re: The powerpc port should be removed from etch release candidates ...

2006-04-27 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, i will not go this way. If the social problem doesn't solve itself in the > near future, i am much more proposing to host a forked version of the d-i and > some key packages, and fix stuff there. So you are now declaring that you will not submit the p

Re: The powerpc port should be removed from etch release candidates ...

2006-04-27 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, who is working on the powerpc d-i port ? Only Colin Watson, > but his duties in ubuntu don't leave him enough time to do the work > properly, and it was always me in the past who ended up doing the > work nobody else cared about. I don't understand

Re: The powerpc port should be removed from etch release candidates ...

2006-04-27 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, i am raising an alarm earlier, so people who care about powerpc will have > time to act, and will not stay believing all is fine, and end with a mess 8 > month from now or such. Hrm, perhaps I misunderstood your subject line. I understood it not to b

Re: The powerpc port should be removed from etch release candidates ...

2006-04-27 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It should be removed from the actual etch release candidate until the > situation improves. The etch release candidate guidelines include a working > and well supported d-i port, and this criteria is not fullfilled, so powerpc > should be dropped from pote

Re: The powerpc port should be removed from etch release candidates ...

2006-04-27 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, i was kicked out of the d-i project. That is sad. Even so, i was > willing to help, and discovered this not because they told it to me, > but because i was blocked from helping. They had to do it meakly in > my back. What I heard you say was that you

Re: The powerpc port should be removed from etch release candidates ...

2006-04-27 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am not willing to send in patches now. I was kicked out of d-i a month ago. Gotcha. I don't understand why, however. I lack write access to all kinds of things, but I still send in patches. It sounds like you care about powerpc support, so I find it

Re: The powerpc port should be removed from etch release candidates ...

2006-04-27 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have seen Frans claim various times about patches and changes i > was proposing that it will never be applied anyway because i > proposed it, and he didn't thrust me. Do you really thing that in > the light of this me sending in patches just to have them

Re: The powerpc port should be removed from etch release candidates ...

2006-04-27 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But nobody cared to inform the powerpc users, who where trying to use the > broken images on machines the april 1 build could not work. I'm a powerpc user, and I wasn't trying to use the broken images. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

Re: The powerpc port should be removed from etch release candidates ...

2006-04-27 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The question is : Did frans have a ethic reason to remove my commit > access, or did he do it only out of spit to get ride of me ? I have > seen many argue that since i resigned from being 'the d-i powerpc > porter' it was ok for him to remove those commit

It's "the Hurd"

2000-08-04 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Section 1.3 of the installation manual asks "What is Hurd?" The usage of "Hurd" is almost always with a definite article; the question should be "What is the Hurd?" (and throughout that section as well, "Hurd" should be replaced with "the Hurd" almost everywhere it occurs) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

a suggestion

2000-08-04 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
I received a business-card-sized CD-ROM of slink boot floppies from linuxcare, perhaps you've seen it. It was a pretty nifty item. I would relish covenient clear instructions on how to make such a CDROM. Right now, we have complete images, and we have floppies, but no instructions for making a

oh...

2000-08-04 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
and I'm not subscribed to debian-boot, so I won't be able to see replies if you don't CC them to me directly. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: a suggestion

2000-08-04 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I would relish covenient clear instructions on how to make such a > > CDROM. Right now, we have complete images, and we have floppies, but > > no instructions for making a simple boot-floppies-only CDROM. > > As would I. 3.5" CD-R media is becomin

Re: a suggestion

2000-08-04 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > > > Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > I would relish covenient clear instructions on how to make such a > > > > CDROM. Right now, we have compl

Re: Minimized Debian bootable CD

2000-08-11 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm very interested in your success since I also tried to use debian-cd. > Unfortunatly debian-cd puts a lot of constrains on the configuration of > what's included (i.e. all required, important and standard packages, > etc.). I'd like to know how you circu

Re: It's "the Hurd"

2000-08-12 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > > > Section 1.3 of the installation manual asks "What is Hurd?" > > > > The usage of "Hurd" is almost always with a definite article; the > &

Re: first weekly debian-installer status report

2000-11-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [ For those folks in debian-devel who don't know, the debian-installer > project is an effort to write a new Debian installer, with a modular > package-based design somewhat like Debian itself. Docs at > http://cvs.debian.org/debian-installer/doc/ ]