Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
See description of issue below.
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version: "Jessie" - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-1 20130819-05:32
Date:
Machine: Dell Inspiron 1545
Partitions:
Base System Installation Checklist:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 07:13:55AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk):
>
> > I think fdisk should not warn about alignment of extended partitions,
> > since they contain nothing but a partition table.
>
>
> So this bug should either be closed, or reass
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20130613
I'm setting up a new install, using guided partitioning with LUKS
encryption.
I have a 750GB hard disk (a somewhat old machine!) and I've twice
restarted it thinking that it had hung on the screen which says
"Erasing data on SCSI1 ...".
I then realised
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 08:22:29PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> control: severity -1 wishlist
> control: tags -1 +confirmed
Oh, gosh, I didn't realise *how* slow: it's taken about 36 *hours*
(!!!) to wipe the 750GB disc.
That is not really going to endear Debian to people trying it for the
first
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 01:31:38AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Oh, gosh, I didn't realise *how* slow: it's taken about 36 *hours*
> > (!!!) to wipe the 750GB disc.
> >
> > That is not really going to endear Debian to people trying it for the
> > first time or even not for the first time; the
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 02:32:40AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Julian Gilbey (2013-09-01):
> > On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 01:31:38AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Like the 'Cancel' button?
>
> I did write more than that, I quoted a changelog entry, which
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 02:03:09PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sonntag, 1. September 2013, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I don't want to play bug-severity games, but I'd rate this higher than
> > wishlist, as 36 hours to even begin the installation is unreasonable.
>
ould probably be held.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://people.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see
-* package maintainers, but has the desired
function.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://people.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://w
ntainers should mess with this part of CVS" or by making
> dak/dinstall look at the actual contents of the latest task- packages).
> I suspect using CVS'll be easier and at least as good though.
Fair enough; you have the code.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
ar to Depends,
Recommends and Suggests, but with slightly different rules.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://people.debian.org/
k-* packages themselves
containing a Tasks: field in place of Depends and Recommends fields.
> And while we're at it, we could implement Reverse-Suggests too, and
> finally satisfy RMS..
What about "Enhances"? Or is it not yet up to it?
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
id that it must have a different set
of rules. Remember that the Task: header will be under the control of
a strictly limited number of packages.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary,
rwarded message from Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
-
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:01:33 +0200
From: Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Subject: Re: Obselete packages possibly preventing migration to testing
To: Julian Gilbey
CC: ftpmas...@debian.org
Hi Julian!
Am 23.10.2011 17:17, schrieb Julian Gilbe
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_alpha1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 21 March 2010 17:00
Machine: Dell Vostro 430
Partitions: Didn't get that far in the
Oops, forgot the attachment.
Julian
installation-files.tar.gz
Description: Binary data
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 02:07:53PM +1000, Geoff Simmons wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:17:37PM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Detect network card:[E]
> [...]
> > The key issue seems to be the message in dmesg:
> > tg3: Problem fetching invariants of chip,
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version: amd64 stable (5.0.4)
Date: February 2010
Machine: Dell Core i5 machine
Partitions:
Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders
Units = cylinders o
Forwarding to the bug report...
Julian
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 02:26:48PM -0500, Manuel E. Gutierrez wrote:
>
> Hi Julian,
>
> This bug is still around...
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574888
>
>
> Cheers, Manuel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@
19 matches
Mail list logo
