When I attempted to install with the 2003-12-31
netinst CD, not long after I did the language
selection, I got an error message like this:
"The integrity check for failed. It is most
likely corrupt. Aborting."
After that, I was able to reboot and get back to my
old system.
varies a bit. On one
--- Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James J. Ramsey wrote:
> > When I attempted to install with the 2003-12-31
> > netinst CD, not long after I did the language
> > selection, I got an error message like this:
> >
> > "The integrity chec
--- "James J. Ramsey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > James J. Ramsey wrote:
> > > When I attempted to install with the 2003-12-31
> > > netinst CD, not long after I did the language
> > > s
--- "James J. Ramsey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Have you tried writing a new CD using a different
> CD
> > burner?
>
> Nope. I only have access to one CD burner (which has
> so far n
Package: installation-reports
Version: 20031231
Okay, *now* I'm doing the proper installation report
that I should have done before.
Debian-installer-version: From
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/,
dated 2003-12-31, used sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Date: Morning of Jan. 1
Package: installation-reports
Version: 20040101
(Another proper installation report that I should have
done before.)
Debian-installer-version: From
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/,
dated 2004-01-01, used sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Date: Morning of Jan. 2
Method: Booted
Package: installation-reports
Version: 20040103
Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-netinst.iso from
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/20040103/
Also applies to the copies of sarge-i386-netinst.iso
from
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/
dated 2004-01-
--- Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sándor Bárány wrote:
> "After the hardware detection, the install loads the
> frame buffer module (even there was a vga=normal
> parameter specified on the kernel line), which fails
> (the hardware is so old, there is no frame buffer
> support). This
--- Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Unless we find something badly wrong with them, the
> installation images
> currently in testing for i386, and the Jan 3rd i386
> isos will be the
> final images used for beta 2 for i386.
I tested the Jan 3rd i386 netinst iso. It still
doesn't work w
--- Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James J. Ramsey wrote:
> The
> installer
> > seems to filter out some of the parameters that
> are
> > passed at the boot prompt, even though they are
> > standard-issue, documented kernel parameters. In
> > B?r?
--- Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James J. Ramsey wrote:
> > I tested the Jan 3rd i386 netinst iso. It still
> > doesn't work with older ATAPI CD-ROMs that can't
> > handle DMA, since 1) the standard kernel parameter
> > ide=nodma gets mysterio
--- Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James J. Ramsey wrote:
> > The documentation on expert mode in the
> > INSTALLATION-HOWTO is a little thin, but you
> *seem* to
> > be saying that just to turn off DMA for the
> CD-ROM, I
> > have resort to av
I was advised that to workaround my pet problem of my
CD-ROM's broken support for DMA that I was to use the
expert install. I was told that since the installer in
expert mode prompts me to pass parameters to a module
it is about to load, I can pass the appropriate
parameters to the module that hand
13 matches
Mail list logo
