Dejavu 2.7 has made it into unstable and things are happening on the
font side. I just created a new set of screenshots in [1]; everything
is pretty much the best we can do atm, apart from Arabic / Farsi (see
#374720)
It would be interesting to have some feedback from native speakers; I'd be
partic
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 12:14:51AM +0100, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> Russian (ru) looks very good.
great.
> ...
> That is just a tiny cosmetical issue, nothing important.
thanx for reporting; now that we found a set of fonts to display all
the supported languages, it's important to know what shoul
> Bengali [2] doesn't look 100% okay. Conjuncts are not rendering properly.
we use freefont to display Bengali; quite a few Indic languages are now
supported
from freefont now.
We used Mukti in the past and also had positive feedback with freefont; if you
think
using Mukti would be more appropri
Hi Eugeniy,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 03:18:49AM +0300, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 22 червня 2006 о 03:01 +0200 Davide Viti написав(-ла):
> > It would be interesting to have some feedback from native speakers;
> It looks good for Ukrainian (except bad glyphs for б t
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 08:56:43AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> So, mor ethan screenshots, it would be really good to test a real
> install with a mini ISO image. Going up to the partitioning stage can
> be done on any machine safely as the installer is not destructive
> before it writes down
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 09:20:04PM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> Hebrew looks fine. Thanks.
that's freefont: cool.
I take advantage of the situation...
there are 31 (minor) errors in l1 translations for Hebrew [1] spotted
by the spellchecker: could you please fix those or let us know if
are falso po
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:33:16AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> Yes, freefont has Bengali support. You sent us these [2], [3], [4]
> screenshots using freefonts [8] - which had no rendering problems at
> all.
ah!
> Currently I am using it [9] in Dapper - no rendering problem.
>
> Which version ar
Hi Jamil,
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:46:45PM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> >> Which version are you using?
> >
> >Version: 20060501cvs-2
> >we use the udeb where many glyphs were removed for reducing memory
> >footprint
>
> By anychance did you remove the glyphs of conjunts? :-)
I replaced the st
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 02:16:03PM -0700, Damodharan Rajalingam wrote:
> Tamil characters are not shown properly :-(. What is the font used for Tamil
> (ta)?
TSCu_Paranar contained in ttf-tamil-fonts.
What is wrong with it?
Can you suggest any alternatives?
Davide
signature.asc
Description:
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 09:29:19AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Built, checked and uploaded today.
>
> Thanks a lot for your reactivity and very active maintenance of
> ttf-dejavu, Peter.
Thanx alot to both of you guys!
I'm really glad about dejavu being the default font for g-i:
* quality
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 07:01:14AM -0700, Damodharan Rajalingam wrote:
> Hmm.. TSCu_Paranar is the font which I use in my Debian box and dont
> have any problem with it. Also there was a screenshot sent when Tamil
> was announced a supported language. The tamil font rendering in that
> screenshot
Hi Dave,
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 10:23:38AM -0700, Dave Beckett wrote:
> I've just uploaded cairo 1.1.10 experimental debs to:
> http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/
>
> This should include all the fixes Frans and others mentioned and needed
> for the graphical installer build with g
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 09:03:56PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Package: cdebconf-gtk-udeb
> Version: 0.103
>
> I've tried g-i on my laptop which has an Alps touchpad. The frontend does
> respond to the touchpad, but not correctly.
>
> When you first touch the touchpad, the cursor "jumps" to a posi
Hi Josselin,
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 08:13:13PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Finally, here are the gtk+directfb packages:
> http://people.debian.org/~joss/packages/
I started testing libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb_2.8.18-3_i386.udeb
and got two problems:
- dependency on libtiff4
- dependency in l
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 12:29:45AM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
> I started testing libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb_2.8.18-3_i386.udeb
> and got two problems:
>
> - dependency on libtiff4
> - dependency in libcairo2 (>= 1.0.2-2)
now everything seems to work fine!
both the udeb an
Hi Jamil,
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 02:57:06PM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> Yes there are differences. Please check it, I have marked some problems:
> http://www.ankurbangla.org/images/di_bn_problem.png
I rebuilt a version of the freefont udeb which comments the following
# if ! echo $1 | grep -q B
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 07:21:32PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Junichi sent this to d-devel, but I feel it's relevant for d-boot too :-)
thanx, I got a Macbook today and I'm trying to install Debian on it
First experience ever with an Apple product, so I have no background
with tools / problems
>
Hi Jamil,
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 05:29:55AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> >I also took a screenshot [1]; if you think it's fine I'll file a bug
> >against freefont and hide from Christian :)
>
> Yes, now it looks okay! Btw, it will be better if you can make the
> font size little bigger. :-)
Just
Hi Junichi,
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 07:47:26AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > could you please give more details about this?
>
> # apt-get install refit (when it enters past the NEW queue)
> # gptsync /dev/sda
ok, so first I need to partition the disk on osx and then
install refit inside debia
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 07:47:26AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > Current work around is to reboot into rEFIt and run gptsync, and
> > > then run d-i from CDROM, and then configure the bootloader.
> > >
> >
> > could you please give more details about this?
>
> # apt-get install refit (w
- Forwarded message from Mike Emmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Mike Emmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 14:12:39 -0700
To: Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: directfb-dev
Subject: Re: [directfb-dev] FW: G-I - Test results for mini.iso based on 2.8.18
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 09:42:55AM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> the only thing which needs building, AIUI is cdebconf(-gtk). The
> rest are already ok.
yes, cdebconf-gtk needs the patch below.
The other package which needs to be changed is rootskel-gtk where
src/etc/gtk-2.0/gdk-pixbuf.loaders h
As many of you probably know, dejavu fonts have been chosen as default
font for the graphical version of the debian-intaller (g-i); this
means that 48 of the 64 currently supported languages rely on dejavu
fonts for rendering text.
I've started lurking the dejavu IRC channel and mailing list and g
>I would also wait starting a new request for testing until there is really
>something new to test (last test only just finished after all) and
>providing more specific instructions to testers what to look for and how
>to report issues.
I haven't updated the screenshots yet; I wanted to wait u
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 09:51:13PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> * Weird blue lines between choices when cursor is moved (see [1])
> These blue lines appear and disappear rather randomly when I move the
> cursor over the list.
> ...
> [1] http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i/g-i_2.8.18_display-weirdness.
Hi Aiet,
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 03:53:06PM +0400, Aiet Kolkhi wrote:
> The Georgian fonts in the udeb package are under GPL, so we could
> replace the Georgian portion of Dejavu with the one from Georgian udeb
> packae (BPG Glaho being the best font).
Some people are working on Georgian glyphs w
ATM there are 30+55 errors (suspect variables + level specific errors)
in level1 translations (see [1]).
Languages currently affected:
+---+--+-+
| lang | susp | spec|
+---+--+-+
| bn| | x |
| bs| | x |
| eo| x| |
| fa| x| x |
|
FYI,
regards,
Davide
- Forwarded message from Ben Laenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Ben Laenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 17:25:17 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [DejaVu-fonts] DejaVu fonts 2.8 released
Hi all,
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 12:58:32PM -0300, Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
> I've just fixed the single suspect for pt_BR, which in fact was really an
> error.
>
> Thanks for giving a notice :-)
thanx for fixing it.
Your changes will be reflected on the spellchecker page tomorrow around 11 UTC.
ciao,
Da
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 05:54:47PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > | eo| x| |
> http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/svn/debian-installer/packages/partman/partman-lvm/debian/po/eo.po
> the right partman-lvm.templates file? I downloaded the
>
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 06:39:00AM +0200, Manfred Richter wrote:
> During installation a driver for the ethernet, called sky2, is used.
> After installation this driver is not longer present.
I had the very same problem when trying to install Debian on my
Macbook (which needs the sky2 module as we
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.104+b1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
The problem is easily reproducible on a few languages when running kbd-chooser;
the patch below seems to fix the problem.
Haven't found the exact reason, but looks like the largest number of
padding characters has to be used when com
tags 317354 + patch
thanks
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:19:12PM +0300, Joey Hess wrote:
> Subject says it all, errors display with a blue info bar at the bottom,
> should be red.
The patch belows set the helpline bg colour to red, and the fg colour
to white (see [1])
regards,
Davide
[1] http://ww
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 07:35:57PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> The elilo installer main-menu entry is truncated when displayed.
> The text appears as "Install elilo on a hard dis", when it should be
> "Install elilo on a hard disk".
I just filed #382278 which seems to track down the same problem;
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:37:52PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Initial tests have revealed that we still have some issues to solve before
> Etch is released though:
> - blue lines appear when mouse is moved over select dialogs [1]
The bug was reported upstream:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cg
tags 382697 + patch
thanks
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 09:24:26PM +0300, Nick Niktaris wrote:
> Package: kbd-chooser
> Severity: important
> Tags: l10n
>
>
> While trying netinst.iso etch beta 3 I found that during installation
> selection of the Greek keyboard fails,
> the installer can not contin
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 07:00:05PM -0500, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Please commit it.
Just to make sure no other charsets are left out at compile time,
I searched for the list of charsets explicitely mentioned:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> find /usr/share/keymaps/ -name *.gz -exec zgrep -w charset
{} \; |
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 08:15:48PM +0200, Jerome Lemaire wrote:
> Christian Perrier a écrit :
> >This is VERY likely to be the problem I already reported and which we
> >are aware of when using the graphical installer. This is pretty
The bug you're referring to is #339352 which I closed a few day
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 09:04:56AM +0200, Holger Hoffmann wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> The installer is (almost) perfect! Didn't use Debian 'til yesterday
> because installing was a hassle.
> Minor problem: I selected German as installation language, while the
> umlaute (ä& etc.) showed up corre
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 12:11:37PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > It is, by definition, a bit more invasive and it would be better if
> > someone with all the skills in keyboard/console stuff (such as
> > Alastair, Denis, Eugen) looks at it.
> >
> > I suggest committing the first patch (w
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 02:11:45PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > (1) During installation, on the screen "Benutzer und Passwörter" I
> > tried to enter an umlaut (namely Rüdiger). The Umlaut showed as
> > something else (I think it was ), and could not be removed.
> > Neither nor the left arrow key
Package: kbd-chooser
Version: 1.30
Tags: l10n
non-ascii chars can now be entered in input boxes (tried it with the newt
frontend);
it does now not work on VT2: tested after selecting Italian language / Keyboard.
enabling utf-8 via the following command fixes the problem:
echo -ne "\033%G"
See
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.105
Severity: minor
Input of non-ascii characters does work now; only problem is that when
you enter a non-ascii char, the input line is broken on the right border.
Hitting ^L does not redraw and fix the problem.
The following image shows it:
http://www.webalice.it/z
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 06:33:56PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 06:10:19PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > reassign 384475 cdebconf-gtk
> > thanks
> >
> > Quoting Jens Seidel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > the graphical Debian Installer provides a Screenshot button but I'm
>
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 12:08:38AM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
> I'm sure Frans was meant to fix it with the upload of version 1.30:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/08/msg01034.html
I just remembered the fix for VT2 is contained in rootskel which
was uploaded alon
Hi,
please let ttf-dejavu 2.25-3 migrate to testing.
This version introduces the new ttf-dejavu-mono-udeb udeb needed for having
a shell in the graphical installer.
Thanx in advance,
Davide
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
FYI,
regards,
Davide
PS: Debian package will (hopefully) follow soon
- Forwarded message from Ben Laenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Ben Laenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:28:22 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [DejaVu-fonts] DejaVu Fonts 2.
Hi,
new screenshots using dejavu 2.21 are available at [1] ; there
are no differences with older version of the package.
Details about the content of the newer version of dejavu can be
found in [2].
Regards,
Davide
[1] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots
[2] http://dejavu.source
Hi,
could you please hint current version of ttf-dejavu (2.21-1) into testing?
the package provides also an udeb used by the graphical installer.
TIA,
Davide
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
rtially), support for mips
> would be great!
>
>> == Crash problem when dfbinfo is running in chroot jail.
>> But it works fine without a chroot.
>> --
>> /dev# /usr/lib/directfb-0.9.25/bin/dfbinfo
>
>
>
> Unfort
FYI
regards,
Davide
- Forwarded message from Ben Laenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Ben Laenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 18:33:06 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [DejaVu-fonts] DejaVu Fonts 2.22 released
Hi all,
Today we bring you the 2.22
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 10:57:27AM +0100, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
>
> Daily builds [1] are now based on linux>=2.6.22 and DirectFB 1.0, so could
> please someone recheck wheter this bug, which was reported at the times of
> linux 2.6.18 and DirectFB 0.9.25, is gone or still persists?
>
I first
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 07:40:17AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > I assume this was because the glyphs needed are not in freefont?
>
> Yes. The Ethiopic Unicode Bloc: U+1200-U+1399
just checked and the above range is not in Freefont and Dejavu either
> > Are there any overlaps with the free
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 12:30:38PM +0100, Davide Viti wrote:
> I've prepared a pdf file [1] with all the glyphs provided by the font.
>
> regards,
> Davide
>
> [1] http://alioth.debian.org/~zinosat-guest/ttf-sil-abyssinica.pdf
...and here some screenshots using the font
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 10:14:19AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > which size should we use inside g-i?
> > default fontsize is 9pt but some languages were set at bigger size
>
> I think that it would be bette
Hi Frans,
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 10:35:32PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> I forget why we still have dejavu. Davide: what are the chances of getting
> rid of that?
ttf-dejavu has been the default font used in g-i for awhile now, so if
the question is why we still have freefont, that's because it's
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 10:37:38PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 06 January 2008, Davide Viti wrote:
> However, I would expect that for other fonts just using the freefont Latin
> range would produce perfectly good results (provided the sizing is
> comparable) and especia
Hi Christian,
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 06:00:44PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Otavio Salvador ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > The udeb size goes from 220768 bytes to 183090 bytes
> >
> > Impressive!
>
>
> Im waiting for some ACK by others to propose the strip patch to the
> font main
Hi Eddy,
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 03:39:13PM +0200, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
> Why not do an automatic strip of the font and only *keep* the
> codepoints that are used, based on the existing translations? I know
> this could be too drastic and we run into the risk of loosing glyphs
> if we are not doi
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:29:51AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Especially with Christian's comment that we display a fair number of strings
> that are not even in D-I SVN, this whole idea gets a huge NACK from me as
> it is.
and in the input forms you can type unpredictable chars
signature.asc
Just noticed the list was not CC'ed
regards,
Davide
- Forwarded message from TG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: TG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 08:50:02 +0800
To: Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Debian Installer: Amharic screenshots
Hi
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 08:46:38PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> I just reported a bug against ttf-sil-abyssinica source package, with
> an attached patch, to propose stripping out the Latin range in the
> udeb.
I've created a test image
FYI,
Davide
- Forwarded message from TG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: TG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:07:41 +0800
To: Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Stripping Latin range in fonts used by g-i installer?
I have not had the chance t
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 06:01:49PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > With a good image there are differences (the latin characters look
> > "thinner"). It should be up to the translators to decide.
> > The most significant difference is probably in punc
Hi,
it would be great if you could unblock ttf-dejavu 2.23-1 which
fixes an important issue [1].
Thanx alot in advance,
Davide
[1]
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=200712191257.59357.benlaenen%40gmail.com&forum_name=dejavu-fonts
signature.asc
Description: Digital signat
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 02:20:47AM +0900, Changwoo Ryu wrote:
> 2008-02-17 (일), 23:35 +0900, Kenshi Muto:
>
> > > I found some Hangul glyphs are missing during "expertgui" installation,
> > > with sid d-i 16-Feb-2008. Mojibakes seemed to happen on revised
> > > translations.
> >
> > > I won
Hi,
this version fixes #471024 which affects the graphical installer:
please unblock it.
TIA,
Davide
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> From my tests, this is fixed.
it is indeed.
regards,
Davide
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 03:55:34PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > System Information
>
> Please provide me the BIOS section.
here's a full log of my macbook
http://www.webalice.it/zinosat/macbook/macbook_dmidecode.log
regards,
Davide
signatur
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 04:29:34PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Please provide me the BIOS section.
> >
> > here's a full log of my macbook
>
> Does your macbook has the bootcamp upgraded firmware?
I install
Hi,
bugs #368300 and #368329 affect Czech/Slovak and Korean respectively.
Since the bugs were filed there were big changes in g-i:
* new libraries made it into the Debian archives
* ttf-cjk-compact-udeb (1.5) was recently uploaded
It'd be excellent if native speakers could help reproducing the a
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 08:56:10PM +0200, Miroslav Kure wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 07:53:17PM +0200, Peter Mann wrote:
> >
> > i just test Slovak messages with recent mini.iso ... 11.714.560 bytes
> > md5sum: 580d73f212614a229b7ad8a7d59d7850
> >
> > i made screenshots with wrong letters ..
A bit of history:
a problem [1] with Italic letters near the borders which was fixed
upstream; the fix caused some problems which can be seen in [2] and
was noticed when g-i switched to the 2.8.x set of libraries.
Upstream version of gtk+ is currently 2.10.3, and according to Mike
Emmel, upstream
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 19:00:08 +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
> 2. revert the patch needed to fix [1]
> this would involve a new upload of gtk+2.0, which should include a patch
> to fix the problem with horizontal/vertical lines.
> I tested and prepared a patch which fixes the pro
I've taken some screenshots as it was done a while ago (see [1])
hoping that your comments can help improving fonts quality for
Debian and in particular for the new graphical installer.
Since the last survey, this is the list of major changes:
* graphic libraries have been updated
* default fon
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:06:45PM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
> * #374902 was fixed with a new upload of libfreetype6-udeb_2.2.1-4_i386.udeb
libfreetype6-udeb_2.2.1-4
>
> the screenshots can be found in [2], and in case you wanted to compare them
> to the
> previous, see [3]
&
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 09:57:15PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> tag 386860 + pending confirmed upstream
> stop
>
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2006, Davide Viti wrote:
> > the decision has to be made by the gnome team, responsable also of the
> > udebs used with g-i. Don't
Hi Lior,
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:42:19PM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hebrew looks fine. thanks.
good; Hebrew is still using glyphs out of freefont.
Hebrew glyphs have just been included in dejavu: any chance you can give some
feedback about it? I'll try to get some screenshots to comp
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:40:10 +0200, Yukiharu Yabuki wrote:
> It is a possiblity that missing glyph issue :
> (2) font data does not have glyph
that's right:
the rectangles show which glyphs are missing in the font file
looking at [1] shows that the following glyph is missing
it's used 2 ti
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 03:17:35PM +0200, G Karunakar wrote:
> Hindi looks fine in this screenshot.. but i found some other issues -
> eg the top part of Hindi string above the base line (from which
> character seem to hang) is not appearing in the text just below the
> logo banner, in the install
Hi Eddy,
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 04:37:22PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> The font size is different in the screenshots and, thus I can't tell
> if the "half of breve" issue has gone.
but does the latest version of the screenshot look ok for Romanian?
ciao,
Davide
signature.asc
Description: Di
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 11:14:21AM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> BTW, I hope the issue "Subject: I met some issue for Daily Etch installer"
> raised by Yukiharu is already solved by my last upload of cjkfont.
AFAICT it is fine; see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/09/msg00431.html
I've also
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 11:54:02PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> If new message has an new character, graphical-installer will
> show a broken character or just miss it.
> I believe graphical-installer has to load "full" font file at
> least before running tasksel.
I see your point, but most font fi
FYI,
Davide
- Forwarded message from Denis Jacquerye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Denis Jacquerye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:09:45 +0200
To: DejaVu-Fonts mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [DejaVu-fonts] DejaVu Fonts 2.10 released
DejaVu fonts 2.10 has been relea
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 04:53:40PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Hmm, I was under the impresion that the vertical line should have been
> > fixed at the same time as horizontal issue was fixed.
>
> Well, as the horizontal one is not yet fixed either that impression is
> probably correct ;-)
both f
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 04:25:42PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Well, let's assume for now that I am not crazy.
>
> If I run g-i in vmware, I get this:
> http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i/g-i_lineheight-and-ugly-font.png
>
> That is almost double lineheight between choices! Also, does the font look
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 07:32:21PM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> Can an updated round of d-i screen shots be taken when d-i will use 2.10
> instead of 2.09 ?
I just did it; see [1]
any chance you can test how Hebrew looks like with dejavu?
ATM g-i uses freefont for Hebrew.
regards,
Davide
PS: I i
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:04:47AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 18 September 2006 23:45, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> > I did not test this by myself, but davide did it and the patch proved
> > to work (Davide, any hint about how to reproduce a correct keymap
> > change in the g-i ?).
>
> Da
Last week, after reading [1], I wanted to see how hard it'd be
to port the graphical installer on arm.
I set up a sid VM and checked out a copy of the d-i build
environment as described in [2]
I then created a patch ([3]) based on the existing g-i build
environments and tried to compile which took
> BTW, if you need the highcontrast engine as well, it should be possible
> now Loïc is building a gtk2-engines-udeb package.
I've just built a g-i mini.iso [1] containing the udeb created by Loïc [2]
In case anyone wanted to try and rebuild it here's what I've done:
* copy gtk2-engines-udeb_2.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 04:35:30PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > The Chinese (both simplified and traditional) display in the GTK
> > installer is completely broken. Many glyphs are missing, and shown
> > just as boxes with the unicode number in it. This can be easily seen
> > in the "Choose Langua
FYI
regards,
Davide
- Forwarded message from Ben Laenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Ben Laenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:06:32 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [DejaVu-fonts] DejaVu Fonts 2.11 released
DejaVu F
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 01:22:59PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> During configurations of LVM , one template was not translated to Italian,
> and another one had a meaningless translation
> (starting as "Prima di poter configurare LVM possa, " )
>
thanx for spotting that, I just committed a version
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 04:51:51PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> With latest debian-installer netinst iso (20061023), I could not
> manage to get dead keys work to type accents (especially "ô") in the
> user name, before entering the login.
> I tried other dead keys without any success.
>
> I was
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 11:14:23PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > can you enter those using non-graphical installer or, if using g-i, when you
> > switch to VT2 (ctrl-alt-f2)?
>
> I'm running amd64 so switching to another VT does not work. I'm going to
> test with the non-graphical installer.
I
>Whenever you change something, you regenerate th udeb then the mini iso
>and boot it, right?
yes
FYI, I sent a message to the directfb ML:
http://mail.directfb.org/pipermail/directfb-dev/2006-October/002394.html
regards,
Davide
Naviga e telefona senza limiti con Tiscali
Scopri le promoz
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 08:13:11PM +0200, Fabrice LORRAIN wrote:
> Attilio Fiandrotti à écrit :
> I gave a try and there is some improvement :
>
> FYI, wget in busybox doesn't support --no-check-certificate, but I
> managed to get your fb.modes file.
>
> After :
> # export DEBIAN_FRONTEND=newt
>
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.1.3-3
Severity: minor
insertion of non-latin chars is properly handled but backspace treats
each of those as two characters; if you enter for example "è" and
press "backspace" twice, you'll "eat" part of the prompt... if you
enter the same character ten times you'll b
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 02:27:52PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > http://mail.directfb.org/pipermail/directfb-dev/2006-October/002394.html
>
> OK. Does it give clues? I'm not really skilled in this field.
not much since I'm not very skilled in this either
> BTW, I was told not being able to s
Package: cdebconf-gtk-udeb
Severity: normal
Keymap selection under g-i works once and if you try to change it it
will not work; switching to text consle all changes have effect.
I tried to select Italian keymap and everything looks ok; if I change the
keymap to "American English" nothing changes;
101 - 200 of 361 matches
Mail list logo
