On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 11:38:03AM +0200, Alfredo Sola wrote:
>
>Not sure if this is the right place, but here it goes. As we all
> know, sun servers without a framebuffer (and certain other x86s too)
> need to be configured and installed via a serial console that speaks at
> 9600 bps by de
> But there has been only some activity on sparc, mipsel, alpha, m69k
> (amiga), and s390; and little or progress on hppa, arm, various m68k
> subarches, and many less common powerpc subarches; and many of these
> architectures are nowhere near working.
FYI, after I fix some SILO issues this weeke
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 06:35:21PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out why depmod, insmod, and modprobe are give the
> error that the sparc64 kernel modules are not for this architecture on
> my latest d-i boot cds. I'm using the ones in the modutils-full udeb,
> uname -m report
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 10:48:42PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 06:35:21PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> > I'm trying to figure out why depmod, insmod, and modprobe are give the
> > error that the sparc64 kernel modules are not for this architecture on
> > my latest d-i boo
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 08:21:18AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 04:22:34PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
>
> > > I also remember (was it Thomas? Blars? hmmm...) mentioning that the
> > > fdisk udeb wasn't getting loaded for some reason. I'm hoping that the
> > > whole p
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 07:14:50PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 11:26:06AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 08:21:18AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 04:22:34PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 12:23:34AM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 11:26, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > > Hmm... Why don't we just use parted for now, until a better solution
> > > comes around? It's in the archive, and AFAICT supports Sparc.
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 08:44:58PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Here is a mini-ISO image I cooked up with SILO rolled back to 1.3.2. Tom
> Callaway suggested that I try this because a lot of new stuff related to
> initrds changed in 1.4.x.
>
> http://june.voxel.net/~joshk/mini.iso
The
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 05:09:06PM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Monday 31 May 2004 05:44, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Here is a mini-ISO image I cooked up with SILO rolled back to 1.3.2.
> > Tom Callaway suggested that I try th
FYI, someone reported that adding rootfstype=ext2 made the images
bootable. Looks like something in the kernel isn't checking the initrd
for ext2. So this may not be a SILO problem (I know Josh is already
aware of this, but others are probably interested in the results here).
--
Debian - http
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 05:19:32PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Thanks to some surprising sleuth work by Boris Gontar we might have a
> workaround for the dastardly initrd bug affecting certain sparc64
> machines.
>
> So, without further ado:
>
> * http://june.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i/imag
On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 04:13:32PM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Saturday 05 June 2004 14:57, Ben Collins wrote:
> > FYI, someone reported that adding rootfstype=ext2 made the images
> > bootable. Looks like somet
> Then today (don't know why this idea came to me) I decided to open up
> the box and juggle around with the memory sticks. And voila! Moving the
> two sticks from DIMM3 and DIMM4 to DIMM1 and DIMM2 made the initrd
> issue go away (booted with default SILO parameters). Dunno why Sarge is
> pick
I did some checking, and the newer memory allocation in SILO was not
verifying that the initrd physical location was in the lower 32-bits
address range. The kernel only accepts a 32-bit address range for
initrd's. I re-added the check, so now SILO will put out a decent
failure.
I suspect that in t
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:41:25PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 13:08:22 -0400
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I suspect that in the long run, I really need to make it so that the
> > initrd gets lower memory precendence over th
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 12:27:03AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Silo 1.4.6 does not solve the initrd loading problem. (The changelog entry
> was unclear if it should or not.)
>
> The d-i image at
>
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/sparc/20040629/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
>
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 11:09:30PM -0700, Tim Spriggs wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been having some serious issues trying to get a
> SparcStation 20 to boot. In order to install debian I had to net-boot the
> machine since it did not like the cd-rom for some reason.
>
> The installat
> One person mentioned that older cd-roms don't always like cd-rw media and
> that might be the source of my error. For reference sake, I think that may
> be a part of it but I also looked at a sun documentation page of sparc
> boot-proms and noticed that you can boot different cd-rom partitions an
(please Cc, not on list)
I cannot build the debian-installer on a 2.5 system because depmod
fails. The reason is that unless depmod is given a symbols file
(System.map) it tries to get symbol information from the kernel.
I notice that the i386 kernel udeb includes modules.dep. Would it be
better
> To my current knowledge, all of them can be removed with the following
> exceptions:
> - kernel-image-2.2.25-mac
> - kernel-image-2.2.25-mac-udeb
> - kernel-patch-2.2.25-m68k
> - kernel-source-2.2.25
You can't remove the sparc ones. 2.2 is the only thing that runs stable
on sparc32's (all sparc
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 08:42:57PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> Package: boot-floppies
> Version: 20020411
> Severity: important
>
> I downloaded all bf2.4 files from www.debian.org:
> rescue.bin
> root.bin
> linux.bin
> install.bat
> basedebs.tar
>
> and placed them in the correct direct
> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@
> custom kernel to /mnt/linux.bin.gz.
>
> If you want to be complete about it, you'll also want to gzip the
> -System.map from your custom kernel and place it in /mnt
> +System.map from your custom kernel, gzip it and place it in /mnt
> as sys_map.gz and gzip the .confi
> I hope that this resolves the issues with SILO and initrd!
Me too!
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 04:11:08PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-14 16:53]:
> > > > I did not have any problem, only some warning during boot of the CDROM
> > > > about unimplemented SPARC instruction.
> > >
> > When I boot I still have these warning
> > > I got the same type of warnings between the boot of the CDROM kernel and
> > > the first stage of the installer.
> >
> > Let's ask debian-sparc about this. So apparently the system boots
> > fine, but those warnings are displayed. Can/should anything be done
> > about this?
Am I to unders
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 06:49:06PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:18:40PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Am I to understand that this is based on the new cd image with my
> > silo/kernel fixes?
>
> Probably since this ISO was built on 20040511.
>
> Ultra1: On this one, I got (modulo any typos)
>
> Loading initial ramdisk (1477684 bytes at 0x01x phys 022340800 virt) ...
> [spinning \/]
> Remapping the kernel ... FP Disabled
> ok
>
> and I was back to the OpenBoot 'ok' prompt.
This is strange.
> Ultra10: On this one, I
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 07:58:09PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:36:22PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Can you (and anyone else testing this initrd) send me the "Loading
> > initrd" line from silo aswell as the "prtconf -pv" output from
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 08:47:45PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 02:06:02PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > So SILO doesn't have a message like:
> >
> > Loading initial ramdisk size (at phys, virt)
>
> Humpf, it was booting from hard di
> loaded kernel version 2.4.26
> Loading initial ramdisk ( 1477684 bytes at 0x01x phys, 0x6080 virt)
Crap, silo's printf doesn't support lx or llx. I need to fix that,
because I really need that info.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion -
> Thanks for trying it out. Ben, was that patch supposed to actually fix
> something, or was it just supposed to be informative?
Both.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
> Loading initial ramdisk ( 1477684 bytes at 0x01x phys, 0x6080 virt)
Ok, there's a new second.b on sparc-boot.org/pub/testing/. Give that a
shot.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 11:21:01PM -0700, Patrick Morris wrote:
> For what it's worth, I get the same thing reported earlier when trying
> this image on my Ultra 5:
>
> NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0.
> RAMDISK: Couldn't find valid RAM disk image starting at 0.
> Freeing initr
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 07:50:44AM -0700, Patrick Morris wrote:
> boot:
> Allocated 8 Megs of memory at 0x4000 for kernel
> Uncompressing image...
> Loaded kernel version 2.4.26
> Loading initial ramdisk (1477459 bytes at 0x10C0 phys, 0x40C0
> virt)...
> Remapping the kernel... Done
>
> >>RAMDISK: Couldn't find valid RAM disk image starting at 0.
> >>Freeing initrd memory: 1442 freed
> >>cramfs: wrong magic
Wait a second. Is this ramdisk really cramfs, or is it romfs?
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 08:48:46PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 11:09:20PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > Interesting. Where did you get these images from? people.d.o/~jbailey?
> > > Also I assume this is on sparc64, right?
> ^-- please answer, it&
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 04:17:24PM +0200, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 07:28:16AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > Does debian-installer require devfs=mount is a boot param still? We have
> > a fix to make the sparc/sparc64 kernel images default with
rate the script to work with
certain things (like the libc-x.x.x.so filename) and also remove the
backward compat crap that makes it so crufty.
--
---===-=-======-=====---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 06:46:22PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ben Collins wrote:
> > Actually, what I am going to do is take over this script, and have it
> > installed with libc6-pic. It will then be guranteed to work with that
> > version. Then boot-floppies can work with
well be. I knew one of the latest "small" editors
was using asm on i386, and C elsewhere.
--
-------===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU
st stick with 2.2.18 ? (I gather not...)
Sparc has pre11 in incoming, so go with that for us (I can change it, if
you want).
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PR
space hog, see the
> list archives for further info on that (there was a discussion on this
> topic a couple of days ago).
Other archs doesn't matter. LILO never supported anything other than
x86, and so neither will GRUB, and so it wont matter :)
--
-------===-=-==-=
Just FYI,
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
> the kernel, Debian, the image, something else, or all of the above?
> >
> > Any assistance is more than appreciated.
This was a common problem with the SS2's, and I don't think we ever
resolved it. I'm going to produce some woody boot-floppies soon, perhaps
s potato or woody?
--
---===-=-==-=---=----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
To U
tty much handle everything. I'm not exactly sure what I
am going to do with this script yet. Hopefully package it for
installation as needed (and to make it distribution and architecture
neutral).
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Col
load the shadow source and recompile without PAM
support.
--
---===-=-======-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
e package that I want.
>
> Is there a way of forcing installation so that something will install?
dpkg -i libc6_2.2.2-4.deb libdb2_2.7.7-7.deb
Fairly simple.
--
---===-=-==-=====---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic vo
and Modules"
> before I get this error (on inserting the driver-1.bin image from
> ftp.debian.org):
Could you try the newer sparc boot floppies at this url
http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/disk-sparc/current/
Thanks
--
---===-=-==-=-------=-
D's, but
that isn't done by Debian. I have never seen firewall and proxy software
for Linux that costs $1800 USD though. Debian GNU/Linux has firewall and
proxy software included with the stock version (IOW, free).
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=-------=--
pthread from my system to my boot-disc.
Which mklibs are you using? You'll need the one from CVS.
--
---===-=-==-=-------======-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [
.
objdump --dynamic-syms /usr/lib/libc_pic/* | grep
If it's there, then it's a problem in mklibs
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
`
boot-floppies?
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=-
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 10:47:43AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Package: kernel-image-sparc-2.4
> > Boot floppies should really get it's own set of local headers so it
> > doesn't have to include kerne
n be started on tty2, but if I try running dbootstrap from it,
> it segfaults
Not sure about the segfault, but FYI, the "Unimplemented" system call
has nothing to do with it.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ..
ring.h:88: conflicting types for `__bzero'
> /usr/include/string.h:238: previous declaration of `__bzero'
Filing a bug on kernel-image-sparc-2.4...
Boot floppies should really get it's own set of local headers so it
doesn't have to include kernel headers. This will avoid the confl
know how things go.
http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/disks-sparc/current/
For netboot, you should only need the tftpimage under the subarch
directory of your choice. The rest of the install should be able to
download everything else itself.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=====---
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 04:40:51PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > These are based on the latest CVS of boot-floppies. The major change is
> > that the sun4u images are built from the 2.4.4 kernel images. The best
> > part
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 07:38:24AM +0200, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > Let me know how things go.
> >
> > http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/disks-sparc/current/
> >
> > For netboot, you should only need the tftpimage und
gt; However, feel free to commit something to base-config cvs where termwrap
> now lives, for better devfs support.
Joey's right. By this time, devfsd will be started..._if_ it is
installed.
--
---===-=-==-=-------==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on
o it still pops up with the warning, but allows the user to
continue.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=====--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTE
ng the current state of things as
"woody" _was_ shown as "stable" and potato was shown as "archived". Can
this be updated aswell?
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [E
anged just after Booting Linux message.
>
> No idea what the issue is. Please try 2.3.5 when that releases or
> tests, I guess. Maybe it's fixed already...
It's a kernel issue, most likely.
--
-------===-=-==-=---==-=---
it.
>
> Also, in a poll, a lot more users said they used the dialog frontend
> than anything else.
Used or prefered? I use dialog more, only because I'm too lazy to change
the default. However, I prefer the slang/stool frontend.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=====--
rc/current/
(FYI)
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==-
libnewt-pic: /usr/lib/libnewt_pic.a
> $
I'd blame this on slang. It's lib-pic file is something like
libslang0_pic.a. If it used the standard libslang_pic.a, I could take
out the regex. Want to file a bug on it?
--
---===-=-==-=-------=----=
t would be slightly better to build
> the shared library with non-PIC objects. You may not have done it
> intentionally but it sounds like you got the right result. :-)
Wouldn't building the .so with non-PIC break quite a few things?
--
-------===-=-==-=
for a reason in shared libs? :)
--
---===-=-==-=---=====--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 12:53:08PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> On Sat Jun 16, 2001 at 10:52:25AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 02:55:30PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
> > > >Wouldn't building the .so with non-PIC break quite a few things?
>
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 01:22:50PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> On Sat Jun 16, 2001 at 03:04:28PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Uh, wrong. We compile _all_ shared libs using -fPIC (IOW, every .so).
> > That has nothing to do with mklibs.sh, it has to do with being a shared
> &g
ailures. Tell that to gcc, where libgcc.a is
compiled with -fPIC. Tell it to libtool that also uses -fPIC on all
linux elf platforms.
I think common practice negates your theory.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on
:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/woody/main/disks-sparc/current/
Thanks.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--==
this case anyway.
--
---===-=-==-=---=----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
cked to support this? I'm not sure how you
would create a fully installed system in a chroot on a different arch
though.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage...
tem. Only libc5 should pull it in.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 12:59:22PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> > Package: debootstrap
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 02:49:42AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> >> > The perl-base package was not installed. Neither was ldso (which is on the
> >> > same l
x27;t test floppy images.
Explaining what "do not boot" means might help. How far do they get?
Have you tried the linux-a.out images? Have you tried booting them with
-p to see the extent of the kernel outpu?
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=---=====-----
ts? It may be that that it is
trying to execute is segv'ing, and that would be an important bit of
information.
Ben
--
.------===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux
>
> initrd extends beyond end of memory (0xc1d8 > 0xc1d0)
> disabling initrd
>
> What can i do ?
How much memory do you have?
--
.--===-=-==-=====-------==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--
bian in this box)
Check the syslinux script on the DOS disk, and see what it passes to
lilo for ramdisk=
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collin
o for ramdisk=
>
> I'm using:
>
> loadlin linux root=/dev/ram initrd=root.bin
Isn't there a batch script that passes all the commands? (been awhile
since I DOS booted a PC, so remind me :)
You could try adding "ramdisk=8000" to that.
Ben
--
.--
- Forwarded message from Rich Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
X-Virus-Scanner: McAfee Virus Engine
X-Spam-Status: Scanner Called
X-Sent: 2 Feb 2002 15:14:43 GMT
From: Rich Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#131709: chroo
lease_id=73260
If it is really that important, raise the severity of the bug, and we
will certainly have to fix it for release.
--
.--===-=-==-=---=====----=-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAI
de an alternative. It would be useless. Fsck is run
from automated scripts, so no-one would get the fixes without a lot of
mucking around.
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 06:11:27PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 12:01:12PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > So I suppose it won't be OK, then... better provide an alternative
> > > package ?
> >
> > Better to not provide an alternati
g.
>
Will do for sparc tonight.
--
.--===-=-==-=---=====----=-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
of their bug reports.
>
Uh, someone is building boot-floppies for sparc, we've just been
waiting for a decent kernel to use.
--
.--===-=-======-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.c
severity 132671 serious
thanks
> thanks
>
> #include
> Ben Collins [DPL] wrote on Sat Mar 02, 2002 um 08:06:36PM:
>
> > > If nobody wants to build BFs for Sparc, we should just downgrade
> > > severities of their bug reports.
> > >
> >
>
ould be able to get back and help coordinate the final woody
> boot-floppies
Excellent. I'll start my new builds using this version (for sparc)
--
.--===-=-==-=---=--------=-=-----.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux
> to end.
Why both with nfs when the tftpboot.img has all you need? Just required
tftp+rarp.
As for the nfs options, I'll get them fixed in the next kernel upload.
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben
to `kernel-image-2.4.16-sun4u'.
Fixed in 2.4.18 images.
--
.--===-=-==-=---=--------=-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTEC
to `kernel-image-2.4.16-sun4u'.
Fixed in 2.4.18 images.
--
.--===-=-==-=---=--------=-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTEC
gt; Bug reassigned from package `boot-floppies' to `kernel-image-sparc-2.4'.
>
I have no idea what you are attempting to do, but that does an iBook
install problem have to do with sparc kernel images?
--
.--==-====--------=-=-.
/ Ben Co
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 09:40:54AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-sparc-2.4
> Severity: wishlist
>
> #include
> Ben Collins [DPL] wrote on Fri Mar 22, 2002 um 01:45:00AM:
>
> > I have no idea what you are attempting to do, but that does an iBook
>
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:51:09AM -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
> Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 02:45:30PM -0500 wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 12:17:59PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >
> > > On an Ultra1, 384MB boot-floppies 3.0.20-2002-03-07:
> > >
> > > 2b3000 TILO
> > > Selecting sun4u kernel...
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 10:07:38AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> Jim Westveer wrote on Thu Apr 04, 2002 um 05:24:24PM:
> > > And last, woody ought to be 2.2 based and not 2.4 based ... but since I
> > > also find it lame to use 2.2.x by default nowadays ...
> > >
> >
> > I disagree, 2
Please take me of the Cc of this thread.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:25:57PM -0400, Aravind Vinnakota wrote:
> Hi all!
> I just started using Debian. I am trying to install debian on Sun Ultra
> 5 machine. I tried 3 different ways to install it but could'nt:
>
> 1) I downloaded the CD images. I tried to burn it on CDs but the images
>
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 12:19:14AM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> On Thu Jun 08, 2000 at 11:15:11PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 04:51:03PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > I see that dbootstrap supports the "initchroot" feature of some k
k into it.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
