On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 05:41:11PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 02:07:43AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 10:39:25AM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > > > e2fsprogs 1.26 is out, including fixes for one but tagged important, > > > ext3-related fixes, reiserfs support in fsck, and more complete > > > support for filesystems in >2GB files. > > > > > > I suppose it is too late to get this one in base, so I can package it > > > in an e2fsprogs-1.26 package if needed. However, it would probably be > > > better if it could go in base... What do boot-floppies and release > > > manager think ? > > > > Am I correct in thinking that e2fsprogs doesn't provide any shared > > libraries > > wrong - packages depending on the libs, from memory: dump, mc, some > undeletion progs, maybe other things. > > > Assuming that's the case... > > So I suppose it won't be OK, then... better provide an alternative > package ?
Better to not provide an alternative. It would be useless. Fsck is run from automated scripts, so no-one would get the fixes without a lot of mucking around. Ben -- .----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=-----. / Ben Collins -- Debian GNU/Linux -- WatchGuard.com \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
