Bug#1089276: win32-loader: FTBFS with make 4.4.1

Hi, On 12-04-2025 12:54, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Paul Gevers (2025-04-12): Do you speak on behalf of all maintainers here? Do you want me to find out what needs to be done to remove win32-loader from trixie? I'm not aware of anyone wanting to keep win32-loader around, so yeah, looking into it

Bug#1089276: win32-loader: FTBFS with make 4.4.1

Hi Paul, Am 12. April 2025 12:20:23 MESZ schrieb Paul Gevers : >Hi, > >On 27-03-2025 19:57, Holger Wansing wrote: >> Am 27. März 2025 15:25:09 MEZ schrieb Paul Gevers : >>> I've seen multiple times that win32-loader was mentioned during a stable >>> point release IRC discussion and I am under the

Bug#1089276: win32-loader: FTBFS with make 4.4.1

Hi, Paul Gevers (2025-04-12): > Do you speak on behalf of all maintainers here? Do you want me to find > out what needs to be done to remove win32-loader from trixie? I'm not aware of anyone wanting to keep win32-loader around, so yeah, looking into its removal would make sense to me. Cheers,

Bug#1102724: RM: win32-loader -- RoQA; not considered worthwhile to maintain further

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: moreinfo X-Debbugs-Cc: win32-loa...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:win32-loader User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove Hi ftp-master, [Added the moreinfo tag as d-i needs adaptation first and because of the followi

Bug#1089276: win32-loader: FTBFS with make 4.4.1

Hi Holger, On 12-04-2025 13:31, Holger Wansing wrote: It has already been removed from the d-i builds 2 years ago with And what about e.g. https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-install

Bug#1089276: win32-loader: FTBFS with make 4.4.1

Paul Gevers (2025-04-12): > On 12-04-2025 12:54, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > I'm not aware of anyone wanting to keep win32-loader around, so > > yeah, looking into its removal would make sense to me. > > > To be fair, I was mostly thinking about it's special status in our > archive, but I just re

Bug#1089276: win32-loader: FTBFS with make 4.4.1

Hi, Am 12. April 2025 13:17:30 MESZ schrieb Paul Gevers : >Hi, > >On 12-04-2025 12:54, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Paul Gevers (2025-04-12): >>> Do you speak on behalf of all maintainers here? Do you want me to find >>> out what needs to be done to remove win32-loader from trixie? >> >> I'm not aw

Bug#1089276: win32-loader: FTBFS with make 4.4.1

Holger Wansing (2025-04-12): > It has already been removed from the d-i builds 2 years ago with > That'd be the *images* builds. It's still listed and used in src:debian-installer builds, see debia

Bug#1089276: Not used in live images either + Source grep

Hello all, the use of win32-loader was defaulted to false in the live-build images on Wed Aug 10 08:00:08 2022 +0200. Its git commit message refers to https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2022/08/msg00035.html The sentiment back then was to remove win32-loader as well. A quick search https:/

Bug#782699: debian-boot: IPv6 prefix notation in the installer

Hey everyone! Jens mentioned this bug today during the BSP in Vienna. I think this already got solved a few iterations earlier - at least in Bookworm this looks fine to me where I can simply set "fc01::666/64" (don’t judge the range). Screenshot: https://cdn.gyptazy.com/images/debian_ipv6_insta

Bug#1102690: A higher version (...) is still installed, no reflashing required

Hi, Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2025-04-12 08:42:33) > Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues (2025-04-12): > > Package: flash-kernel > > Version: 3.109+reform1 > > > This problem occurred with a patched flash-kernel but you know that we only > > patch the machines file with more entries and do not patch

Bug#1089276: win32-loader: FTBFS with make 4.4.1

Hi, On 27-03-2025 19:57, Holger Wansing wrote: Am 27. März 2025 15:25:09 MEZ schrieb Paul Gevers : I've seen multiple times that win32-loader was mentioned during a stable point release IRC discussion and I am under the impression that "we" want to remove it at some point. I'm wondering if no

Bug#1089276: Not used in live images either + Source grep

Hi, Roland Clobus wrote (Sat, 12 Apr 2025 15:14:37 +0200): > So a removal would need additional bug reports + patches for: > debian-installer MR created: https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/61 https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/d-i/-/merge_requests/20

Bug#1102690: A higher version (...) is still installed, no reflashing required

On 2025-04-12, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > $ apt-cache policy linux-image-arm64 > linux-image-arm64: > Installed: 6.12.19-1+reform20250322T135019Z > Candidate: 6.12.22-1+reform20250411T222458Z ... > $ sudo apt full-upgrade ... > Removing linux-headers-6.12.16-mnt-reform-arm64 > (

Bug#1102690: A higher version (...) is still installed, no reflashing required

Quoting Vagrant Cascadian (2025-04-13 05:42:01) > On 2025-04-12, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > > $ apt-cache policy linux-image-arm64 > > linux-image-arm64: > > Installed: 6.12.19-1+reform20250322T135019Z > > Candidate: 6.12.22-1+reform20250411T222458Z > ... > > $ sudo apt full-upgr