Hello Holger,
Debian FTP Masters (2024-11-29):
> Format: 1.8
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 22:30:53 +0100
> Source: console-setup
> Architecture: source
> Version: 1.233
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: medium
> Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
> Changed-By: Holger Wansing
> Changes:
> con
Hi Holger,
Debian FTP Masters (2024-11-29):
> Format: 1.8
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 23:48:26 +0100
> Source: netcfg
> Architecture: source
> Version: 1.192
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: medium
> Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
> Changed-By: Holger Wansing
> Changes:
> netcfg (1.192
Hi,
Pascal Hambourg wrote (Thu, 26 Dec 2024 20:21:10
+0100):
> On 26/12/2024 at 19:14, Holger Wansing wrote:
> >
> > However, sublevel4 is "specific to less-popular arches (such as powerpc,
> > mips
> > or sparc) or used in experimental features".
> > That leads to the decision, which arch is
Package: grub-installer
Version: 1.204
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Commit 9e11cfba (Add support for armhf EFI machines) does not disable
grub-installer on non-EFI armhf. The "Install the GRUB boot loader" menu
item is available in expert install, and if selected, grub-installer
will try and fa
systemd-boot-installer_0.7_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
systemd-boot-installer_0.7.dsc
systemd-boot-installer_0.7.tar.xz
systemd-boot-installer_0.7_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
On 26/12/2024 at 19:14, Holger Wansing wrote:
However, sublevel4 is "specific to less-popular arches (such as powerpc, mips
or sparc) or used in experimental features".
That leads to the decision, which arch is popular and which is not.
But since arm64 is somewhat new, we could count that to the
Control: severity -1 important
Vincent Lefevre (2024-07-22):
> Package: grub-common
> Version: 2.12-5
> Severity: normal
>
> After a recent grub2 upgrade, there are now duplicate "GNU/Linux"
> in menuentry and submenu lines of /boot/grub/grub.cfg, e.g.
>
> menuentry 'Debian GNU/Linux GNU/Linux'
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 11:02:12 +0100
Source: systemd-boot-installer
Architecture: source
Version: 0.7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 18:38:13 +0100
Source: rootskel
Architecture: source
Version: 1.138
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By:
rootskel_1.138_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.138.dsc
rootskel_1.138.tar.xz
rootskel_1.138_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Hi,
Salvatore Bonaccorso (2024-12-25):
> No objection at all and think there are no new RC bugs reported (yet)
> against it.
>
> Beeing bit more verbose: I was planning to do the 6.12.7 upload once
> it is relased (around 27th of December). The review is announced:
> https://lore.kernel.org/stab
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois wrote (Thu, 26 Dec 2024 11:38:55 +0100):
> Debian FTP Masters (2024-12-26):
> > systemd-boot-installer (0.7) unstable; urgency=medium
[...]
> I failed to spot this initially while having a look at this package, but
> it seems to me sl3 is not appropriate here: that's a packa
Hi Holger,
Debian FTP Masters (2024-12-26):
> systemd-boot-installer (0.7) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>[ Updated translations ]
>* Belarusian (be.po) by Joe
>* Estonian (et.po) by Kristjan Räts
>* Persian (fa.po) by peylight
>* French (fr.po) by Baptiste Jammet
>* Icel
Hi,
Holger Wansing (2024-12-26):
> Hmm, according to https://d-i.debian.org/doc/i18n-guide/ch01s04.html#sublevels
> sublevel3 is for "expert strings (some low priority features such as
> RAID, encrypted partitions, etc.)" - aka not for default install. So
> sl3 might not be that wrong.
Thanks fo
Control: reopen -1
Control: notfixed -1 1.9.19-4
Debian Bug Tracking System (2024-12-12):
> Format: 1.8
> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:50:31 +0100
> Source: haveged
> Architecture: source
> Version: 1.9.19-4
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: medium
> Maintainer: Daniel Baumann
> Changed-By: Danie
Cyril Brulebois (2024-12-26):
> No, this doesn't work: you cannot ship subdirectories of /dev in a
> Debian package and expect it to work, that's a directory managed by
> udev.
>
> In this specific context, the directory exists in the tree where d-i
> is built, it also exists in the initramfses t
16 matches
Mail list logo
