Bug#1026027: graphical installer: using nano in a installer shell fails

Philip Hands (2022-12-15): Perhaps the presence of the termcap file is irrelevant, or could it be that nano used to be able to make use of that, and more recently only supports terminfo? This is the explanation, I think. Nano removed support for Slang in version 5.5. The nano-udeb (5.4) th

Please dak copy-installer 20230217

Hi, FTP team, please sync the installer from sid to testing, as it seems to be Installed for all release architectures (9 total, even if mipsel just went in): dak copy-installer 20230217 Note: I didn't request a copy for the previous version (20230207) as it was mostly a canary upload, m

Bug#1031431: marked as done (debian-installer-netboot-images: FTBFS: Building 20220917, but bookworm has 20230207, failing the build)

g this archive rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20230216;users=lu...@debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20230216&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org

Bug#1031431: debian-installer-netboot-images: FTBFS: Building 20220917, but bookworm has 20230207, failing the build

Hi, On 17/02/23 at 13:07 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Version: 20230217 > > Hi Lucas, > > Lucas Nussbaum (2023-02-17): > > Source: debian-installer-netboot-images > > Version: 20220917+rebuild1 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: FTBFS &g

Bug#1031431: debian-installer-netboot-images: FTBFS: Building 20220917, but bookworm has 20230207, failing the build

Lucas Nussbaum (2023-02-17): > OK, I remembered about skipping debian-installer, but wasn't sure about > debian-installer-netboot-images Thanks and sorry for being a pain, I know we're the usual ugly duckling in the project… Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)

Re: Review for the non-free-firmware template in apt-setup

Hi, Just following up on that bit for information: Holger Wansing (2023-01-22): > Cyril Brulebois wrote (Sun, 22 Jan 2023 16:24:12 +0100): > > I've selected sublevel 5 instead of sublevel 1, to make sure this isn't > > going to hurt the translation status (which localechooser uses to warn > > a

Bug#592834: Seeing this under bookworm/sid

The unattended upgrade of grub failed (due to the fact that I had replaced the hard drive and used dd to copy sector for sector from the old one to the new, and that changed the identity of the hard drive). Per the instructions in the unattended upgrade message, I ran the following: root@white:~#

bookworm release date?

Dear Release Team colleagues, dear Boot team colleagues, I just sent out a bits from the RT where I'm claiming that bookworm is in a good state. And now I'm going to be extremely bold now: aim for the shortest freeze in Debian history. What do people think of the idea to start picking a releas

Re: bookworm release date?

Hi Paul, Paul Gevers (2023-02-17): > Yes, I know the debian-installer is not a done deal, so kibi, please > let us know where you think we stand with d-i (briefly is OK, I know > you normally report extensively elsewhere) and when you think d-i can > realistically be in a releasable state. (Sayin

Re: bookworm release date?

Hey folks, Cyril and I are in broad agreement on stuff, just adding a couple of points... On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 11:44:47PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Hi Paul, > >Paul Gevers (2023-02-17): >> Yes, I know the debian-installer is not a done deal, so kibi, please >> let us know where you think