Hi Chuck,
On 10-02-2022 01:34, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
The problem as I see it is that the debian
installer team is already aware of the problem and has been aware of it
for over six months because #983357 is marked as affecting d-i. So I do
not understand why #983357 is not included on the d-
On 2/10/2022 3:27 AM, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Chuck,
On 10-02-2022 01:34, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
The problem as I see it is that the debian installer team is already
aware of the problem and has been aware of it for over six months
because #983357 is marked as affecting d-i. So I do not underst
On 2/10/22 3:27 AM, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 10-02-2022 01:34, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
Do I need to file another bug in addition to #983357 to get this
problem listed on the bullseye (and also RC versions) d-i errata pages?
This is the most establish process, so yes, I suggest you just go an
Hello,
Is there any news on this? Perhaps I can just NMU?
Samuel
Samuel Thibault, le sam. 08 janv. 2022 18:21:28 +0100, a ecrit:
> Hello,
>
> I see that a newer upload of readline was done but without the proposed
> patch. Is there any problem with it? (attached here again)
>
> Having readlin
4 matches
Mail list logo
