Against which package should a bug in the 'Installation Guide" be reported?
This debian-user@ post [1] highlights a bug in the make-kpkg
instructions on [2]. The bug's also present in the wheezy
documentation.
Even though the make-kpkg man page says "--revision number", it's not
clear that it has
Hello,
Tom H, le Mon 04 May 2015 03:19:53 -0400, a écrit :
> Against which package should a bug in the 'Installation Guide" be reported?
See section 1.9. Your Documentation Help is Welcome
We welcome suggestions, comments, patches, and bug reports (use the package
installation-guidefor bugs, but
Your message dated Mon, 4 May 2015 09:47:14 +0200
with message-id <20150504094714.560f3fc8@s5.lokal>
and subject line done
has caused the Debian Bug report #783949,
regarding installation-report: Jessie-release-i386 set up on VIA-eden-homeserver
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Samuel Thibault (2015-05-04):
> Tom H, le Mon 04 May 2015 03:19:53 -0400, a écrit :
> > Against which package should a bug in the 'Installation Guide" be reported?
>
> See section 1.9. Your Documentation Help is Welcome
>
> We welcome suggestions, comments, patches, and bug reports (use the pack
Hi - thanks.
Requested information:
objdump -x /usr/lib/colord/colord | grep NEEDED
NEEDED libm.so.6
NEEDED libsqlite3.so.0
NEEDED libpolkit-gobject-1.so.0
NEEDED liblcms2.so.2
NEEDED libgudev-1.0.so.0
NEEDED
Michael Lager (2015-05-04):
> dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern /usr/local/lib/libusb-1.0.so.0
Here's your problem. On a jessie system, this file (located under
/usr/lib rather than /usr/local/lib), has a dependency on libudev.so.1
instead of libudev.so.0.
Move it aside (or delete it en
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 11:44 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Samuel Thibault (2015-05-04):
> > Tom H, le Mon 04 May 2015 03:19:53 -0400, a écrit :
> > > Against which package should a bug in the 'Installation Guide" be
> > > reported?
> >
> > See section 1.9. Your Documentation Help is Welcome
>
Michael Lager, le Mon 04 May 2015 12:54:14 +0100, a écrit :
> /usr/local/lib/libusb-1.0.so.0
> NEEDED libudev.so.0
> NEEDED librt.so.1
> NEEDED libpthread.so.0
> NEEDED libc.so.6
> dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern /usr/local/
On 2015-05-03, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 08:54 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>load ${device} ${partition} ${loadaddr} ${pathprefix}vmlinuz-${kvers} \
>> - && load ${device} ${partition} ${fdtaddr} ${pathprefix}dtb-${kvers} \
>> + && load ${device} ${partition} ${fdtaddr}
On 2015-05-02, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 08:54 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> The following patch prefers the use of the dtb file identified by the
>> u-boot variable ${fdtfile}, which makes it easier to support installs
>> where a single u-boot image can support multiple boa
Your message dated Mon, 4 May 2015 20:35:10 +0200
with message-id <20150504203510.08ec43ac5082a2a4f1139...@wansing-online.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#783358: installation-reports: Debian 8 CD - "Graphical
install" is not the default (installation guide says it should be)
has caused the Debian Bug
On 2015-05-03, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 09:12 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> This patch adds a few improvements to the uboot-generic bootscript:
>>
>> * Use kernel version in versioned files
>> * Include kernel version, device and partition in boot message
>> * Set the conso
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Package: installation-guide
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 08:48:47PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > > The situation for the d-i manual is similar: we have some languages,
> > > that did not receive no
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Installation of Debian 8.0
Choosing Gnome Desktop
Software installation fails.
* What exactly did you do (or not
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 10:22:17PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Holger Wansing (2015-05-03):
> > So, shall I revert the manual back to "text install is default"?
>
> Yes please. I asked Didier to keep an eye on it but he pretended being
> busy with other topics. ;)
On the off-chan
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 22:57 +0200, cody wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
>
>* What led up to the situation?
> Installation of Debian 8.0
> Choosing Gnome Deskto
Package: installation-reports
Followup-For: Bug #720073
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version: I have downloaded the three dvd iso images from a german mirror
(could habe been RWTH Aachen)
Date:
Machine: Personal Computer (Tower)
Partitions:
Base System Installation Chec
(Not sure why To/Cc were changed this way, but replying there anyway…)
Hendrik Boom (2015-05-04):
> On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 10:22:17PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Holger Wansing (2015-05-03):
> > > So, shall I revert the manual back to "text install is default"?
> >
> > Ye
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 11:31:20PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> (Not sure why To/Cc were changed this way, but replying there anyway…)
>
> Hendrik Boom (2015-05-04):
> > On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 10:22:17PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Holger Wansing (2015-05-03):
> >
Hello,
here some additional information:
Datum: Mon, 04 May 2015 23:01:34 +0100
Von: Ben Hutchings
An: Alfons Wuestnienhaus
Betreff: Re: Bug#784279: installation-reports: Software installation
fails when choosing gnome desktop
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 23:47 +0200, Alfons Wuestnienhaus wrote:
> H
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 debconf 1.5.56
Bug #784081 [debian-installer-8-netboot-amd64]
debian-installer-8-netboot-amd64: expert netboot install hangs at step
install_packages (tasksel): uninitialized value in vec at
/usr/bin/debconf-apt-progress
Bug reassigned from package 'de
Control: reassign -1 debconf 1.5.56
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
Hi Hendrik,
> expert netboot install hangs at step install_packages (tasksel):
> uninitialized value in vec at /usr/bin/debconf-apt-progress
This is most certainly a bug either in debconf or in the package it was
configuring, but no
console-setup_1.125_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
console-setup_1.125.dsc
console-setup_1.125.tar.xz
keyboard-configuration_1.125_all.deb
console-setup_1.125_all.deb
console-setup-mini_1.125_all.deb
console-setup-linux_1.125_all.deb
console-setu
console-setup_1.125_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
console-setup_1.125.dsc
console-setup_1.125.tar.xz
keyboard-configuration_1.125_all.deb
console-setup_1.125_all.deb
console-setup-mini_1.125_all.deb
console-setup-linux_1.125_all.deb
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 14:58:09 +0200
Source: console-setup
Binary: keyboard-configuration console-setup console-setup-mini
console-setup-linux console-setup-freebsd bdf2psf console-setup-udeb
console-setup-amiga-ekmap cons
Le dimanche, 3 mai 2015, 22.22:17 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> Holger Wansing (2015-05-03):
> > So, shall I revert the manual back to "text install is default"?
>
> Yes please. I asked Didier to keep an eye on it but he pretended being
> busy with other topics. ;)
Ah sorry, I didn't u
26 matches
Mail list logo
