On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 11:44 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> (2015-05-04): > > Tom H, le Mon 04 May 2015 03:19:53 -0400, a écrit : > > > Against which package should a bug in the 'Installation Guide" be > > > reported? > > > > See section 1.9. Your Documentation Help is Welcome > > > > We welcome suggestions, comments, patches, and bug reports (use the package > > installation-guidefor bugs, but check first to see if the problem is > > already reported). > > > > > Even though the make-kpkg man page says "--revision number", it's not > > > clear that it has to start with a number. In fact, the option's > > > misnamed because it's the package version and not its revision (in the > > > Debian policy meaning) that's being set - a fact that's more or less > > > acknowledged in the man page with "Changes the version number ...". > > > > I have already commited a suggested fix yesterday. > > FWIW I've only now discovered we're documenting how to compile a kernel > in the installation guide… Wouldn't it make sense to just point at the > kernel handbook instead, so that we don't have to chase updates and > duplicate work (e.g. “make deb-pkg” being preferred to make-kpkg)?
#784206 -- Ben Hutchings If you seem to know what you are doing, you'll be given more to do.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
