Re: Bug#737580: marked as done (ufsutils-udeb: mkfs.ufs: DIOCGMEDIASIZE: Inappropriate ioctl for device)

2014-03-08 Thread Robert Millan
On 08/03/2014 13:21, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > ufsutils (9.2-3.1) unstable; urgency=high > . >* Non-maintainer upload. >* Steal the following patch from the 10 branch, fixing failures to run > mkfs.ufs, notably from d-i (Closes: #737580): > 05_wipe_otherfs.patch: Handl

Re: Bug#737580: marked as done (ufsutils-udeb: mkfs.ufs: DIOCGMEDIASIZE: Inappropriate ioctl for device)

2014-03-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Robert Millan (2014-03-08): > On 08/03/2014 13:21, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > ufsutils (9.2-3.1) unstable; urgency=high > > . > >* Non-maintainer upload. > >* Steal the following patch from the 10 branch, fixing failures to run > > mkfs.ufs, notably from d-i (Closes: #737

Bug#724931: Please include the patch in git

2014-03-08 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Hi, On 08.03.2014 02:13, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Given the apt-cdrom regression we're hitting (#740673), I don't feel like shipping this amount of additional modifications in jessie alpha 1 images; on the other hand, not uploading what's in apt-setup's master currently would mean not using update

Bug#724931: Please include the patch in git

2014-03-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Andreas Cadhalpun (2014-03-08): > I generally agree that it would be good to have an alpha 1 installer > to use for testing regressions of this patch, but on the other hand > using loopmount to install Debian *works*. Sorry, but until it's been pushed to the masses, I can't blindly trust that. Ma

Bug#724931: Please include the patch in git

2014-03-08 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Hi, On 08.03.2014 19:04, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Andreas Cadhalpun (2014-03-08): I generally agree that it would be good to have an alpha 1 installer to use for testing regressions of this patch, but on the other hand using loopmount to install Debian *works*. Sorry, but until it's been pushe

Bug#724931: Please include the patch in git

2014-03-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Andreas Cadhalpun (2014-03-08): > I looked more closely and found that commenting out the following in > 40cdrom fixes the problem: > # Allow apt-cdrom to manage mounting/unmounting CDs in /target > if [ "$cd_mountable" ]; then > rm -f $ROOT/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/00NoMountCD

Bug#740410: installation-reports: Hang at "CD check" stage

2014-03-08 Thread Joseph Vidal-Rosset
Hi, in the meantime, I've used the Crunchbang CD install, based on Wheezy, and then I have updated to testing. My Debian testing runs smoothly again . 2014-03-08 1:51 GMT+01:00 Cyril Brulebois : > Control: block -1 by 740673 > > Cyril Brulebois (2014-03-04): > > I think you're hitting a known bu

Bug#741137: installation-reports

2014-03-08 Thread debmybugz
Package: installation-reports Boot method: Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.4.0/amd64/iso-cd/debian-7.4.0-amd64-netinst.iso Date: 20140308 Machine: <6 year old workstation> Processor: amd64 - 4 processors Memory: 8GB Partitions: Filesystem Type 1K-

Bug#730414: installation-reports: no network after installation

2014-03-08 Thread Harold Meneley
Package: installation-reports Followup-For: Bug #730414 -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.4 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=e

Bug#740073: You can continue OR install it the other way.

2014-03-08 Thread Alexander Sosedkin
Here's a workaround that works: The installation process can be continued just by killing the apt-cdrom process (Alt-F2, Enter, ps, find out the PID, kill the process). And for those crying that 'YOU CAN'T INSTALL JESSIE! THERE IS NO WAY..!' No matter how loud you are, you just are not right.