Bug#707567: marked as done (installation-reports: Wheezy i386 netinst fails installing base system: /var/cache/apt doesn't exist)

Your message dated Sat, 11 May 2013 16:08:47 +0100 with message-id <518e5eff.4040...@debianpt.org> and subject line Re: Bug#707567: Installation finally worked after repartitioning and formatting has caused the Debian Bug report #707567, regarding installation-reports: Wheezy i386 netinst fails in

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 635882 Bug #635882 [debootstrap] Cannot create base.tgz on Sid Bug #636023 [debootstrap] pbuilder fails to mount proc fs Marked Bug as done Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Processed: Re: Bug#707789: requested info

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 707789 flash-kernel Bug #707789 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: update-initramfs blocks with message "root device ubi0:rootfs does not exist" Bug reassigned from package 'initramfs-tools' to 'flash-kernel'. No longer marked as found i

Bug#707844: di-utils: No error message in case of wrong architecture

Package: di-utils Version: 1.92+deb7u1 Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, I've downloaded Debian 7.0 to use in a virtual machine. I downloaded an amd64 image, and by mistake used qemu for i386. I had the normal grub and then when selecting whether I wanted graphical or normal installation, it woul

Bug#707844: di-utils: No error message in case of wrong architecture

Dear Debian Bughunters: This, for me, raises the question of when I should report what, followed by, "How, adequately?" I've got a dev setup that pretty much lets me bang away until something works, then take snapshots when something interesting happens (e.g., major package install finishes, run

Bug#699390: debian-policy: soften the wording recommending menu files

Hi Russ, hi Sune, I'd like to second this request to reword the current section in the policy regarding menu files, suggesting fdo .desktop files as the recommended mechanism and make it clear that .menu files are only really relevant for legacy or more exotic window managers. Sune's patch looks f

Bug#707890: Boot sequence stalls with message "USB disconnect, device number"

Package: installation-reports Boot method: external USB hard drive Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.0.0/amd64/bt-dvd/ Date of install: around May 1, 2013 Machine: Apple iMac 12,1 (mid-2011 model, http://support.apple.com/kb/sp623) Processor: 2.5GHz quad-core Intel Core i5 Me

Debian installer build: failed or old builds

Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: amd64 May 12 00:07 buildd@barber build_cdrom_isolinux http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom_isolinux.log * FAILED BUILD: amd64 May 12 00:08 buildd@barber b

Bug#699390: debian-policy: soften the wording recommending menu files

On Sat 11 May 2013 21:04:01 Michael Biebl escribió: > Hi Russ, hi Sune, > > I'd like to second this request to reword the current section in the > policy regarding menu files, suggesting fdo .desktop files as the > recommended mechanism and make it clear that .menu files are only really > relevant

Re: partman-zfs

On May 11, 2013, at 12:25 AM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: > It seems that partman-zfs isn't quite finished. It > doesn't create a root filesystem. Only allows you to > create a volume, and on that put a root fs... > > I've added support for creating a root fs, setting the > 'bootfs' flag. I'm curren

Re: partman-zfs

(no need to CC me now : I'm subscribed to -boot and will follow this thread) Quoting Turbo Fredriksson (tu...@bayour.com): > On May 11, 2013, at 12:25 AM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: > > > It seems that partman-zfs isn't quite finished. It > > doesn't create a root filesystem. Only allows you to > >

Bug#707844: di-utils: No error message in case of wrong architecture

reassign 707844 debian-installer tags 70784 wontfix thanks Quoting Salvo Tomaselli (tipos...@tiscali.it): > Package: di-utils > Version: 1.92+deb7u1 > Severity: minor > > Dear Maintainer, > I've downloaded Debian 7.0 to use in a virtual machine. > > I downloaded an amd64 image, and by mistake us

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#707844: di-utils: No error message in case of wrong architecture

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 707844 debian-installer Bug #707844 [di-utils] di-utils: No error message in case of wrong architecture Bug reassigned from package 'di-utils' to 'debian-installer'. No longer marked as found in versions debian-installer-utils/1.92+deb7u1

Processed: tagging 707844

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 707844 + wontfix Bug #707844 [debian-installer] di-utils: No error message in case of wrong architecture Added tag(s) wontfix. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 707844: http://bugs.debian.org/c