On Mar 3, 2013, at 5:07 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 01:46:06PM -0800, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Mar 3, 2013, at 7:03 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Gah. Looking further, at the moment I don't see how (if at all) the
powerpc boot stuff passes through any of the kernel boot option
Is this a known problem? Is it related to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689722, which is
supposed to have been resolved?
Is there a workaround so that I can boot my machine? Or a version of
the installer that does not lead to this problem? Or a way of using the
installer?
Is
Package: debian-installer-launcher
Version: 14
Severity: normal
Steps to reproduce:
Boot
http://live.debian.net/cdimage/release/next/i386/iso-hybrid/debian-wheezy-live-rc1-i386-lxde-desktop.iso
Download and install debian-installer-launcher 14, as this image only
contains 13 which does not work
John Talbut (05/03/2013):
> Is this a known problem? Is it related to
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689722, which is
> supposed to have been resolved?
I don't think so.
> Is there a workaround so that I can boot my machine? Or a version
> of the installer that does not lea
Salut Emmanuel,
Emmanuel Thierry (03/03/2013):
> Indeed, maybe it should be documented.
might be a job for Samuel?
> Moreover, what is disturbing is that the parameter seams to be valid
> in a first time (Release files are downloaded successfully). It
> fails very lately at the end of base syst
Michael Gilbert (03/03/2013):
> Sorry, wrong terminology. Please consider approving a udeb-unblock
> for isc-dhcp.
unblock-udeb even.
Done in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696671#67
Also, you might have seen I was cc'd in:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
Christian PERRIER (05/03/2013):
> It probably needs a pre-approval by Cyril.
>
> I'm not deeply worried about this specific bug (adding "iw" to
> desktop and laptop) because we can release wheezy without that fix.
>
> I'm more worried about the network-manager-gnome addition to the
> gnome-deskt
Steven Chamberlain (04/02/2013):
> I've now tested the attached patch on kfreebsd-amd64, and it does fix
> the problem, which I could reproduce before only in these specific
> circumstances: […]
>
> * only in the GTK installer (netboot-9/gtk or cdrom/gtk; kfreebsd-i386
> doesn't have this)
> * >
On 05/03/13 20:31, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Want me to commit your patch to git, and upload that?
Yes, please! I almost forgot about this...
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
On 05/03/13 20:51, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> If the changelog message looks OK to you, I'll upload that later
> tonight.
Yep, it makes sense. Thank you.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
Thanks for the summary, and sorry for the lag.
Christian PERRIER (18/02/2013):
> yaboot-installer:
>
> - need more review.
I'll try and do that soonish.
> debian-installer-netboot-images:
>
> - wait RC1 release, then upload
>
> --> I have a ready upload
I guess that's OK.
> flash-kernel
Your message dated Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:17:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#699704: fixed in partman-base 164
has caused the Debian Bug report #699704,
regarding partman: Please don't load_extra on non-Linux
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Hi,
Raphaël Hertzog (04/03/2013):
> Package: apt-setup
> Version: 0.77
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> apt-setup keep the cdrom: entries in sources.list unless the cdrom is a
> netinst. More ofthen than not, those cdrom entries are not desired:
> - ISO images to install virtual machines d
partman-base_164_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-base_164.dsc
partman-base_164.tar.gz
partman-base_164_amd64.udeb
partman-utils_164_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Ben Hutchings (05/03/2013):
> efivars from 3.2.39-2 will fail to load against the kernel from
> 3.2.35-2. That basically breaks installation on UEFI from amd64
> netboot.
That one is slightly annoying… I guess we could add that to the d-i
errata page and point people there when they start compla
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 22:05:41 +0100
Source: partman-base
Binary: partman-base partman-utils
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 164
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Cyril
Your message dated Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:32:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#701884: fixed in ifupdown 0.7.40
has caused the Debian Bug report #701884,
regarding kfreebsd: unknown method 'inet6 auto'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Le Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 09:25:31PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
>
> Unless I'm missing something obvious, switching to “architecture: any”
> for some tasks should be OK.
Shall I upload with the attached patches applied ?
Cheers,
--
Charles
>From 92aea904ba8993ad20da026dbebd1dd67469252d Mon
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-CC: ttf-cjk-comp...@packages.debian.org
Hi,
Please unblock ttf-cjk-compact/1.20 since it improves some glyph lacks
in Japanese, Korean and Chinese language with graphical installer.
--
Regards
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
I just installed a new laptop with the Debian installer rc1.
I put the netinst img raw on a usbkey and boot from it.
First, I boot with the legacy BIOS. Here, the installer works
as always. I can access (with Alt-Fx) to two more consoles
(F2 and F3) and
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* OLD BUILD:s390x Feb 27 00:01 buildd@zemlinsky build_generic
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/s390x/daily/build_generic.log
* OLD BUILD:s390x Feb 27 00:01 buildd@zemlinsky build_tape
21 matches
Mail list logo
