Just to confirm that this bug still exists: I've just done an ordinary
(non-expert) installation toa Thinkpad T420 with the wheezy netinst iso
written to a USB drive with unetbootin, and grub was told to install to
/dev/sda (the USB drive) rather than /dev/sdb (the installation target),
which
I disabled network card in Virtual Box and installation succeeded
(using wheezy live rc1 amd64 gnome iso). I will try again with a
network card without its interface configured.
--
പ്രവീണ് അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില്
You have to keep reminding your government that you don't get your
rights from them; yo
Hi,
On 02/27/2013 05:28 PM, Torsten Jerzembeck wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 13:41:45 +0100, Torsten Jerzembeck wrote:
>>> Package: os-prober
>>> Version: 1.42
>>> Severity: grave
>>> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>>>
>>> While updating the kernel on a sto
I did not try it and I have no idea where that recovery image is .
It's true i didn't paid any taxes but it's because i'm a student :-D
2013/3/4 Leslie S Satenstein
> Two raesons. You did not pay your taxes for 2012
>
> or have you tried to boot with the DVD image recovery linux that is part
>
Installation succeeded with network card enabled but interface not
configured. Now let me try once again with a closer to real situation,
network is configured but no internet connection available.
--
പ്രവീണ് അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില്
You have to keep reminding your government that you don't get your
Isn't it a good idea to use lsof to determine what is being exported
through iscsi and avoid trying to mount it? Should I try to make the
patch for this?
--
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
On 04/03/13 06:20 AM, Praveen A wrote:
> package: live-installer
> version: 40
> severity: critical
>
> I downloaded debian-wheezy-live-rc1-amd64-gnome-desktop.iso and live
> installer just hangs when selecting "Install Debian Sid" from System
> Tools menu as seen in the screenshot. It was working
Hi,
> os-prober uses 'mount -o ro', or grub-mount from 1.45:
Please excuse me if this is trivial, but
'-o ro' does not prevent write access!
According to man:
"Note that, depending on the filesystem type, state and kernel
behavior, the system may still write to the device. For example,
Ext3 o
2013/3/4 Ben Armstrong :
> On 04/03/13 06:20 AM, Praveen A wrote:
>> package: live-installer
>> version: 40
>> severity: critical
>>
>> I downloaded debian-wheezy-live-rc1-amd64-gnome-desktop.iso and live
>> installer just hangs when selecting "Install Debian Sid" from System
>> Tools menu as seen
Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Mar 2013 14:35:09 +0100, a écrit :
> I'm pretty sure we could get one more upload from Samuel, if some translation
> work is done ;-)
Sure!
There have been work already so I do plan another upload.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 702226 debian-installer-launcher
Bug #702226 [live-installer] live-installer hangs when starting installation
from live system
Bug reassigned from package 'live-installer' to 'debian-installer-launcher'.
No longer marked as found in vers
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 700642 live-installer/40
Bug #700642 [live-installer] installation fails with unclean pkgcache
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #700642 to the same values
previously set
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Package: apt-setup
Version: 0.77
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
apt-setup keep the cdrom: entries in sources.list unless the cdrom is a
netinst. More ofthen than not, those cdrom entries are not desired:
- ISO images to install virtual machines do not want to rely on the
ISO image down the road
I tried to install it in virtualbox, I suceeded installing the debian
package without the network ports being enabled.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 700642
Bug #700642 {Done: Praveen A } [live-installer] installation
fails with unclean pkgcache
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #700642 to the same values
previously set
> found 700642 40
Bug #700642 [live-ins
reopen 700642
found 700642 40
thanks
wheezy live rc1 doesn't 'solve' this, that release just hasn't sid
configured in sources.list.d because we did not need to pin in live-* to
workaround having live-* not migrated to testing.
the original issue persists, reopening.
--
Address:Daniel Ba
I have, to-day, re-installed debian-wheezy-DI-rc1-i386-DVD.iso on the
same computer.
This time I did not plug the printer into the USB socket
However, I did plug in the USB mobile broadband device made by Huawei
before I started.
I chose alternative desktop KDE, and British English,
Then I used
Hi,
2013/3/4 :
> Hi,
>
>> os-prober uses 'mount -o ro', or grub-mount from 1.45:
>
> Please excuse me if this is trivial, but
> '-o ro' does not prevent write access!
> According to man:
>
> "Note that, depending on the filesystem type, state and kernel
> behavior, the system may still write t
Praveen,
What this comes down to is the b4 version of the image was inadvertently
built with extra material from sid due to an error in configuration (it
was intended that only the live-* packages be included from sid). This
problem was fixed in rc1, but that meant that it used all wheezy
versions
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:33:11AM +0100, Andreas Glaeser wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> See attachments for documentation.
> The boot-time error-message about microcode-update disappeared, but it still
> does not
> work. A different error-message shows in the dmesg-
Quoting Anup Kumar (allamsetty.a...@gmail.com):
> I tried to install it in virtualbox, I suceeded installing the debian
> package without the network ports being enabled.
So, well, feel free to close the bug report, then...:-)
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this action?
*
The bug Roland reported is real, and occurs in 2013 with Debian 6
installer. There should indeed be a distinction between an APT proxy and
a general-purpose HTTP proxy. Our APT proxy knows how to serve up files
related to Debian mirrors, but can't do general-purpose HTTP retrievals
such as pres
Hi,
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Mar 2013 14:35:09 +0100, a écrit :
> > I'm pretty sure we could get one more upload from Samuel, if some
> > translation
> > work is done ;-)
>
> Sure!
>
> There have been work already so I do plan another upload.
What do people think abo
Hi,
as noted on that page, it's unmaintained:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Today
I'm tempted to remove it altogether, as part of spring cleaning; not
maintained + somewhere after RC1 means it's not really useful anyway
during this part of the release cycle.
(Unless of course somebody
Hello,
Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Mar 2013 22:58:00 +0100, a écrit :
> What do people think about the finnish and catalan translation?
Right, we have waited long enough, I've disabled them.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Le Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 11:03:59PM +, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
> On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 13:51 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Quoting Charles Plessy (ple...@debian.org):
> >
> > > unfortunately it makes the package fail to build.
> > >
> > > dpkg-gencontrol: error: the Recommends field cont
Hi folks,
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Tasks is quite outdated. I'm
not sure whether it still makes sense to list all packages there, or
we should just list those with well-known maintainers. Or if that
makes sense at all.
For other tasks (everything unrelated to individual packages), I
Hello folks,
the FAQ page could use an update. Entries about Etch and Lenny,
floppies, etc. ;-)
Volunteers? It's here → http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/FAQ
Thanks already!
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
this looks like old history:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/LibraryUdebs
Time for removal? Any objections?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* OLD BUILD:s390x Feb 27 00:01 buildd@zemlinsky build_generic
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/s390x/daily/build_generic.log
* OLD BUILD:s390x Feb 27 00:01 buildd@zemlinsky build_tape
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 15:49 +, Richard Betham wrote:
> I have, to-day, re-installed debian-wheezy-DI-rc1-i386-DVD.iso on the
> same computer.
> This time I did not plug the printer into the USB socket
> However, I did plug in the USB mobile broadband device made by Huawei
> before I started.
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 09:01 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 11:03:59PM +, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
> > On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 13:51 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > > Quoting Charles Plessy (ple...@debian.org):
> > >
> > > > unfortunately it makes the package fail to bu
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Hi,
>
> as noted on that page, it's unmaintained:
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Today
>
> I'm tempted to remove it altogether, as part of spring cleaning; not
> maintained + somewhere after RC1 means it's not really useful anyway
> during
Quoting Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk):
> Just because a package is architecture: all, does not mean it has to be
> installable on all architectures.
>
> > Would that break something ? Otherwise, despite it looks unusual, I would
> > suggest to go ahead with architecture-dependant tasks if
Le mardi, 5 mars 2013 00.53:12, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> as noted on that page, it's unmaintained:
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Today
>
> I'm tempted to remove it altogether, as part of spring cleaning; not
> maintained + somewhere after RC1 means it's not really useful a
36 matches
Mail list logo
