Quoting Steven Chamberlain (ste...@pyro.eu.org):
> On 19:31, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > --- tasksel-3.14/debian/control 2012-10-30 19:08:23.0 +0100
> > +++ tasksel-3.14+nmu1/debian/control2013-01-31 19:17:35.0
> > +0100
> > @@ -72,7 +72,9 @@
> > Depends: ${misc:Depends}
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: debian-wheezy-DI-rc1-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 2013-02-24
Machine: Acer Aspire 7715
Processor: Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4400 @ 2.20GHz
Memory: 4GB
Partitions:
(partitioned manually, sda1 is / for Debian 6.0.7, sda3 is where I
tried insta
Dear Maintainer!
The problem, as I worked out, is an old-known problem about udev, where the
boot parameter "libata.atapi_passthru16=0" has to be set explicitly for some
hardware .
For further details see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622340
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
Adam D. Barratt (24/02/2013):
> I unblocked xorg-server for a kSBD fix to make the recent qt4-x11
> security fix work on that platform. Could I have a udeb ack to go with
> it, please?
As expected, no obvious regressions on linux, so d-i ack.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital sign
Julien Cristau (18/02/2013):
> grub2 and lvm2 in sid fix RC bugs, can I haz an ack for their
> unblock-udebs?
Both look OK to me, ack.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 25.02.2013 12:58, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Adam D. Barratt (24/02/2013):
I unblocked xorg-server for a kSBD fix to make the recent qt4-x11
security fix work on that platform. Could I have a udeb ack to go
with
it, please?
As expected, no obvious regressions on linux, so d-i ack.
Thanks;
Andreas Metzler (24/02/2013):
> FYI I have uploaded 1.5.0-5 about 30 minutes after 1.5.0-4, it adds
> another important fix. Looks like the upload happened at same time
> as the mirror push, delaying ACCEPT, otherwise there should not have
> been any duplicate work. Sorry.
Just echoing from IRC:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 14:04:28 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Julien Cristau (18/02/2013):
> > grub2 and lvm2 in sid fix RC bugs, can I haz an ack for their
> > unblock-udebs?
>
> Both look OK to me, ack.
>
Thanks, hints added.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Steve Langasek (06/02/2013):
> Apologies for taking as long as I have to get around to sending this mail.
Ditto for the reply.
> I would like to request an unblock of the udev udeb at version 175-7.1.
>
> unblock-udeb udev/175-7.1
>
> This package is a prerequisite for having a useful version
Adam D. Barratt (18/02/2013):
> pixman has a small fix for a security issue (CVE-2013-1591) and a udeb.
> Please could I have an {n,}ack for an unblock-udeb?
No obvious regression spotted in the graphical installer, d-i ack.
(Also, feel free to prod me more aggressively when dealing with
securit
On 25.02.2013 13:39, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Adam D. Barratt (18/02/2013):
pixman has a small fix for a security issue (CVE-2013-1591) and a
udeb.
Please could I have an {n,}ack for an unblock-udeb?
No obvious regression spotted in the graphical installer, d-i ack.
Thanks. unblock-udeb adde
Hi,
On 02/23/2013 02:14 AM, Holger Wansing wrote:
1) I used the 6.0.6 netboot installer (tried both 32-bit and 64-bit)
Could you try to reproduce this bug with the latest debian-installer being
prepared for 7.0 ? Take the mini.iso from
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/ins
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 02:01:09PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Steve Langasek (06/02/2013):
> > Apologies for taking as long as I have to get around to sending this mail.
> Ditto for the reply.
> > I would like to request an unblock of the udev udeb at version 175-7.1.
> >
> > unblock-udeb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 701656 -1
Bug #701656 [initramfs-tools] initramfs rescue shell doesn't recognize USB
keyboard
Bug 701656 cloned as bug 701681
> retitle 701656 Include current input drivers when MODULES=dep, to support
> rescue shell
Bug #701656 [initramfs
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #701201 [installation-reports] installation-reports
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
701201: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701201
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 10:42 +, Ralf Spengler wrote:
> Dear Maintainer!
>
> The problem, as I worked out, is an old-known problem about udev,
> where the boot parameter "libata.atapi_passthru16=0" has to be set
> explicitly for some hardware .
>
> For further details
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 10:23 +0100, Norbert Bollow wrote:
[...]
> Installtion seemed to go ok, but when starting the installed system, the
> screen
> went really really dark (not quite absolutely black, but almost). I've
> succeeded in sort of working around this problem by means of adding
>
> a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 701611 src:linux 3.2.35-2
Bug #701611 [installation-reports] Darkscreen problem
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'src:linux'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #701611 to the same values
previously set
With the amd64 netinst CD I have found a spot in the maze of helpful
"expert" options offered when the CD first boots that lets me choose
which Desktop Environment will be installed later on by tasksel. This
is really nice because it means I don't have to have a separate (and
much larger
26.02.2013 03:21, John Spencer wrote:
> [ quoting the full mail of lasse since it didnt make its way into the bb
> maillist yet ]
Additionally there has been a discussion and attempts to cook up a
patch in Debian, see http://bugs.debian.org/686502 , which I submitted
as a bug to busybox bugzilla
20 matches
Mail list logo
