Hello Christian,
Christian PERRIER (21/06/2012):
> Except running after last minute changes like netcfg last evening,
> yes..:-).
>
> I won't deactivate any language, though. OK, some of them are slightly
> incomplete for sublevels 1 and 2 and that doesn't exactly fit our
> release "rules" but I
Adam D. Barratt (22/06/2012):
> On 21.06.2012 21:08, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > As many of you know, we're tragically close to freeze. As a result,
> > the usual process of voting, debating and picking a theme via
> > consensus is not really possible. There was also a distinct lack of
> > interes
(adding -cd@)
Steve McIntyre (21/06/2012):
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:37:55AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > If there's nothing left on anyone's todo list, I'll try and release
> > beta 1 over the week-end. Will have to check if something needs be
> > done WRT upcoming kernel updates:
> >
console-setup_1.78_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
console-setup_1.78.dsc
console-setup_1.78.tar.gz
keyboard-configuration_1.78_all.deb
console-setup_1.78_all.deb
console-setup-mini_1.78_all.deb
console-setup-linux_1.78_all.deb
console-setup-free
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:25:52PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt (22/06/2012):
> > On 21.06.2012 21:08, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > > As many of you know, we're tragically close to freeze. As a result,
> > > the usual process of voting, debating and picking a theme via
> > > cons
Accepted:
bdf2psf_1.78_all.deb
to main/c/console-setup/bdf2psf_1.78_all.deb
console-setup-amiga-ekmap_1.78_all.udeb
to main/c/console-setup/console-setup-amiga-ekmap_1.78_all.udeb
console-setup-ataritt-ekmap_1.78_all.udeb
to main/c/console-setup/console-setup-ataritt-ekmap_1.78_all.udeb
co
Hello
Excerpt from Paul Tagliamonte:
-- --
> GRUB, GDM, KDM, Ksplash, KDE, plymouth all all have their changes done
> from desktop-base, so no need to play around with those packages, but
> who knows how a changed background will break stuff :)
At least for kdm there is this bug open:
kdm: log
Hi
Christian PERRIER writes:
> Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
>> Christian PERRIER (11/06/2012):
>> > It's likely that a mass upload is needed for l10n purposes. Also, I
>> > think that a beta is the moment where I should decide about which
>> > languages I drop
>> > (http://www.pe
Quoting Gaudenz Steinlin (gaud...@debian.org):
> > Except running after last minute changes like netcfg last evening,
> > yes..:-).
>
> Sorry if this upload was wrong according to the rules. I was acting
> under the premise that only strings in sublevels 1 and 2 were frozen. So
> I thought it is
apt-setup_0.65_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
apt-setup_0.65.dsc
apt-setup_0.65.tar.gz
apt-setup-udeb_0.65_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.65_all.udeb
apt-cdrom-setup_0.65_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on hos
network-console_1.35_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
network-console_1.35.dsc
network-console_1.35.tar.gz
network-console_1.35_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
apt-setup_0.65_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apt-setup_0.65.dsc
apt-setup_0.65.tar.gz
apt-setup-udeb_0.65_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.65_all.udeb
apt-cdrom-setup_0.65_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.deb
network-console_1.35_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
network-console_1.35.dsc
network-console_1.35.tar.gz
network-console_1.35_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
Accepted:
apt-cdrom-setup_0.65_all.udeb
to main/a/apt-setup/apt-cdrom-setup_0.65_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.65_all.udeb
to main/a/apt-setup/apt-mirror-setup_0.65_all.udeb
apt-setup-udeb_0.65_all.udeb
to main/a/apt-setup/apt-setup-udeb_0.65_all.udeb
apt-setup_0.65.dsc
to main/a/apt-setup
Accepted:
network-console_1.35.dsc
to main/n/network-console/network-console_1.35.dsc
network-console_1.35.tar.gz
to main/n/network-console/network-console_1.35.tar.gz
network-console_1.35_i386.udeb
to main/n/network-console/network-console_1.35_i386.udeb
Changes:
network-console (1.35)
cdebconf_0.168_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.168.dsc
cdebconf_0.168.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.168_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.168_i386.deb
cdebconf-gtk_0.168_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.168_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.168_i
cdebconf_0.168_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.168.dsc
cdebconf_0.168.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.168_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.168_i386.deb
cdebconf-gtk_0.168_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.168_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.168_i386.deb
cd
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Hello,
I was trying to install using netinstall or businesscard or
netinst+firmware images of wheezy/testing on IBM xSeries x366 server
and ended with serious DMA error when using tg3 driver with
Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5704 Gigabit Ethernet
Accepted:
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.168_i386.udeb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.168_i386.udeb
cdebconf-gtk_0.168_i386.deb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk_0.168_i386.deb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.168_i386.udeb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.168_i386.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.168_all.u
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
cdebconf-gtk_0.168_i386.deb: package says priority is extra, override says
optional.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 23:29:25, the fi
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 23:24:25, the fi
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 23:19:24, the fi
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 23:14:24, the fi
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 23:09:24, the fi
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 23:04:24, the fi
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 22:59:24, the fi
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 22:54:23, the fi
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 22:49:23, the fi
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 22:44:23, the fi
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 22:39:23, the fi
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 22:34:23, the fi
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 22:29:23, the fi
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 22:24:22, the fi
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 22:19:22, the fi
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 22:14:22, the fi
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 22:09:22, the fi
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 22:04:22, the fi
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 21:59:22, the fi
Hi
Christian PERRIER writes:
> Quoting Gaudenz Steinlin (gaud...@debian.org):
>
> Please remember that these changes have to be documented in the
> release notes, too
Do you mean the release notes or the installation guide? I have a patch
for the installation guide ready documenting the ch
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 21:54:22, the fi
Quoting Gaudenz Steinlin (gaud...@soziologie.ch):
>
> Hi
>
> Christian PERRIER writes:
>
> > Quoting Gaudenz Steinlin (gaud...@debian.org):
> >
> > Please remember that these changes have to be documented in the
> > release notes, too
>
> Do you mean the release notes or the installation g
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 21:49:22, the fi
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 21:44:22, the fi
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 21:39:22, the fi
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 21:34:21, the fi
Hi,
We would like to test the new functionality of xorriso, that is
ISO9660/HFS hybrid images, therefore we would need some testers
who are willing to build and try to boot images on powerpc machines,
at least those supported by Debian. This might also include
downloading some large files, detecti
netcfg_1.76_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_1.76_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
netcfg_1.76_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_1.76_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boo
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
I just blacklisted rootskel-gtk on s390 and s390x through P-a-s. On s390 it did
not build due to it being in not-for-us. This was not copied over to s390x.
Please remove the binary from unstable, thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@l
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:53:52PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
> > I'm not, I'm just looking at grep-excuses, which suggests either
> > klibc-utils-floppy-udeb should exist on ia64 or rootskel-bootfloppy
> > should be killed there.
>
> Quite likely rooskel-bootfloppy and klibc-
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Lenny is no longer supported, hence this package (part of d-i) is no longer
needed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.deb
Accepted:
netcfg-static_1.76_i386.udeb
to main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_1.76_i386.udeb
netcfg_1.76.dsc
to main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.76.dsc
netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
to main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.76.tar.gz
netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
to main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.76_i386.udeb
Changes:
netcfg (1.76) unstable; urg
kickseed_0.58_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kickseed_0.58.dsc
kickseed_0.58.tar.gz
kickseed-common_0.58_all.udeb
initrd-kickseed_0.58_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Accepted:
initrd-kickseed_0.58_all.udeb
to main/k/kickseed/initrd-kickseed_0.58_all.udeb
kickseed-common_0.58_all.udeb
to main/k/kickseed/kickseed-common_0.58_all.udeb
kickseed_0.58.dsc
to main/k/kickseed/kickseed_0.58.dsc
kickseed_0.58.tar.gz
to main/k/kickseed/kickseed_0.58.tar.gz
Ch
Package: kernel-wedge
Version: 2.84
gen-control makes each package field specified per-arch/flavour override
the default.
gen-deps seems to effectively merge Depends from the default and
per-arch/flavour.
This means that copy-modules has an incorrect view of which package
dependencies have been
Hi #482092,
I am pinging this bug because I would really like to see xts in wheezy.
We (riseup.net) have been using serpent:xts-plain for our systems for
both lenny and squeeze and it works great. Until now we have had to do
some hacking to get d-i to set it up,
* drop to a shell
* wget the xts.ko
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jun 22 17:47 debian-cd@pettersson Dsource
http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/Dsource
* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jun 22 17:47 debian-cd@pettersson 9source
netcfg_1.77_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
netcfg_1.77.dsc
netcfg_1.77.tar.gz
netcfg_1.77_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_1.77_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
netcfg_1.77_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_1.77.dsc
netcfg_1.77.tar.gz
netcfg_1.77_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_1.77_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boo
Accepted:
netcfg-static_1.77_i386.udeb
to main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_1.77_i386.udeb
netcfg_1.77.dsc
to main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.77.dsc
netcfg_1.77.tar.gz
to main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.77.tar.gz
netcfg_1.77_i386.udeb
to main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.77_i386.udeb
Changes:
netcfg (1.77) unstable; urg
61 matches
Mail list logo
