Processing of rootskel_1.99_amd64.changes

2011-12-31 Thread Debian FTP Masters
rootskel_1.99_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rootskel_1.99.dsc rootskel_1.99.tar.gz rootskel_1.99_amd64.udeb rootskel-bootfloppy_1.99_amd64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

rootskel_1.99_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2011-12-31 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: rootskel-bootfloppy_1.99_amd64.udeb to main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_1.99_amd64.udeb rootskel_1.99.dsc to main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.99.dsc rootskel_1.99.tar.gz to main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.99.tar.gz rootskel_1.99_amd64.udeb to main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.99_amd64.udeb

Bug#653840: rootskel-bootfloppy: depends on unavailable klibc-utils-floppy-udeb on ia64

2011-12-31 Thread Julien Cristau
Package: rootskel-bootfloppy Version: 1.98 Severity: grave britney says: rootskel-bootfloppy/ia64 unsatisfiable Depends: klibc-utils-floppy-udeb (>= 1.5-2) Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l

Bug#653513: debian-installer: build/README lies, code says: USE_UDEBS_FROM ?= unstable

2011-12-31 Thread Joey Hess
Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Daily builds are defined nowhere, so it can't be concluded whether > running “make build_something” under build/ is considered a daily build. > (Or maybe the intent was to document that daily builds are the reasons > for the default's being unstable. I guess it can be under

Processed: limit source to kernel-wedge, tagging 653500

2011-12-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #kernel-wedge (2.74+squeeze4) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > # > # * Add isci to scsi-extra-modules. CLoses: #653500 > # > limit source kernel-wedge Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'kernel-wedge' Limit currently set to

Bug#653576: marked as done (base-installer: When a device needs a non-free package, the displayed message isn't very user-friendly)

2011-12-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Dec 2011 12:07:40 -0400 with message-id <20111231160740.gd5...@gnu.kitenet.net> and subject line Re: Bug#653576: base-installer: When a device needs a non-free package, the displayed message isn't very user-friendly has caused the Debian Bug report #653576, regarding bas

Bug#653840: rootskel-bootfloppy: depends on unavailable klibc-utils-floppy-udeb on ia64

2011-12-31 Thread Joey Hess
Julien Cristau wrote: > rootskel-bootfloppy/ia64 unsatisfiable Depends: klibc-utils-floppy-udeb > (>= 1.5-2) This is not a new dependency, it's from 2008 and klibc-utils-floppy-udeb is not built on ia64. But why are you trying to use boot floppies, let alone on ia64 anyway? -- see shy jo

Bug#653669: Installation failed with BTRFS

2011-12-31 Thread Joey Hess
Miguel Figueiredo wrote: > i tried to install the businesscard image and also failed while using btrfs. > The installation log was full of btrfs kernel errors, these errors > repeated itself until installation fails reporting no space left on > device. > I trimmed the 22 MB log, with the first 2000

Bug#653840: rootskel-bootfloppy: depends on unavailable klibc-utils-floppy-udeb on ia64

2011-12-31 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Joey Hess (31/12/2011): > But why are you trying to use boot floppies, let alone on ia64 anyway? You left out “britney” in your quote. That one: http://release.debian.org/tools.html Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#653840: rootskel-bootfloppy: depends on unavailable klibc-utils-floppy-udeb on ia64

2011-12-31 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:14:20 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Julien Cristau wrote: > > rootskel-bootfloppy/ia64 unsatisfiable Depends: klibc-utils-floppy-udeb > > (>= 1.5-2) > > This is not a new dependency, it's from 2008 and klibc-utils-floppy-udeb > is not built on ia64. > > But why are yo

Re: Adding ISO-search support to the CD (netinst) images?

2011-12-31 Thread Joey Hess
Evgeni Golov wrote: > How to use: > boot as cdrom > > OR > grub2: > loopback loop /debian-7.0-amd64-NETINST-findiso.iso > set root=(loop) > linux /install.amd/vmlinux findiso > initrd /install.amd/initrd.gz > boot > > OR > kvm: > kvm -kernel dest/cdrom/vmlinuz -initrd dest/cdrom/initrd.gz

Processed: severity of 653840 is normal

2011-12-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # old bug, apparently > severity 653840 normal Bug #653840 [rootskel-bootfloppy] rootskel-bootfloppy: depends on unavailable klibc-utils-floppy-udeb on ia64 Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#653840: rootskel-bootfloppy: depends on unavailable klibc-utils-floppy-udeb on ia64

2011-12-31 Thread Joey Hess
Julien Cristau wrote: > I'm not, I'm just looking at grep-excuses, which suggests either > klibc-utils-floppy-udeb should exist on ia64 or rootskel-bootfloppy > should be killed there. Quite likely rooskel-bootfloppy and klibc-utils-floppy-udeb should be killed *everywhere*. It's not like the kern

Processed: limit source to rootskel, tagging 653840

2011-12-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #rootskel (1.100) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > # > # * Remove rootskel-bootfloppy. The age of the floppy is officially over. > #Closes: #653840 > # > limit source rootskel Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'rootskel

Re: Adding ISO-search support to the CD (netinst) images?

2011-12-31 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:30:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Evgeni Golov wrote: > > grub2: > > loopback loop /debian-7.0-amd64-NETINST-findiso.iso > > set root=(loop) > > linux /install.amd/vmlinux findiso > > initrd /install.amd/initrd.gz > > boot > > So for this to work, the user has to go