30.07.2011 01:06, Ralf Jung wrote:
> Machine: HP Compaq 615
> Processor: AMD Athlon(tm)X2 DualCore QL-66
> Memory: 4 GiB
> Partitions:
>Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/sda1 *2048 1228761438976 83 Linux
> /dev/sda2 12288 1310
After installing squeeze on a new disk, booting failed because the
kernel was unable to find the root device. This is a report of soome
things that went wrong and some work-arounds. My main motivation it to
highlight some areas that seem to need improvement. I don't need help,
since I (think I'
tags 576309 pending
thanks
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 09:35:03AM -0300, Eriberto wrote:
> 2010/4/3 Christian PERRIER :
> > - the original English talks about "extended partition" which seems to
> > have been translated to "partição estendida" in the installer.
>
> Right. But you can't put data into
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 576309 pending
Bug #576309 [grub-installer] Should consider rewording grub-installer templates
to abetter fit 2010 device names
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
576309: h
Hi,
> Can you verify this by clearing the boot flag you now
> have and seeing if your system will boot after that?
Yes, I tried that: The system showed exactly the same error about not being
able to find a bootable device if the boot flag is unset, and after setting it
again, things now work lik
Hi
I've now uploaded the package. Please see the attached NMU patch.
Gaudenz
Excerpts from Gaudenz Steinlin's message of 2011-07-30 04:08:32 +0200:
> Excerpts from Kel Modderman's message of 2011-07-30 01:44:07 +0200:
> > On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 06:25:00 AM Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > > Excerpts fr
Package: finish-install
Version: 2.32
Severity: normal
finish-install 90console script checks for the existence of
/sys/bus/xen to determine whether to add a console on
/dev/hvc0 - but in 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 this always appears to exist.
The effect is an "init id co respawned too fast, disabling fo
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 14:10 +0100, Dominic Benson wrote:
> Package: finish-install
> Version: 2.32
> Severity: normal
>
> finish-install 90console script checks for the existence of
> /sys/bus/xen to determine whether to add a console on
> /dev/hvc0 - but in 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 this always appears t
(please keep 636...@bugs.debian.org CC'd so this conversation is
recorded on the bug)
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 14:43 +0100, Dominic Benson wrote:
> On 30 Jul 2011, at 14:40, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 14:10 +0100, Dominic Benson wrote:
> >> Package: finish-install
> >> Version:
On 30 Jul 2011, at 14:56, Ian Campbell wrote:
> (please keep 636...@bugs.debian.org CC'd so this conversation is
> recorded on the bug)
Sorry - missed that last time.
>
> On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 14:43 +0100, Dominic Benson wrote:
>> On 30 Jul 2011, at 14:40, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 20
On 07/30/2011 06:23 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Otavio
> During this night I got some nice progress on the stuff planned to
> debian-installer. I am adding the generated control file for review
> and comments.
>
> Basically it gather all udebs included on the initrd and puts this
> in
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 15:28 +0100, Dominic Benson wrote:
> On 30 Jul 2011, at 14:56, Ian Campbell wrote:
> I attach a patch that I've used (against 2.22). It does, for me,
> prevent the problem on systems that I can test.
>
> I tried it under Citrix Xencenter, and the inittab entry for this
> con
On 07/28/2011 01:18 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I used some of Debcamp and Debconf time this year to discuss the
> Debian Installer release process with some people and after talking
> with many people it seems we agreed on the following changes on Debian
> Installer release process and it would b
On 30 Jul 2011, at 15:57, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 15:28 +0100, Dominic Benson wrote:
>>
>> OK. I'm not really sure under what real circumstances it would be entered.
>>
>> My concern was that, if it is used, as /sys/bus/xen and /dev/hvc0 must
>> both exist, two inittab line
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 16:36, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 07/30/2011 06:23 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Basically it gather all udebs included on the initrd and puts this
>> information in the Built-Using field of the binary package.
>>
>> Comments, welcome :-)
>
> Great start, though Built-Using expe
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 17:04, Luk Claes wrote:
...
>> * Debian Installer daily builds to be done from source uploads
>>
>> The daily builds will use the archive source for building so every
>> time we do a change in unstable in a module that is included in initrd
>> it will trigger a binNMU i
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 17:05, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 16:36, Luk Claes wrote:
>> On 07/30/2011 06:23 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>> Basically it gather all udebs included on the initrd and puts this
>>> information in the Built-Using field of the binary package.
>>>
>>>
Hello
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 15:10, Dominic Benson
wrote:
> Package: finish-install
> Version: 2.32
> Severity: normal
>
> finish-install 90console script checks for the existence of
> /sys/bus/xen to determine whether to add a console on
> /dev/hvc0 - but in 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 this always appears
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 17:18:28 +0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 17:05, Otavio Salvador
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 16:36, Luk Claes wrote:
> >> On 07/30/2011 06:23 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >>> Basically it gather all udebs included on the initrd and puts th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 635968 grub-installer
Bug #635968 [installation-reports] installation-reports: Initial boot after
installation failed
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'grub-installer'.
> tags 635968 + pending
Bug #635968 [grub-insta
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 17:18:28 +0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
>> So I got it done; please take a look at it.
>>
> Looks sane from a quick look. Can we also see the code that generates
> this, maybe?
FYI, I did this in win32-loader (but not pushed yet as my smartcard
Ralf Jung wrote:
>> So far, I for one haven't seen a system which requires a
>> partition _table_ to boot, not to mention a bootable
>> partition in it. BIOS merely loads first 512 bytes of
>> a disk into memory and jumps into that area, without
>> trying to interpret what's inside. Unless you us
---
debian/changelog |1 +
debian/rules |6 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 5a53ac8..cb9c975 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ debian-installer (2011) UNRELEASED; ur
---
build/Makefile |7 +++
build/util/write-built-using |8
debian/changelog |2 ++
debian/control |1 +
debian/rules |3 +++
5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 build/util/wr
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 17:54, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Looks sane from a quick look. Can we also see the code that generates
> this, maybe?
I sent the two patches I have queued to push to mailing list; please
comment on them.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail:
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
> Mostly; the only addition situation we'll need to rebuild the
> installer is when the amount of translation changes for a specific
> language so we get the 'translation-status' file updated into the
> initrd.
We might need to find a way to avoi
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 22:12, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
>> Mostly; the only addition situation we'll need to rebuild the
>> installer is when the amount of translation changes for a specific
>> language so we get the 'translation-status' file up
Hi,
i've just tried the businesscard images for amd64 and i386 under Virtualbox.
amd64 works as expected, the console appears with the mounted filesystem.
i386 doesn't throw a shell to the mounted partition as expected, but the
filesystem is mounted in /target.
In both logs appears the followin
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:47:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#576309: fixed in grub-installer 1.66
has caused the Debian Bug report #576309,
regarding Should consider rewording grub-installer templates to abetter fit
2010 device names
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:47:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#635968: fixed in grub-installer 1.66
has caused the Debian Bug report #635968,
regarding installation-reports: Initial boot after installation failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
grub-installer_1.66_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
grub-installer_1.66.dsc
grub-installer_1.66.tar.gz
grub-installer_1.66_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
Accepted:
grub-installer_1.66.dsc
to main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.66.dsc
grub-installer_1.66.tar.gz
to main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.66.tar.gz
grub-installer_1.66_amd64.udeb
to main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.66_amd64.udeb
Override entries for your package:
grub
We held a meeting during debconf discussing policy on things which
multiarch enables: partial architectures,
cross-compilers in the archive, cross-comiled uploads, and a few other
things.
I've posted the meeting notes here:
http://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Debconf11MultiarchRelatedMinutes
reprod
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* FAILED BUILD: mipsel Jul 31 00:06 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial.log
* FAILED BUILD: mipsel Jul 31
34 matches
Mail list logo
