On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:33:39AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
> > > 'Urgent bug fixes', or something to that effect?
> > They're not only bug fixes but also database updates and like.
> > Important system updates?
> One might argue that they
Quoting Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org):
> ### i18n
>
> There are many language tasks in tasksel. It might be good to have
> the task packages be moved out of tasksel; I don't know if it'd make
> sense to have individual language teams maintain them, or what.
Many teams are definitely too small to
Quoting Matthew Palmer (mpal...@debian.org):
> I'm rather hesitant to introduce this sort of tight coupling between
> packages; it makes things brittle and prone to breakage. On the other hand,
> I know how hard it is to be able to detect network state, and changes to
> what netcfg does in the fu
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
> In this bug report, it is originally proposed that the RTC is
> considered to be set at local time when Solaris is detected.
>
> So, in his first patch, Colin proposed to do this when Solaris is
> detected. However, the later discussion suggested t
Package: apt-setup
Version: 1:0.53
Severity: important
Hi,
Thanks very much for including my rather last minute apt-setup patch to
add $codename-updates to sources.list when volatile is selected for >=
squeeze installs.
Unfortunately, the behaviour is somewhat suboptimal when an install is
perfo
Le jeudi 17 février 2011 à 19:20 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
> ### gnome
>
> Would the gnome team want to maintain a task-gnome?
> Much of tasksel's gnome task is already taken from the gnome-core
> and gnome metapackages, with a few more things added.
Yes, they fit globally the same purpose. Th
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 08:30:17AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> (Moving to debian-boot@lists.debian.org where it's more appropriate)
>
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2011, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > During Squeeze installation process, since volatile archive was
> > replaced with squeeze-updates
Hi.
Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 08:30 +0100, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> (Moving to debian-boot@lists.debian.org where it's more appropriate)
>
(Sorry about the noise, as I'm subscribed to that list, reponding to
-devel too anyway).
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2011, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
>
[Not sure whether we should keep the long To: - list, I'd suggest
continuing on debian-devel but keep it for the moment.]
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 07:20:30PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> A long time ago, tasksel installed task packages, which were regular
> metapackages. This was dropped because the
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.89
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
the changelog of xorg-server (2:1.9.4-2) reveals the following:
In a nutshell, one may want to choose between installing:
- xserver-xorg-core: the server itself, with no strings attached.
- xserver-xorg: pulls the server and drivers
Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:44:30 -0500
with message-id <20110218094430.34ebb...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#613899: Prober does not add Grub 2 boot entries for
OS's on SW RAID1 filesystems
has caused the Debian Bug report #613899,
regarding Prober does not add Grub 2 boot
The script itself seems ok but I didn't test it yet.
It seems to me os-prober only runs the mounted/ probes that are executable, and
the os-probes/mounted/x86/83haiku script is not executable in the archive at:
ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.43.tar.gz
Therefore I highly d
Package: kernel-wedge
Severity: wishlist
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hello,
The initrd of the Debian installer currently support FAT, ISO 9660 and
Ext2/3 and ReiserFS for loading stuff, for instance when using hd-media
(to find udebs) or netboot (to find firmwares for one's f.
Does anyone know what happened to kfreebsd-* daily builds? It seems
after Feb 5th they haven't been updated:
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-i386/daily/
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.
Fabian Greffrath, le Fri 18 Feb 2011 15:37:38 +0100, a écrit :
> Currently the desktop task of tasksel installs the whole xorg package and thus
> pulls in a lot of utility packages. I think tasksel should only install the
> xserver-xorg package instead. I mean, do we really need twm and xcalc when
/s390-netdevice_0.0.28_s390.changes is already present on target host:
s390-netdevice_0.0.28_s390.udeb
Either you already uploaded it, or someone else came first.
Job s390-netdevice_0.0.28_s390.changes removed.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
Hi everyone, hope you're OK.
Just can anyone explain these two:
1) -- How do we make things start on boot in kfreebsd? Is there any special
/etc/init.d script to start each thing?Things like PF packet filter.
In FreeBSD we have that file /etc/rc.conf where we define such things.
2) -- How do we
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 15:37:38 +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Currently the desktop task of tasksel installs the whole xorg package and thus
> pulls in a lot of utility packages. I think tasksel should only install the
> xserver-xorg package instead. I mean, do we really need twm and xcalc whe
On 18 February 2011 16:38, François Revol wrote:
> The script itself seems ok but I didn't test it yet.
>
> It seems to me os-prober only runs the mounted/ probes that are executable,
> and the os-probes/mounted/x86/83haiku script is not executable in the archive
> at:
> ftp.debian.org/debian/po
Hi,
Please drop debian-boot from CC in your reply (this is off-topic there)
2011/2/18 Kostya Berger :
> Just can anyone explain these two:
> 1) -- How do we make things start on boot in kfreebsd? Is there any special
> /etc/init.d script to start each thing?Things like PF packet filter.
> In Free
Am Freitag, den 18.02.2011, 18:01 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> You'll admit that the weight of twm, xcalc etc. is not very high.
Sure, but I consider them obsolete on a system that has Gnome or Kde
installed. And please remember that the release notes had to get deleted
from CD1 for some reaso
Le 18 févr. 2011 à 19:03, Jeroen Oortwijn a écrit :
> On 18 February 2011 16:38, François Revol wrote:
>> The script itself seems ok but I didn't test it yet.
>>
>> It seems to me os-prober only runs the mounted/ probes that are executable,
>> and the os-probes/mounted/x86/83haiku script is no
Fabian Greffrath (18/02/2011):
> Hm, maybe I should reassign this request to the xfs and ask them to
> rearrange the packages again so that at least one of them provides
> all the necessary parts that you described.
(X Font Server? No.)
I think xorg-server's changelog is pretty clear on what you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 380105 502795
Bug#380105: Show current hour in hardware clock question
Bug#502795: debian-installer: "Is system clock set to UTC?" dialog should
display the current system clock.
Forcibly Merged 380105 502795.
> thanks
Stopping proces
Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:25:48 +0100
with message-id <20110218182548.gs3...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line First fail on devices that take time to settle is more or less
"by design"
has caused the Debian Bug report #542118,
regarding Consistently fails to find ISO image
Fabian Greffrath, le Fri 18 Feb 2011 19:27:00 +0100, a écrit :
> Am Freitag, den 18.02.2011, 18:01 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> > You'll admit that the weight of twm, xcalc etc. is not very high.
>
> Sure, but I consider them obsolete on a system that has Gnome or Kde
> installed. And please r
Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:18:23 +0100
with message-id <20110218181823.gr3...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Bug fixed by fix for #548128
has caused the Debian Bug report #557004,
regarding pam forces to change password if modification were done on day 0
to be marked as do
On 18 February 2011 19:35, François Revol wrote:
>
> Le 18 févr. 2011 à 19:03, Jeroen Oortwijn a écrit :
>
>> On 18 February 2011 16:38, François Revol wrote:
>>> The script itself seems ok but I didn't test it yet.
>>>
>>> It seems to me os-prober only runs the mounted/ probes that are executabl
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 15:37:38 +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>
> > Currently the desktop task of tasksel installs the whole xorg package and
> > thus
> > pulls in a lot of utility packages. I think tasksel should only install the
> > xserver-xorg package instead. I mean
/s390-netdevice_0.0.28_s390.changes is already present on target host:
s390-netdevice_0.0.28_s390.udeb
Either you already uploaded it, or someone else came first.
Job s390-netdevice_0.0.28_s390.changes removed.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
Hi again,
Adam D. Barratt (18/02/2011):
> Okay; thanks. Please go ahead.
thanks.
I'm sorry, I totally forgot to mention it has an udeb. I'm Cc-ing
-boot@ accordingly. That shouldn't affect g-i in any way, though.
Otavio/-boot@: the thread started here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release
> I also saw this error message but only under special circumstances. I
> believe when I installed from a DVD and selected to not use a mirror.
Yes, this is how to run into this error.
> It's still somewhat disturbing. Maybe we should keep an empty "stable"
> archive on volatile.debian.org in the
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 20:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
...
> Otavio/-boot@: the thread started here:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/02/msg00286.html
...
It is OK for us.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossyst
On 02/18/2011 09:02 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:33:39AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
'Urgent bug fixes', or something to that effect?
>>> They're not only bug fixes but also database updates and like.
>>> Importa
Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:20:41 +
with message-id <201102182220.41369.el...@debianpt.org>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #214790,
regarding discover hangs on closing serial port
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:20:41 +
with message-id <201102182220.41369.el...@debianpt.org>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #214790,
regarding discover: hangs while reading /dev/ttyS1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: os-prober
Version: 1.39ppa1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
As promised: 83BeOS; a BeOS os-prober module
Tested with a fresh installation of BeOS R5.
(Send with reportbug, so I wonder if the double dot is back.)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers maverick-u
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:19:23PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 02/18/2011 09:02 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:33:39AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> >> Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
> 'Urgent bug fixes', or something to that effect?
> >>> They'
Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:44:01 +
with message-id <201102182244.01852.el...@debianpt.org>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #375926,
regarding discover: Fails to detect and modprobe lp driver is parport is found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On 18 February 2011 23:24, Jeroen Oortwijn wrote:
> As promised: 83BeOS; a BeOS os-prober module
>
> Tested with a fresh installation of BeOS R5.
>
> (Send with reportbug, so I wonder if the double dot is back.)
Well, it turns out reportbug changes the attachment (one dot -> double
dot) when you
Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:46:07 +
with message-id <201102182246.07745.el...@debianpt.org>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #246124,
regarding discover1: ide-cd module is not loaded automatically
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:47:00 +
with message-id <201102182247.01004.el...@debianpt.org>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #249346,
regarding discover1: Mouse module isn't loaded when using 2.6 kernel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:48:08 +
with message-id <201102182248.08119.el...@debianpt.org>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #375983,
regarding discover1: Uses deprecated PCMCIA ioctl interface
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:48:08 +
with message-id <201102182248.08119.el...@debianpt.org>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #375983,
regarding discover: deprecated PCMCIA ioctl usage
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:48:55 +
with message-id <201102182248.55719.el...@debianpt.org>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #415400,
regarding discover1: modules described in configuration should have '-'
replaced by '_'
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:50:45 +
with message-id <201102182250.45855.el...@debianpt.org>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #360719,
regarding Entries in exception lists should overrule default lists
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Le 18 févr. 2011 à 23:46, Jeroen Oortwijn a écrit :
> On 18 February 2011 23:24, Jeroen Oortwijn wrote:
>> As promised: 83BeOS; a BeOS os-prober module
>>
>> Tested with a fresh installation of BeOS R5.
>>
>> (Send with reportbug, so I wonder if the double dot is back.)
>
> Well, it turns out
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* FAILED BUILD: armel Feb 18 21:54 joey@box build_iop32x_netboot
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log
* FAILED BUILD: armel Feb 18 21:55 joey@box
bu
Quoting Philipp Kern (pk...@debian.org):
> Sure. But iso-codes most certainly won't qualify? Also database updates is
> quite a stretch. tzdata, yeah, but the case there's somewhat different.
You're right: it probably won't qualify and point releases are
probably enough.
This discussion still
Hello, Debian Install System Team,
I have a strange bug with console-setup. I use Debian (installed squeeze 6.0,
then upgraded to sid), linux kernel 2.6.37-1, console-setup 1.69 and a
framebuffer that comes by default.
Problem: when i did 'sudo dpkg-reconfigure console-setup' and chose some
set
os-prober_1.44_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
os-prober_1.44.dsc
os-prober_1.44.tar.gz
os-prober-udeb_1.44_i386.udeb
os-prober_1.44_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRI
os-prober_1.44_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
os-prober_1.44.dsc
os-prober_1.44.tar.gz
os-prober-udeb_1.44_i386.udeb
os-prober_1.44_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Accepted:
os-prober-udeb_1.44_i386.udeb
to main/o/os-prober/os-prober-udeb_1.44_i386.udeb
os-prober_1.44.dsc
to main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.44.dsc
os-prober_1.44.tar.gz
to main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.44.tar.gz
os-prober_1.44_i386.deb
to main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.44_i386.deb
Overri
Hello again,
I've found that some space at the left is lost even in X, so i've tried
pressing "Auto" on the monitor, and problem was solved. Even after reboot and
change of console-setup settings, characters are displayed normally.
The error itself was produced after i've updated from squeeze t
54 matches
Mail list logo
