On 18 February 2011 19:35, François Revol <re...@free.fr> wrote: > > Le 18 févr. 2011 à 19:03, Jeroen Oortwijn a écrit : > >> On 18 February 2011 16:38, François Revol <re...@free.fr> wrote: >>> The script itself seems ok but I didn't test it yet. >>> >>> It seems to me os-prober only runs the mounted/ probes that are executable, >>> and the os-probes/mounted/x86/83haiku script is not executable in the >>> archive at: >>> ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.43.tar.gz >>> Therefore I highly doubt it is run at all. >>> I also checked in the .deb, it's not executable either : >>> -rw-r--r-- 0 root root 815 18 fév 06:02 >>> ./usr/lib/os-probes/mounted/83haiku >> >> That's strange, it was executable when I attached it to my email. >> >>> Beside, even though BeOS itself is proprietary and commercially dead, some >>> people still have it on their machine, so it would still be useful to have >>> it supported too. >> >> Yes, I intend to make a similar script for BeOS; but I have to install >> it first on my computer. >> I also noticed a small error in the 83haiku script: on line 23, "$2" >> should be "$mpoint" > > And this > .. /usr/share/os-prober/common.sh > > (double dot ??)
It's getting stranger and stranger. My local 83haiku file has one dot and also the first 83haiku I uploaded has only one, but the second one does indeed have a double dot. I have no idea how that happened (but I have a feeling that reportbug has something to do with it). Attached is the final 83haiku script: no double dot; "$mpoint" instead of "$2" and executable bit set (although I doubt that it will carry over by email). - Jeroen
83Haiku
Description: Binary data
