On Fri,21.May.10, 23:39:00, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Fri,21.May.10, 22:02:31, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Quoting Andrei Popescu (andreimpope...@gmail.com):
> > >
> > > According to [1] I should have push permission, since I have permissions
> > > also for d-i (being one of the Romanian transl
Bjørn Mork, le Wed 26 May 2010 10:45:49 +0200, a écrit :
> Just comparing http://git.kernel.org/?p=boot/syslinux/syslinux.git with
> http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/grub/trunk/grub/ should IMHO give more
> than enough information to choose extlinux over grub2
I don't understand what you mean her
Package: tasksel
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i l10n patch
Hello,
Since openoffice.org and openoffice.org-l10n-ro only suggest hunspell-ro
it is worth adding it to the romanian-desktop task.
Patch attached.
Regards,
Andrei
>From 1e96e349bf25f0455865d5e1824e843acfd3e73c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
F
Quoting Petter Reinholdtsen (p...@alioth.debian.org):
> Author: pere
> Date: Tue May 25 19:29:55 2010
> New Revision: 63315
>
> Log:
> Handle driver disk udeb translations using po files.
>
> Modified:
>trunk/packages/hw-detect/debian/po/POTFILES.in
>
> Modified: trunk/packages/hw-detect/deb
[Christian PERRIER]
> Yikes. We apparently never reviewed the wording of these templates
> (I didn't even know that they existed) and, guess what, I think they
> can be improved...:-)
Not very surprising. I committed them very recently. Feel free to do
what you believe is sensible with the text
Accepted:
archdetect_1.78_i386.udeb
to main/h/hw-detect/archdetect_1.78_i386.udeb
disk-detect_1.78_all.udeb
to main/h/hw-detect/disk-detect_1.78_all.udeb
driver-injection-disk-detect_1.78_all.udeb
to main/h/hw-detect/driver-injection-disk-detect_1.78_all.udeb
ethdetect_1.78_all.udeb
to m
> Attached the patches pending since I still can't push...
Applied and pushed (with a quite bad log message, apprently)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
(please keep crosspost)
Two new templates appeared recently in D-I, in the hw-detect
component.
They're related to the possibility of using "driver injection disks"
to allow using OEM drivers for some devices. This feature was imported
from Ubuntu.
I think that these tempaltes deserve a review,
On Wednesday 26 May 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> "this OS release": we never talk like this in other parts of D-I. If
> we want to avoid branding ("this release of Debian"), we could at
> least use "this release of the operating system").
My first question would be: do the disks actually work
On Wed, 26 May 2010 00:23:04 -0400 (EDT), Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 05/26/2010 03:36 AM, Stephen Powell wrote:
>> ...
>> That works for now; but if a package upgrade for extlinux is ever
>> downloaded, I'm afraid that new versions of the hook scripts will
>> be copied into these directories which
Christian PERRIER wrote:
> (please keep crosspost)
>
> Two new templates appeared recently in D-I, in the hw-detect
> component.
>
> They're related to the possibility of using "driver injection disks"
> to allow using OEM drivers for some devices. This feature was imported
> from Ubuntu.
>
> I
On 05/26/2010 10:45 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> That's the single feature I misseded. Thanks.
welcome.
> Although it would be even better if it was possible to include some
> fixed part in it, while keeping most of it auto updated. I tested the
> extlinux package after reading about it yesterday, a
Justin B Rye wrote:
> Extra problem: a media that contains? Media is a non-countable
> noun, so it takes singular agreement. Or to avoid making anybody
> worry about that, eliminate the need for agreement by saying:
Whoops, "contains" _is_ third-person singular. The thing that
sounds so odd abo
[Christian PERRIER]
> Any other comments?
I see there is some confusion about this feature. This new udeb
provide an automatic way to activate driver debs that are made
available as part of the hardware. The internal driver disk is part
of the hardware (think USB stick that is part of the BIOS
> for much. But I am opposed to the removal of lilo. Both grub-legacy and
> grub-pc use sectors on the hard disk outside of the master boot record
> (cylinder 0, head 0, sector 1). In other words they use cylinder 0, head 0,
> sector 2 and possibly subsequent sectors on cylinder 0 head 0.
Reall
Stefan Monnier, le Wed 26 May 2010 14:23:44 -0400, a écrit :
> > for much. But I am opposed to the removal of lilo. Both grub-legacy and
> > grub-pc use sectors on the hard disk outside of the master boot record
> > (cylinder 0, head 0, sector 1). In other words they use cylinder 0, head 0,
> >
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I see there is some confusion about this feature. This new udeb
> provide an automatic way to activate driver debs that are made
> available as part of the hardware. The internal driver disk is part
> of the hardware (think USB stick that is part of the BIOS or ILO/DR
On Thursday 27 May 2010, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Because the question is "where?". The lilo approach is "inside the
> filesystem", which can break. The grub approach is "right after MBR",
> which needs room there.
grub (legacy) can be installed in any partition. IIUC grub2 is limited to
being i
Frans Pop, le Thu 27 May 2010 01:32:17 +0200, a écrit :
> On Thursday 27 May 2010, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Because the question is "where?". The lilo approach is "inside the
> > filesystem", which can break. The grub approach is "right after MBR",
> > which needs room there.
>
> grub (legacy)
Paul Vojta, le Thu 27 May 2010 00:47:14 +, a écrit :
> In article ,
> Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> >
> >Sorry, I don't trust in the future of LILO myself. If there's anything
> >which only LILO can do, I recommend you start complaining on the
> >Syslinux and the Grub mailing lists. I suppose it w
>> > for much. But I am opposed to the removal of lilo.
>> > Both grub-legacy and grub-pc use sectors on the hard disk outside
>> > of the master boot record (cylinder 0, head 0, sector 1). In other
>> > words they use cylinder 0, head 0, sector 2 and possibly subsequent
>> > sectors on cylinder
21 matches
Mail list logo
