Le mercredi 27 janvier 2010 à 10:43 +0100, Frans Pop a écrit :
> On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Geek87 wrote:
> > I also would like to have it working similarly for the tasks: for
> > example if I have a task "Mail server" installed depending on Sendmail
> > and that the new version of this task now
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Geek87 wrote:
> Thanks! So it's impossible to have it work with tasksel. And for the
> base system? Does someone have an idea?
That's a question that's probably better asked on the debian-user list.
Cheers,
FJP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 03:39:46PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Josef Wolf wrote:
> > I am wondering what netcfg-static is good for. Looks like it is an
> > (outdated) subset of the more generic netcfg.
>
> No. It's used for s390:
> installer/build/pkg-lists/netboot/s390
reassign 565639 linux-2.6 2.6.30-8
severity 565639 serious
affects 565639 debian-installer
On Sunday 24 January 2010, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Adding kernel team for comment: it looks like the value returned by
> uname -m has changed from 'sparc64' in kernel 2.6.26 to 'sparc' in
> 2.6.30 (and, probab
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 565639 linux-2.6 2.6.30-8
Bug #565639 [installation-reports] SunBlade 1000 installation report - boot
fails after installation
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug #565639 [linux-2.6] SunBlade 1000 insta
Hi,
I'm a linux hardware test engineer and I'm also testing Debian on new
hardware from time to time. Actually I'm trying to figure out a strange
problem:
I have a system that sleeps of when I'm installing Debian/Lenny 32bit.
The installation is done by booting the netboot kernel & initrd.gz from
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 373253 by 567182
Bug #373253 [debian-installer] "libgcc_s.so.1 on AMD64 and PowerPC should be
provided
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 373253: 567182
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Rainer Koenig wrote:
> Would be nice to figure out the "why" behind this problem. My guess at
> the moment is that it is related to
> a) the CPU which is a new AMD dual core athlon
> b) the 2.6.26-2-486 kernel that is used during the installation
>
> So I think there is
On 27.01.2010 23:26, Frans Pop wrote:
Thanks a lot for the quick reply.
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
The patch itself looks ok, some other questions:
- did you consider building the udeb from a separate source package,
build-depending on gcc-4.4-source?
No, I h
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 27.01.2010 23:26, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >>- did you consider building the udeb from a separate source
> >> package, build-depending on gcc-4.4-source?
> >
> > No, I had not consider
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Since 2 or 3 days, I'm having build failures on my local daily build
> for i386.
The IA64 buildd has a similar error:
mkfs.msdos -i deb1 -n "Debian Inst" -C ./tmp/cdrom/boot.img 32768
mkfs.msdos 3.0.8 (23 Jan 2010)
mmd -i./tmp/cdrom/boot.
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 28 January 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Since 2 or 3 days, I'm having build failures on my local daily build
> > for i386.
>
> The IA64 buildd has a similar error:
> mkfs.msdos -i deb1 -n "Debian Inst" -C ./tmp/cdrom/boot.img 327
Hello,
The images using last uploaded debian-installer are available for
testing[1]; If all looks fine I'd like to call it "a release".
1. http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_test1/
I'd like to ask people to run tests using those so we can decide about
releasing it or fixing any major i
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 13:53 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The images using last uploaded debian-installer are available for
> testing[1]; If all looks fine I'd like to call it "a release".
>
> 1. http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_test1/
>
> I'd like to ask people to run t
Hello Ian,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 13:53 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The images using last uploaded debian-installer are available for
>> testing[1]; If all looks fine I'd like to call it "a release".
>>
>> 1. http://cdimage.d
Hi,
I tested the Debian Sid Installer from January 25th.
It's close to perfection, it is really good and usable.
Here are the critical points I am missing:
1. At the end of the first gothrough you are asked whether you want UTC
or local time. Knowing that UTC is the standard switch I always chos
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Josef Wolf wrote:
> This can not be replaced by the generic netcfg with netcfg/use_dhcp set
> to "false" or netcfg/disable_dhcp set to "true"?
In theory that could maybe be done (but see below). Also note that setting
an arch-dependent default while still fully suppor
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 14:35 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello Ian,
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 13:53 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > I'd like to test the xen guest install functionality and this is only
> > present on the amd64+i386+pow
Frans Pop wrote:
> P.S. It really would be great if you could do such basic and simple checks
> yourself next time instead of always leaving it to others to solve
> problems.
From 7:51 am timestamp, I assume Christian needed to get to work and
didn't have time.
Anyway, the message has value as
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> The aptitude log for my i386 chroot had:
> [UPGRADE] dosfstools 3.0.7-1 -> 3.0.8-1
>
> Downgrading that solved it. I'll file a BR.
Confirmed on my side.
>
> Cheers,
> FJP
>
> P.S. It really would be great if you could do such basic and simple checks
>
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Joey Hess wrote:
> From 7:51 am timestamp, I assume Christian needed to get to work and
> didn't have time.
It also said "for the last few days".
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm
Otavio Salvador, le Thu 28 Jan 2010 13:53:26 -0200, a écrit :
> The images using last uploaded debian-installer are available for
> testing[1]; If all looks fine I'd like to call it "a release".
>
> 1. http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_test1/
Braille seems to be working. As this doesn'
Frans Pop schrieb:
> The first thing I would suggest to do is try if the Squeeze installer [1]
> (which currently uses a 2.6.30 kernel) still has the same problem.
Tried this out and yes, it works with Squeeze 32bit installer from
todays snapshot.
> You're in luck as the 686 kernel is already av
On Thursday 28 January 2010, you wrote:
> a) can I build a 32bit install image on a Debian amd64 system?
Only if you create an i386 chroot (using debootstrap).
> b) is there a bit of documentation for those things? Websites, books
> or whatever. Wouldn't mind reading some stuff to get deeper into
Hello Christian,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> Well, as I said earlier, the time I'm giving to D-I these days is
> limitedvery limited. I happen to still have daily builds running
> on my machine and was thinking that repo
Hello,
I've updated my patch to follow suggestions from F. Pop, and tested
it at my level. Perhaps some enhancements could be added for a better
usability.
If you call the Debian Installer with default debconf level, it
automatically scans all devices and select the first detected ISO
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 08:58:41PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 28 January 2010, you wrote:
> > b) is there a bit of documentation for those things? Websites, books
> > or whatever. Wouldn't mind reading some stuff to get deeper into this.
>
> http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/doc/internals/
Just tested again with the current network installer. MBR is still
destroyed.
How to reproduce:
- say no to "want to install in mbr" question
- leave field empty when asked where to install grub
(this time i entered "doesnotexist" but mbr was destroyed anyway)
- continue without bootloader
- fin
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 09:35:47PM +0100, Josef Wolf wrote:
> AFAICS, getting vlan support into the installer needs to be done in three
> steps:
>
> 1. Get 8021q kernel module into installer environment.
>
> 2. Install vlan package into installer environment. Only the vconfig
>binary (9kb) is
I tested it today with the sid-di daily PowerPC buisnesscard dated
"Thu Jan 28 22:35:10 UTC 2010"
It still segfaults at startup.
Sadly, I don't have the chops to fix this myself. If someone else
doesn't step up, PowerPC will not be working when Squeeze releases.
I can test anything you want
I tested it today with the sid-di daily PowerPC buisnesscard dated
"Thu Jan 28 22:35:10 UTC 2010"
It still segfaults at startup.
Sadly, I don't have the chops to fix this myself. If someone else
doesn't step up, PowerPC will not be working when Squeeze releases.
I can test anything you want
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 1/28/2010
Machine: Custom AMD64
Processor: Athlon64 3500
Memory: 2GB
Partitions:
FilesystemType 1K-blocks
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello,
The images using last uploaded debian-installer are available for
testing[1]; If all looks fine I'd like to call it "a release".
1. http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_test1/
I'd like to ask people to run tests using those so we can decide about
releasing
33 matches
Mail list logo
