Package: bdf2psf
Version: 1.44
Severity: important
In the BDF font format, each glyph's shape is defined in terms of a
bitmap of certain dimensions, located at a certain offset from the
origin. For example, in a font that uses a 12x24 pixel character cell,
the apostrophe glyph (') might only c
* Gaudenz Steinlin [2009-07-26 20:35]:
> I agree about the name change. We want to use the same name the
> Debian kernel package will use for the architecture. I propose to name
> it s3c24xx, are you fine with that name?
I guess either s3c24xx or (possibly) s3c should work. Vince knows a
lot abo
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 06:37:52AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Package: netbase
> Version: 4.36
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> Justification: fails to install
> User: initscripts-ng-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: incorrect-dependency
>
> Hi Marco,
>
> in 4.33 you demoted ifupdow
Hi,
I have a need to prompt user for input during the installation using d-i. I
have done quite a bit of searching but I don't seem to find the right words
to actually find a solution. I came across this thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2008/09/msg01078.html Which suggest I
would need t
On Tue, July 28, 2009 19:29, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> usbutils 0.82-1 is blocked from migration into testing to an udeb.
> It has been in unstable for more than 70 days without problems!
> Could you please hint it?
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...
On Tue, July 28, 2009 19:28, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> cpuburn 0.82-1 is blocked from migration into testing to an udeb.
> It has been in unstable for more than 70 days without problems!
> Could you please hint it?
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
> tags 487908 pending
Bug #487908 [debootstrap] debootstrap: can't --include packages involving
non-required Pre-Depends
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping p
On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Samuli Järvinen wrote:
> What would be the best place to look for examples to create this kind
> of simple dialog from the script run as late_command?
Both links below contain examples of what you're looking for. It's not
quite trivial though.
http://hands.com/d-i/
htt
Hi all,
We haven't had a properly installable stable release for a full month
now, #536312. Applies to both CD/DVD and network installs. I don't see
much activity to resolve this. Are we so busy with squeeze and sid, that
we don't care about lenny any more?
Best regards,
Anne Bezemer
P.S. Ju
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> On Tuesday 28 July 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > What about something like:
> >
> > Description: Standard (non-graphical) system
> > This task installs a reasonably small character-mode system,
> > that provides the most commonly used tools in non-gra
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
> That bug didn't progress that much since it was reported.
>
> My main concern about it is that it would probably open the gates for
> too many similar requests for "please-add-my-pet-server" tasks.
>
> I'd very much appreciate to have more input a
* Frans Pop [2009-05-25 23:05]:
> I disagree. The function of hw-detect, and in this case more
> particular disk-detect, is to ensure any hardware needed for
> partitioning gets made available. IMO this fits that definition
> perfectly.
>
> > How about I simply include the udeb in the netboot ini
On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> An interesting proposal that Colin made was to converge towards a task
> named "Login server" or something similar, that would include
> openssh-server, along with other packages such as denyhosts (or
> sshguard), rssh (Restricted shell allowing
On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> My understanding of your point is that having this:
>
> [ ] Desktop environment
> [ ] Foo
> [ ] Bar
> [ ] Standard (non-graphical) environment
>
> does not make it clear that standard+desktop will end up in a GUI.
Correct.
> If we go b
Back in 2007 I sent some emails to this list about preseeding with
complex partitioning schemes (lvm on raid, lvm on encrypted raid, etc).
I don't know how much this has improved since then, but having chatted
to a -boot member at debconf, he suggested this could still be useful.
The original mail
Christian Perrier writes:
> My understanding of your point is that having this:
>
> [ ] Desktop environment
> [ ] Foo
> [ ] Bar
> [ ] Standard (non-graphical) environment
>
> does not make it clear that standard+desktop will end up in a GUI.
>
> If we go back to "Standard environment", I
Quoting Martin Bagge (brot...@bsnet.se):
>
> package: cdebconf
> severity: wishlist
> tags: patch l10n
>
> Please consider to add this file to translation of debconf.
cdebconf messages are handled along with D-I translations. Indeed, the
D-I Swedish translation already includes the complete tran
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Frans Pop wrote:
> Most systems really only want ssh, not any of the rest. The real problem
> with ssh server is that almost everybody wants it, but we only want it
> installed deliberately because of the open port. Probably a separate task
> for it is the o
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Frans Pop wrote:
> I guess changing it to "Graphical desktop environment" would be OK, but
> that does not make "Standard (non-graphical) environment" any less wrong!
I think it would make clear that it is indeed a graphical system and
it makes sense for me
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:16:34 +0200
with message-id <4a7059c2.8040...@bsnet.se>
and subject line Re: Bug#539074: [INTL:sv] Swedish strings for cdebconf debconf
has caused the Debian Bug report #539074,
regarding [INTL:sv] Swedish strings for cdebconf debconf
to be marked as done.
T
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> > does not make it clear that standard+desktop will end up in a GUI.
>
> Correct.
>
> > If we go back to "Standard environment", I guess it does not make
> > things clearer enough.
>
> The current short description is "Standard *system*", not "Standa
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Most systems really only want ssh, not any of the rest. The real problem
> > with ssh server is that almost everybody wants it, but we only want it
> > installed deliberately becau
Hello, Otavio.
Please consider applying this patch to Debian parted.
Feel free to change variable name.
I tested this on GNU/kFreeBSD with success.
This could affect GNU/Linux (but it shouldn't).
Cheers,
Luca Favatella
From 50216d2c337a4e02649479058978ff0010d68583 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From
CCing anibal as he is going to take care of the openmoko kernel.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:48:15AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Gaudenz Steinlin [2009-07-26 20:35]:
> > I agree about the name change. We want to use the same name the
> > Debian kernel package will use for the architecture.
On Tuesday 28 July 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> There will be a second kernel BoF/meeting tomorrow (29th July) at
> 16:00-18:00 local time (14:00-16:00 UTC).
>
> I would like to discuss a possible lenny-and-1/2 kernel release. There
> should be time to discuss several other issues.
Are there logs
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:08:11PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 July 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > There will be a second kernel BoF/meeting tomorrow (29th July) at
> > 16:00-18:00 local time (14:00-16:00 UTC).
> >
> > I would like to discuss a possible lenny-and-1/2 kernel release. Th
On Wednesday 29 July 2009, maximilian attems wrote:
> > Are there logs of the two meetings?
>
> well the second meeting got shortcut by recent events,
> first meeting yes:
> http://charm.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/%23debian-kernel.2009-07-25.log
Thx.
Just for the record, the following is NOT corre
On Wednesday 29 July 2009, you wrote:
> > Just for the record, the following is NOT correct:
> > 10:09 otavio: only linux-modules-extra
> > 10:09 nothing d-i uses and nothing one should really have to
> > care.
> >
> > D-I uses the loop-aes modules (for encrypted partitioning) and that
> > is exa
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:50:58PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 July 2009, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > Are there logs of the two meetings?
> >
> > well the second meeting got shortcut by recent events,
> > first meeting yes:
> > http://charm.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/%23debian-kerne
On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 July 2009, you wrote:
> > > Just for the record, the following is NOT correct:
> > > 10:09 otavio: only linux-modules-extra
> > > 10:09 nothing d-i uses and nothing one should really have to
> > > care.
> > >
> > > D-I uses the loop-ae
Maks,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:51:04PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> even more if it is loop-aes which show a long history of
> hostily of the module owner versus linux-2.6 upstream.
That's not true.
There are several reasons why loop-AES has not been merged
upstream, and has very little
Package: debian-installer
Version: squeeze
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Tags: partman,luks,cryptsetup,encrypted
The bug does not occur on the system where bugreport is installed,because
this bug prevent me from installing debian
When i try to install debian squeeze on u
severity 539228 important
thanks
Hello,
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:43:04AM +0200, da jedall wrote:
> When i try to install debian squeeze on usb key (netinstall)
> and when i try to create installation over encrypted fs in partman,partman
> reload and freeze at 52% of loading.
> The installation
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 539228 important
Bug #539228 [debian-installer] partman freezes with encrypted partitions
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
flash-kernel_2.22_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
flash-kernel_2.22.dsc
flash-kernel_2.22.tar.gz
flash-kernel_2.22_armel.deb
flash-kernel-installer_2.22_armel.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot
Accepted:
flash-kernel-installer_2.22_armel.udeb
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel-installer_2.22_armel.udeb
flash-kernel_2.22.dsc
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.22.dsc
flash-kernel_2.22.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.22.tar.gz
flash-kernel_2.22_armel.de
36 matches
Mail list logo
