On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> In general followup to this and mostly because I think we don't need a
> flamewar here, I've amended the meeting report to:
>
> ==
> A proposal was made to upload the installation guide more often, which
> O
On Mon Apr 06 08:55, Frans Pop wrote:
> > This is a heads up mail for the D-I team.
>
> I'm not sure where the original mail comes from, but IMO this should be
> discussed on d-devel, especially since it impacts more than just D-I. I
> suspect there are quite a few packages that make some sort o
Ping.
RAID 1 array exists.
RAID 1 array is partitionable.
RAID 1 array has had an ext3 fs on it >2 years.
Partman sees RAID 1 array.
Partman sees RAID 1 array partition.
Partman does not see any filesystem.
Debian not installable unless I delete data?
The only solution is to erase half the arr
Matthew Johnson writes:
> On Mon Apr 06 08:55, Frans Pop wrote:
>> > This is a heads up mail for the D-I team.
>>
>> I'm not sure where the original mail comes from, but IMO this should be
>> discussed on d-devel, especially since it impacts more than just D-I. I
>> suspect there are quite a f
On Mon Apr 06 11:07, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> So lets get grub2 working everywhere. :) A worthy goal.
>
Sure, but don't remove lilo until we're happy that grub2 does work
everywhere.
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop writes:
[...]
> This is not about "preferring my way", but about properly discussing
> changes with the current de facto maintainer and official RM instead of
> blundering blindly about and making random changes without any proven
> be
Frans Pop writes:
> On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
[...]
>> > I do not have time to manage the removal at this point, but it will
>> > be gone by June.
>
> Has the package already been offered for adoption? Preferably with an
> overview of its current (upstream) status and m
On Monday 06 April 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hey, let's make one thing clear OK; You're de facto the maintainer and
> the RM of the installer manual and I fully agree with that but please
> realise that the manual is part of Debian Installer project.
Sure, but that does not change anything.
Hi Frans,
On Montag, 6. April 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> [1] No, I'm not just talking here. There really is at least one aspect of
> doing uploads that is totally non-obvious, but something that you really
> *must* be aware of. And no, I'm not going to explain what it is in this
> thread.
that's hi
> On Montag, 6. April 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
>> [1] No, I'm not just talking here. There really is at least one aspect
>> of
>> doing uploads that is totally non-obvious, but something that you really
>> *must* be aware of. And no, I'm not going to explain what it is in this
>> thread.
>
> that's h
On Monday 06 April 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Montag, 6. April 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > [1] No, I'm not just talking here. There really is at least one
> > aspect of doing uploads that is totally non-obvious, but something
> > that you really *must* be aware of. And no, I'm not going to expl
Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting William Pitcock (neno...@dereferenced.org):
lilo is due for removal anyway due to being unmaintained upstream and
the widespread availability of alternatives.
I think that last part is debatable.
I do not have time t
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 06:42 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting William Pitcock (neno...@dereferenced.org):
> > lilo is due for removal anyway due to being unmaintained upstream and
> > the widespread availability of alternatives.
> >
> > I do not have time to manage the removal at this poin
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 10:44 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Frans Pop writes:
>
> > On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> > I do not have time to manage the removal at this point, but it will
> >> > be gone by June.
> >
> > Has the package already been offered for a
William Pitcock wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 17:26 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting William Pitcock (neno...@dereferenced.org):
lilo is due for removal anyway due to being unmaintained upstream and
the widespread ava
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 17:26 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> >> Quoting William Pitcock (neno...@dereferenced.org):
> >>> lilo is due for removal anyway due to being unmaintained upstream and
> >>> the widespread availabil
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 10:13:32AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> > And, I think this should be mentioned as a release goal (dropping
> > lilo). Either high priority if we have install paths depending on
> > lilo, or normal priority otherwise.
> I agree here too. I think these install paths could
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 17:40 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> William Pitcock wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 17:26 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> >> Frans Pop wrote:
> >>> On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting William Pitcock (neno...@dereferenced.org):
> >
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 08:53 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 10:13:32AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> > > And, I think this should be mentioned as a release goal (dropping
> > > lilo). Either high priority if we have install paths depending on
> > > lilo, or normal priority
debian-installer_20070308etch4_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer_20070308etch4_ia64.deb
debian-installer-images_20070308etch4_ia64.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.d
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> I'm not sure where the original mail comes from, but IMO this should be
From lilo package BTS which I was tracking for l10n purposes. So I
just happened to notice William's answer to a bug report and thought
it would be good for this to be discussed in pu
Mapping oldstable to oldstable-proposed-updates.
Accepted:
debian-installer-images_20070308etch4_ia64.tar.gz byhand
debian-installer_20070308etch4_ia64.deb
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20070308etch4_ia64.deb
Changes: debian-installer (20070308etch4) oldstable; urgency=low
.
win32-loader_0.6.11_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
win32-loader_0.6.11.dsc
win32-loader_0.6.11.tar.gz
win32-loader_0.6.11_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
Accepted:
win32-loader_0.6.11.dsc
to pool/main/w/win32-loader/win32-loader_0.6.11.dsc
win32-loader_0.6.11.tar.gz
to pool/main/w/win32-loader/win32-loader_0.6.11.tar.gz
win32-loader_0.6.11_all.deb
to pool/main/w/win32-loader/win32-loader_0.6.11_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
win
Your message dated Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:17:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#520999: fixed in win32-loader 0.6.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #520999,
regarding [INTL:kk] Kazakh debconf templates translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:17:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#517174: fixed in win32-loader 0.6.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #517174,
regarding win32-loader: FTBFS: error: exdll.h: No such file or directory
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:17:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#522653: fixed in win32-loader 0.6.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #522653,
regarding win32-loader: [INTL:ru] Russian program translation update
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
This one time, at band camp, William Pitcock said:
> The only way it is feasible to do so is to drop all of the Debian
> patches. Without this, upstream is not cooperative with us.
Why is this?
--
-
| ,''`.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05-04-2009 23:20, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 06 April 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
[...]
>> As you can see on the meeting minutes nobody has objected to it...
>
> I think that's primarily because nobody had an opinion on it as so far
> nobody ha
Hi,
Can openssl 0.9.8g-16 be hinted to testing?
It fixes a security issue.
It has a udeb.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Monday 06 April 2009, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote:
> [...] I'm unsure if he trust me enough to do an upload if
> needed (or if D-I Team also sees me as the backup guy for
> D-I Manual).
"trust" is the wrong word here.
Currently I would not like you to do a release without me being i
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: 5.00 NetInst
Date: April 6, 2009
Machine: VirtualBox VM running on Compaq Presario SR2038X on Windows Vista
Processor: AMD Athlon64 X2
Memory:356 MB allocated
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate
Your message dated Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:50:36 +0200
with message-id <200904070450.38699.elen...@planet.nl>
and subject line Re: Bug#522864: installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #522864,
regarding installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On Monday 06 April 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > (I don't do this that often either; grep in existing docs is your
> > friend.)
>
> Yes, it doesn't work very well in the installation guide, but it does
> in the release notes indeed.
Well, it works for me even for the manual :-)
> Here is an up
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Mon Apr 06 11:07, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > So lets get grub2 working everywhere. :) A worthy goal.
> Sure, but don't remove lilo until we're happy that grub2 does work
> everywhere.
And that we have something resembling acceptable, up-to-date
35 matches
Mail list logo
