-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Happy Lenny release, thanks everyone who have contributed for this
release :)
As release-note said, old arm architecture is completely replaced by
armel. Hereby I'll shutdown my old-arm d-i buildd and make this machine
retired.
Thanks,
- --
Ken
Package: installation-reports
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: Network boot using a TFTP server
Image version:
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/installer-powerpc/current/images/powerpc64/netboot/vmlinuz-chrp.initrd
** see
* Jeff F [2009-02-12 12:28]:
> I followed instructions to remove hotplug from interfaces and ensured
> auto eth0 is present, made sure the symlink was present, and reviewed
> fstab -- which ended up being changed to the below -- why I do not
> know, nor if it is remotely correct with the UUID it c
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 06:20:12PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> As release-note said, old arm architecture is completely replaced by
> armel. Hereby I'll shutdown my old-arm d-i buildd and make this machine
> retired.
Thanks for having taken care of it all along. :)
Cheers,
--
Jérémy Bobbio
Hi,
I am happy that the lenny is released,
but Why it tried connection, since I just install CD1, I have no connection
to internet, it took a long time to install because it tried to download I
don't know what.
I switched to terminal 2 (ctrl+alt+f2) I noticed http process is running ??
I hope t
Package: apt-setup
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
This patch makes it possible to preseed the security directory, so that it can
be something other than / (useful in combination with apt-setup/security_host).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'u
This also raises the question what to do about arm, i.e. whether we
can remove support for arm from the kernel, installer and other
packages. Riku and Aurelien initially agreed to remove it, but then
Riku pointed out that we may have to keep support around in sid if arm
wants to take part in lenny
Win32-loader does not support Atheros AR5007EG. It is present in list as
wifi0 but I can not connect with my router. I have been tried different
modes (WEP, WPA, no password) but it is not work.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Your message dated Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:07:38 +0100
with message-id <20090215160737.ga4...@deprecation.cyrius.com>
and subject line ARM/Netwinder no longer supported
has caused the Debian Bug report #274695,
regarding Detect serial console on ARM and show console= entry
to be marked as done.
This
* Riku Voipio [2008-08-23 00:05]:
> All *supported* arm/armel platforms use "msdos" for hard disks[1], and
> any modern arm system would too. So I suggest defaulting to msdos,
> and adding any exceptions if found.
Applied, thanks.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> This also raises the question what to do about arm, i.e. whether we
> can remove support for arm from the kernel, installer and other
> packages. Riku and Aurelien initially agreed to remove it, but then
> Riku pointed out that we may have to keep support around in sid if
* Luk Claes [2009-02-15 17:24]:
> Why would we want to add support for new arm hardware if not for new
> installations?
Not new hardware, but a new kernel may have performance enhancements
that may be of interest to existing arm users.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSC
On Sunday 15 February 2009, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> As release-note said, old arm architecture is completely replaced by
> armel. Hereby I'll shutdown my old-arm d-i buildd and make this machine
> retired.
I've removed arm from the D-I project page and also from the daily builds
overview and testing
On Sunday 15 February 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> This also raises the question what to do about arm, i.e. whether we
> can remove support for arm from the kernel, installer and other
> packages. Riku and Aurelien initially agreed to remove it, but then
> Riku pointed out that we may have to k
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 05:28:02PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Now that we have the hands more free, I’d like to propose GTK+ 2.12.12
> for a lenny point release. We’ve received some requests to upgrade to
> this bugfix-only release, fixing a number of issues that you’re likely
> to hit with t
Philipp Kern writes:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 05:28:02PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Now that we have the hands more free, I’d like to propose GTK+ 2.12.12
>> for a lenny point release. We’ve received some requests to upgrade to
>> this bugfix-only release, fixing a number of issues that y
Frans Pop writes:
> On Sunday 15 February 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>> This also raises the question what to do about arm, i.e. whether we
>> can remove support for arm from the kernel, installer and other
>> packages. Riku and Aurelien initially agreed to remove it, but then
>> Riku pointed
Robert Millan writes:
> Package: apt-setup
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> This patch makes it possible to preseed the security directory, so that it can
> be something other than / (useful in combination with
> apt-setup/security_host).
I think it is a nice thing to be added however cou
On Sunday 15 February 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Robert Millan writes:
> > This patch makes it possible to preseed the security directory, so
> > that it can be something other than / (useful in combination with
> > apt-setup/security_host).
>
> I think it is a nice thing to be added however c
Frans Pop writes:
> On Sunday 15 February 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Robert Millan writes:
>> > This patch makes it possible to preseed the security directory, so
>> > that it can be something other than / (useful in combination with
>> > apt-setup/security_host).
>>
>> I think it is a nice
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 15:36 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit :
> Philipp Kern writes:
> > Ok, please go ahead. Thanks for contacting us that early so that it
> > spends "plenty" of time in proposed-updates. We will see what d-i
> > testing with the new binaries will bring us.
>
> In this
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
This also raises the question what to do about arm, i.e. whether we
can remove support for arm from the kernel, installer and other
packages. Riku and Aurelien initially agreed to remove it, but then
Riku pointed out that we may have to keep support around in sid if arm
w
Hello,
Two weeks ago I ahd some time free and started to write a script to
build debian-installer using SVN sources.
The script itself is not yet (it still lacks debian-installer building)
but it already does a good job for rest of packages.
To allow people to take a look at it, and improve it i
On Sunday 15 February 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> The script itself is not yet (it still lacks debian-installer building)
> but it already does a good job for rest of packages.
Have you ever looked at scripts/buildscript?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 15:00 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit :
>> > * Broken graphical installer, until someone updates our GTK+
>> > DirectFB patches
>> <...>
>> > Is all of that OK with the release team?
>>
>> - From d-i POV this is a serious issu
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 15:36 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit :
>> Philipp Kern writes:
>> > Ok, please go ahead. Thanks for contacting us that early so that it
>> > spends "plenty" of time in proposed-updates. We will see what d-i
>> > testing with the new bina
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 17:05 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit :
> Your comment fears me even more since it does look that we can end up
> without directfb support for long time... I think you agree with me that
> Graphical Installer can't be droped from Debian without a lot of people
> being u
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 01:31:29PM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 05:07:57PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > * Much more significantly, though, newt is probably already displaying a
> > * window. In order to do a good enough job to be able to run a full-screen
> > * curses
Frans Pop writes:
> On Sunday 15 February 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> The script itself is not yet (it still lacks debian-installer building)
>> but it already does a good job for rest of packages.
>
> Have you ever looked at scripts/buildscript?
Yes but mine uses cowbuilder to do all the wo
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 01:28:33PM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 04:44:53PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Export a new cdebconf_newt_get_progress_info function so that
> > cdebconf-newt-terminal can reinitialise progress bars (since there's no
> > progress_info member in st
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 17:05 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit :
>> Your comment fears me even more since it does look that we can end up
>> without directfb support for long time... I think you agree with me that
>> Graphical Installer can't be droped from Debian w
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 05:05:35PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Josselin Mouette writes:
> > Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 15:00 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit :
> >> > * Broken graphical installer, until someone updates our GTK+
> >> > DirectFB patches
> >> <...>
> >> > Is all of
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Unless you can find someone who is committed to make GTK+ work on the
> DirectFB backend, I strongly recommend that the installer considers
> using X11 instead.
Can you do a size estimate for this? It would need in addition
- the
Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi,
> Can you do a size estimate for this? It would need in addition
> - the X server,
> - evdev input module and
> - a framebuffer video module.
>
> Anything else?
HAL and DBus to go with input-evdev, I guess?
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer -
cdebconf_0.139_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.139.dsc
cdebconf_0.139.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.139_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.139_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.139_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.139_i386.deb
cdebconf-udeb_0.139_i386.udeb
cdebconf-terminal_0.3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf-terminal_0.3.dsc
cdebconf-terminal_0.3.tar.gz
cdebconf-gtk-terminal_0.3_i386.udeb
cdebconf-newt-terminal_0.3_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 412168 di-utils
Bug#412168: debian-installer: Rescue mode: terminal 'bterm' doesn't play nice
with some apps in rescue shell
Bug reassigned from package `rescue' to `di-utils'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
reassign 412168 di-utils
thanks
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 07:44:20AM +0100, Alain Kalker wrote:
> After booting into rescue mode and starting a shell in my root
> partition from the menu, the grub shell and some other
> tools messed up my screen, probably because the terminal type 'bterm'
> wasn'
cdebconf-gtk-terminal_0.3_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf-terminal/cdebconf-gtk-terminal_0.3_i386.udeb
(new) cdebconf-newt-terminal_0.3_i386.udeb extra debian-installer
cdebconf newt plugin to provide a clean terminal
cdebconf plugin to run a program in a clean terminal environment, shutting
Accepted:
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.139_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.139_i386.udeb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.139_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.139_i386.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.139_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.139_all.udeb
cdebco
Dom, 2009-02-15 às 22:14 +0100, Bastian Blank escreveu:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Unless you can find someone who is committed to make GTK+ work on the
> > DirectFB backend, I strongly recommend that the installer considers
> > using X11 instead.
>
>
Hi,
I'm going to upload dmraid 1.0.0.rc15-1 in unstable.
Relevant changes for d-i:
- Build dmraid shared library for both standard and udeb packages. It will
likely be used in the future by udev.
- Create new packages, libdmraid-dev, libdmraid1.0.0.rc15,
libdmraid1.0.0.rc15-udeb respectively
- I
On Monday 16 February 2009, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> Relevant changes for d-i:
> - Build dmraid shared library for both standard and udeb packages. It
> will likely be used in the future by udev.
> - Create new packages, libdmraid-dev, libdmraid1.0.0.rc15,
> libdmraid1.0.0.rc15-udeb respectively
Bastian Blank writes:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Unless you can find someone who is committed to make GTK+ work on the
>> DirectFB backend, I strongly recommend that the installer considers
>> using X11 instead.
>
> Can you do a size estimate for this?
Luis Matos writes:
> Dom, 2009-02-15 às 22:14 +0100, Bastian Blank escreveu:
>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> > Unless you can find someone who is committed to make GTK+ work on the
>> > DirectFB backend, I strongly recommend that the installer considers
>>
Giuseppe Iuculano writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to upload dmraid 1.0.0.rc15-1 in unstable.
>
> Relevant changes for d-i:
>
> - Build dmraid shared library for both standard and udeb packages. It will
> likely be used in the future by udev.
> - Create new packages, libdmraid-dev, libdmraid1.0.0.rc15
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:04:10PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> >> > Unless you can find someone who is committed to make GTK+ work on the
> >> > DirectFB backend, I strongly recommend that the installer considers
> >> > usin
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 08:26:23PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 01:31:29PM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 05:07:57PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > * Much more significantly, though, newt is probably already displaying a
> > > * window. In order
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 08:31:47PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 01:28:33PM +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 04:44:53PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Export a new cdebconf_newt_get_progress_info function so that
> > > cdebconf-newt-terminal can reini
On Sunday 15 February 2009, Colin Watson wrote:
> Author: cjwatson
> Date: Sun Feb 15 22:10:48 2009
> New Revision: 57572
>
> Log:
> Add cdebconf-newt-terminal to most images that include
> cdebconf-newt-udeb (although not floppies).
>
> Modified:
>trunk/installer/build/pkg-lists/cdrom-apus/com
On Monday 16 February 2009, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> I meant being called during a "progress", yes. I am unsure on how the
> plugin will react… but we'll figure out once you will have made
> progress on re-adding support for manual package selection. :)
It does not really need to be re-added, it's
On Monday 16 February 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 16 February 2009, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > I meant being called during a "progress", yes. I am unsure on how
> > the plugin will react… but we'll figure out once you will have made
> > progress on re-adding support for manual package selecti
Quoting Colin Watson (cjwat...@alioth.debian.org):
> _Description: Executing a shell
> After this message, you will be given a shell in the installer environment.
> - Since the installer could not find any partitions, no file systems have
> - been mounted for you.
> + No file systems have been
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
> Hello,
>
> Two weeks ago I ahd some time free and started to write a script to
> build debian-installer using SVN sources.
>
> The script itself is not yet (it still lacks debian-installer building)
> but it already does a good job for rest of packag
54 matches
Mail list logo
