On Sunday 15 February 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > This also raises the question what to do about arm, i.e. whether we > can remove support for arm from the kernel, installer and other > packages. Riku and Aurelien initially agreed to remove it, but then > Riku pointed out that we may have to keep support around in sid if arm > wants to take part in lenny+half. > > I think it makes sense to support arm for lenny+half in terms of the > kernel upgrade, but not for the installer (since we don't want any new > installations of arm anyway).
As we used the *Lenny* installer for Etch-n-half, supporting new installs for Lenny-n-half would not be possible anyway (assuming we'd use the same setup, and I currently don't see any reason why not) as it will just be impossible to build the installer for arm in Squeeze. I suggest completely removing any trace of arm from D-I SVN.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.