* Christian Perrier [2009-01-10 07:01]:
> arcboot-installer still needed (Martin)
done.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
arcboot-installer_1.11lenny1_mips.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
arcboot-installer_1.11lenny1.dsc
arcboot-installer_1.11lenny1.tar.gz
arcboot-installer_1.11lenny1_mips.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bo
Accepted:
arcboot-installer_1.11lenny1.dsc
to pool/main/a/arcboot-installer/arcboot-installer_1.11lenny1.dsc
arcboot-installer_1.11lenny1.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/arcboot-installer/arcboot-installer_1.11lenny1.tar.gz
arcboot-installer_1.11lenny1_mips.udeb
to pool/main/a/arcboot-installer/arcboo
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:15:07 +0100
with message-id <20090110091507.gh24...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#511308: installation-reports: Lenny 2009-01-08 netboot
on vmware
has caused the Debian Bug report #511308,
regarding installation-reports: Lenny 2009-01-
Christian Perrier writes:
> Quoting Ferenc Wagner (wf...@niif.hu):
>
>> I have no base to decide which is better, but there isn't too much
>> difference; I can't consider either one wrong.
>>
>> The following patch contains an unnecessary change as well: lcreate
>> can use up all remaining space
Not sure if I got the right package that causes this problem, hence the
partman? question in subject.
I have just seen this bug #307470 for partitioner. It seems similar in
configuration and symptom to what I currently experience, and may be related
or duplicate issue.
However this old bug is fr
Christian Perrier writes:
> Quoting Ferenc Wagner (wf...@niif.hu):
>
>> I have no base to decide which is better, but there isn't too much
>> difference; I can't consider either one wrong.
>>
>> The following patch contains an unnecessary change as well: lcreate
>> can use up all remaining space
Christian Perrier writes:
> Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
>
>> It would have been nice to have a bit more time to comment on such a
>> substantial patch, but well.
>>
>> I would strongly suggest to at least not actually _show_ ext4 as an option
>> as long as not all blockers are fixed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dann frazier writes:
> hey,
> I wanted to give -release & -boot a heads up that the kernel team is
> looking to do a linux-2.6 upload to sid tomorrow. As discussed on the
> d-i channel, delays in the d-i release have given us a short window to
> int
Hi,
Just trying to get an idea of the general feeling towards something
that bugs me right now: the maximum number of kernel arguments (32) is
just a tad too small for preseeding a full install (about 40 would be
enough). This form of preseeding may not seem too important at first,
but this is th
"Leif W" writes:
> Currently, mdadm, fdisk and cfdisk, ext2fs utils, and mount utils
> fully handle partitionable/partitioned raid arrays. I can handle
> this all with manual commands. But the install scripts do not allow
> any intervention or injection of manual commands in the partition
> pro
On Saturday 10 January 2009, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Just trying to get an idea of the general feeling towards something
> that bugs me right now: the maximum number of kernel arguments (32) is
> just a tad too small for preseeding a full install (about 40 would be
> enough). This form of preseedin
Hi,
I'm writing to the list to check about these issues, before submitting
bug reports about them.
1. The log has messages about missing libslang2-udeb package ( I used
the first i386 disk).
2. The log complains about using the obsolete debconf command TITLE.
Thanks.
--
Lior Kaplan
kap...@deb
On Saturday 10 January 2009, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> I'm writing to the list to check about these issues, before submitting
> bug reports about them.
>
> 1. The log has messages about missing libslang2-udeb package ( I used
> the first i386 disk).
>
> 2. The log complains about using the obsolete debc
Hello. This problem appears to be the result of a bug in QEMU that
have been fixed in the Subversion repository, as the following log
message indicates:
r5963 | aurel32 | 2008-12-10 16:02:16 +0100 (Wed, 10 Dec 2008) | 12 lines
target-i386: Fix jmp im on x86_64 when executing 32-bit code
partman-auto-lvm_31_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto-lvm_31.dsc
partman-auto-lvm_31.tar.gz
partman-auto-lvm_31_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
clone 510544 -1
severity -1 wishlist
retitle -1 Possible simplification of partition/LV size calculation
thanks
On Friday 09 January 2009, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> To the point: perform_recipe_by_lvm determines free space in binary
> kilobytes [kiB] by:
>
> free_size=$(vgs -o vg_free --units k --noh
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 510544 -1
Bug#510544: Installer/partition guide tried to use 500GB as swap
Bug 510544 cloned as bug 511442.
> severity -1 wishlist
Bug#511442: Installer/partition guide tried to use 500GB as swap
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'
>
On Saturday 10 January 2009, Håkon Stordahl wrote:
> Hello. This problem appears to be the result of a bug in QEMU that
> have been fixed in the Subversion repository, as the following log
> message indicates:
That is really good news. It would be great if that fix could make it into
Lenny, but I
Accepted:
partman-auto-lvm_31.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-lvm/partman-auto-lvm_31.dsc
partman-auto-lvm_31.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-lvm/partman-auto-lvm_31.tar.gz
partman-auto-lvm_31_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-lvm/partman-auto-lvm_31_all.udeb
Override entries for you
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:17:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#510544: fixed in partman-auto-lvm 31
has caused the Debian Bug report #510544,
regarding Installer/partition guide tried to use 500GB as swap
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
> "Leif W" writes:
>
> > Currently, mdadm, fdisk and cfdisk, ext2fs utils, and mount utils
> > fully handle partitionable/partitioned raid arrays. I can handle
> > this all with manual commands. But the install scripts do not allow
> > any intervention or injection of manual commands in the par
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: USB stick
Image version: Lenny RC1 amd64 netinst
(http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/lenny_di_rc1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso)
Date:
Machine: Athlon X2 5200+ desktop
Base System Installa
Frans Pop writes:
> On Friday 09 January 2009, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> The fix is to use kB units in calculating the free space:
>>
>> free_size=$(vgs -o vg_free --units K --noheading --nosuffix $VG_name |
>> sed -e 's/\..*//g'
>
> I have committed and uploaded this change.
Thanks. This helps
On Sunday 11 January 2009, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> I can accept this, but then this BR should not be closed, as the 1 TB
> limit (which hit the reporter) remains. People with big disks can
> still get huge swaps, as no LV can suck up more than 1 TB.
>
> Sorry if I didn't manage to make that clear p
Pyotr Berezhkov writes:
> rebooting into the installed system failed, as the initrd
> incorrectly identified the root device. As it turned out, the root
> device specified on Lilo's kernel command line (root=fd02 in my
> case) was incorrect.
It would be interesting to see /proc/devices in the i
Frans Pop writes:
> On Sunday 11 January 2009, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>> I can accept this, but then this BR should not be closed, as the 1 TB
>> limit (which hit the reporter) remains. People with big disks can
>> still get huge swaps, as no LV can suck up more than 1 TB.
>>
>> Sorry if I didn't
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.38
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: U-Boot
Image version: installer-armel/current/images/orion5x/netboot/qnap/ts-209/
2008-10-29
Date: 2009-01-09
Machine: QNAP TS-209 II
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 510544
Bug#510544: Installer/partition guide tried to use 500GB as swap
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
reopen 510544
thanks
On Sunday 11 January 2009, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Of course you may have solved it independently of my musings.
No, I based the patch I committed on the first part of your analysis.
> Changing k -> K in free size computations as I suggested fixes swap
> size with a 100 GB di
On Sunday 11 January 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > short: the maximal size of the unlimited partition is specified as
> > 1,000,000,000 in the recipes, and the numbers there mean MBs, so
> > that's 1000 TB.
>
> OK, but IMO this is more a structural flaw in partman-auto's recipe
> specification than a
31 matches
Mail list logo
