Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/jigdo-cd/debian-testing-i386-CD-1.template
Date: 19 May 2007
Machine: Dell Dimension XPS T450
Processor: PIII 450MHz
Memory: 512MB
Partitions: N/A
Output of lspci -nn and lspci -vn
On Friday 18 May 2007 12:45, Viktor Matys wrote:
> I used DVD iso builded by jigdo. The last two isos (may 14 and 10)
> don't work, but previous (april 30) worked well.
>
> I tested the last iso (jigdo may 14) also on another computer based on
> VIA, and result was the same - Cannot recognize hard
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 12:46:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425121: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
retitle 425121 d-i: format from the command line
tags 425121 moreinfo
thanks
Op 19-05-2007 om 02:57 schreef Brian Dockter:
> Image version:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/jigdo-cd/debian-testing-i386-CD-1.template
> Date: 19 May 2007
>
> Output of lspci -nn and lspci -vnn
Hello,
The web page at
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Today
assumes insider information about the date of past issues.
It is probably out of convience of moving a "current issue"
to the "past issue" section, without updating the date.
But that is wrong, at least lazy.
Example:
- May 19
On Saturday 19 May 2007 14:33, Geert Stappers wrote:
> It is probably out of convience of moving a "current issue"
> to the "past issue" section, without updating the date.
> But that is wrong, at least lazy.
No, it is not wrong. The overview of past issues is historic and really
only for informa
Joey Hess wrote:
> gnome-desktop:
[...]
>
> Well, this is entirely too much cruft for me to try to analize, but
> --without-recommands uses 1698MB and --with-recommands uses 2047MB.
> Can the recommends possibly be worth a 17% size increase for the desktop
> install?
It seems like a lot
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i_manual/log/en.log
===
It is possible to u
* Martin Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-18 10:54]:
> I confirmed, of course, that the unit works under the native firmware.
> I changed the network configuration to correspond to my local subnet.
...
> Any ideas? I'm hoping it's simple . . . but I have no idea what else
> to try.
Simple qu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> tags 400966 pending
Bug#400966: tasksel-data: Please make web-server install PHP 5, not 4
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Ple
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 05:26:55PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Martin Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-18 10:54]:
> > I confirmed, of course, that the unit works under the native firmware.
> > I changed the network configuration to correspond to my local subnet.
> ...
> > Any ideas? I
* Martin Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-19 11:52]:
> But, back to Debian/NSLU2: no I did not specify a DNS. I flashed with
> a point-to-point connection to a laptop. My network is running off of
> a Netgear wireless/wired router and I specified a static IP and
> gateway. Afterwards, my in
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 05:26:55PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Martin Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-18 10:54]:
> > I confirmed, of course, that the unit works under the native firmware.
> > I changed the network configuration to correspond to my local subnet.
> ...
> > Any ideas? I
reassign 418590 preseed 1.28
thanks
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 23:08, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 4/10/07, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If that does not fix it, please try building up your preconfiguration
> > file line by line until you find what causes the segfault.
>
> The cause is:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 418590 preseed 1.28
Bug#418590: main-menu: Segfault during automatic install on AMD64
Bug reassigned from package `clock-setup' to `preseed'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> On Friday 18 May 2007 01:04, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> The partitioner does not allow using an entire RAID device such as
>> /dev/md0; it wants to partition the device. I want to use /dev/md0 as
>> an LVM container, so I don't want to create a partition; a partiti
kernel-wedge_2.36_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-wedge_2.36.dsc
kernel-wedge_2.36.tar.gz
kernel-wedge_2.36_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Accepted:
kernel-wedge_2.36.dsc
to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_2.36.dsc
kernel-wedge_2.36.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_2.36.tar.gz
kernel-wedge_2.36_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_2.36_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
kernel-wedge_2.
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > Hmmm. These look *very* similar to issues I've seen in the last few
> > months while hacking on debian-cd:
> >
> > * shortcomings in busybox gunzip (#402482)
>
> thanks ;)
>
> i suspected 'corrupted' indices (or, indicies n
19 matches
Mail list logo
