On 30/06/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also added a strace for a regular (no video=ofonly) session at the
> same place.
I looked at both dfb and strace logs and this could be bug #342053 :
have you tried booting with the textual frontend, adding "no-hardware"
to directfbr
On 03/07/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
does anyone has a
better candidate than webfs ()?
I think thttpd[1] has also cgi support, you might want to look at
that, too. It is a little bit bigger, but probably, as an udeb, it can
be smaller.
[1] http://packages.debian.org/unst
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 11:43:27PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> appropriate here than in other cases. Is there some concern about
> apt-listchanges not listing NEWS files for newly-installed packages?
IME, it only lists NEWS.Debian files on upgrades...
--
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of N
Accepted:
aboot-installer_0.0.22.dsc
to pool/main/a/aboot-installer/aboot-installer_0.0.22.dsc
aboot-installer_0.0.22.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/aboot-installer/aboot-installer_0.0.22.tar.gz
aboot-installer_0.0.22_alpha.udeb
to pool/main/a/aboot-installer/aboot-installer_0.0.22_alpha.udeb
Announc
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 03/07/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
does anyone has a
better candidate than webfs ()?
I think thttpd[1] has also cgi support, you might want to look at
that, too. It is a little bit bigger, but probably, as an udeb, it can
be smaller.
Good advic
Accepted:
quik-installer_0.0.14.dsc
to pool/main/q/quik-installer/quik-installer_0.0.14.dsc
quik-installer_0.0.14.tar.gz
to pool/main/q/quik-installer/quik-installer_0.0.14.tar.gz
quik-installer_0.0.14_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/q/quik-installer/quik-installer_0.0.14_powerpc.udeb
Announcing t
tag 321820 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 18:40:30 +0200
Source: quik-installer
Binary: quik-installer
Architecture: source
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 321820 + fixed
Bug#321820: /root and /boot on different partitions on the same disk are ok
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
Le vendredi 30 juin 2006 à 19:21 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> In the next days, the stable 1.2 branch of libcairo should be released.
This has just happened. It has been uploaded to unstable today.
> Sometime during summer, GTK+ 2.10 should be released, with integrated
> DirectFB support.
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 05:25:36PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Thursday 29 June 2006 20:18, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Please take care when editing the changelog:
> > - line length
> > - capitalization of sentences
> > - mark new release as UNRELEASED
> > - spaces around name within block quo
Hey Geert,
On Sunday 02 July 2006 22:07, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Done. Now you only need to find someone to build and upload...
> :-)
many thanks for building and uploading and even putting my name in
changed-by :-) That was a nice surprise!
regards,
Holger
pgpCQuvvlTfUo.pgp
Descri
-- Forwarded message --From: priti Patil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Jun 29, 2006 11:41 AM
Subject: Announcement for mr-IN translations for D-ITo: debian-boot@lists.debian.org, debian-i18n@lists.debian.org
Hi,It's my pleasure to announce that I am starting D-I translations for mr-IN la
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 12:04:24PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hey Geert,
>
> On Sunday 02 July 2006 22:07, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > Done. Now you only need to find someone to build and upload...
> > :-)
>
> many thanks for building and uploading and even putting my name in
> changed-by :-)
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 05:56:09PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> FYI:
>
> a `svn commit` gives also a "Killed by signal 15"
> but the commit made it into the subversion repository.
For your information, I got today:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/debian-installer/installer/doc/devel
$ svn diff -
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
We have just uploaded a new version of the program that caused this
problem. It should be available in daily built images tomorrow.
It would be great if you could give it a try.
For the record I have tested an install of d-i netboot i386 dated
2006-07-02
On 03/07/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> does anyone has a
>> better candidate than webfs ()?
>
> I think thttpd[1] has also cgi support, you might want to look at
> that, too. It is a little bit bigger, but probably, as an udeb, it can
> be smaller.
Good advice : i install
El mié, 28-06-2006 a las 15:39 +0200, Holger Levsen escribió:
> Hi,
>
> from reading 237603 the issue seems to be fixed, 237612 is merged and
> describes the same problem in the standard kernel, which I guess is also
> fixed.
>
> Carlos, can you confirm this? I'd like to close these bugs.
>
T
>
> It's my pleasure to announce that I am starting D-I translations for mr-IN
> language.
May I add that this is the Marathi language, spoken by 70-90 million
people in India, in the Maharashtra state, which capital is Mumbai (Bombay).
--
Package: installation-reports
Boot method:
Image version:
Date:
Machine:
Processor:
Memory:
Partitions:
Résultat de lspci et lspci -n :
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked:[Ok ]
Configure network
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 02:54:40PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Could you restart the installer
I can now confirm that the end_request IO errors concede with the
waiting period before the partitioning screen comes up. There also
lengthy delays while "Scanning disks" with the IO errors being logged
ag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 373594 partmen-base
Bug#373594: installation-report: daily snapshot on compaq armada m700
Warning: Unknown package 'partmen-base'
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partmen-base'.
> retitle 373594 parted_devices causes dela
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 373594 partman-base
Bug#373594: parted_devices causes delays when probing non-existing floppy device
Warning: Unknown package 'partmen-base'
Bug reassigned from package `part
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 373594 partman-base
Bug#373594: parted_devices causes delays when probing non-existing floppy device
Bug reassigned from package `partman-base' to `partman-base'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
base-installer_1.62_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_1.62.dsc
base-installer_1.62.tar.gz
base-installer_1.62_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
Accepted:
base-installer_1.62.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.62.dsc
base-installer_1.62.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.62.tar.gz
base-installer_1.62_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.62_i386.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-cha
Your message dated Mon, 3 Jul 2006 18:32:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376539: (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
> Comments/Problems:
> tout est OK
J'ai oublie d'ajouter a ma reponse standard de fermeture d'un rapport
d'installation:
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris la peine de nous signaler cette
installation reussie. J'espere, en prime, que la localisation
francaise etait satisfaisante (ie avec plus d'accents
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 10:03:25AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 11:43:27PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > appropriate here than in other cases. Is there some concern about
> > apt-listchanges not listing NEWS files for newly-installed packages?
>
> IME, it only lists
partman-base_90_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-base_90.dsc
partman-base_90.tar.gz
partman-base_90_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Hi,
Last week I ran a test (in VMware) using the image based on the 2.8.18
libs that Davide made available.
I noticed a few things that IMO need to be dealt with ASAP, especially now
that Joss is asking for the libs to be uploaded to unstable.
* Default font size is _way_ too big.
The language
linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_0.3_mipsel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_0.3.dsc
linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_0.3.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.16-2-r3k-kn02-di_0.3_mipsel.udeb
ipv6-modules-2.6.16-2-r3k-kn02-di_0.3_mipsel.udeb
reiserfs-modu
On Monday 03 July 2006 11:51, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 30 juin 2006 à 19:21 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> > In the next days, the stable 1.2 branch of libcairo should be
> > released.
>
> This has just happened. It has been uploaded to unstable today.
Hmm. I'm not totally happy
Accepted:
partman-base_90.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_90.dsc
partman-base_90.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_90.tar.gz
partman-base_90_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_90_i386.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Thank
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-r5k-cobalt-di_0.3_mipsel.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-r5k-cobalt-di_0.3_mipsel.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.3_mipsel.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-sb1-
Frans Pop wrote:
Hi,
Last week I ran a test (in VMware) using the image based on the 2.8.18
libs that Davide made available.
I noticed a few things that IMO need to be dealt with ASAP, especially now
that Joss is asking for the libs to be uploaded to unstable.
* Enter key no longer work
Accepted:
kbd-chooser_1.29.dsc
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_1.29.dsc
kbd-chooser_1.29.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_1.29.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_1.29_i386.udeb
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_1.29_i386.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closi
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 07:47:26AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > Current work around is to reboot into rEFIt and run gptsync, and
> > > then run d-i from CDROM, and then configure the bootloader.
> > >
> >
> > could you please give more details about this?
>
> # apt-get install refit (w
kbd-chooser_1.29_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kbd-chooser_1.29.dsc
kbd-chooser_1.29.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_1.29_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
- Forwarded message from Mike Emmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Mike Emmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 14:12:39 -0700
To: Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: directfb-dev
Subject: Re: [directfb-dev] FW: G-I - Test results for mini.iso based on 2.8.18
libs
The clip was expa
On Monday 03 July 2006 23:21, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Nothing wrong, that's the correct behaviour of GTK+ applications : in
> SVN rev 38009 i set reactivity to and and double
> clicks as pressure on "OK" button for the handler of SELECT questions
> only, while MULTISELECT (and SELECT question
Your message dated Mon, 03 Jul 2006 14:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376310: fixed in kbd-chooser 1.29
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 12:07:51AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 01 July 2006 23:27, David Härdeman wrote:
Cool idea, but perhaps partman-crypto could be modified to do the same,
and the dependencies from partman-crypto on partman-crypto-loop and
partman-crypto-dm could be dropped (and ann
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 04:30:39PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>d-i's dev todo says that arm/mips* still need changes for debian-cd
>but I think this has been done already. Maybe you can check what is
>being installed
>
>basically, no 2.4 kernel should be installed; only 2.6
>
>mips should have
* Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-03 23:05]:
> At the moment, the following arches all have 2.4 kernels and bits
> going onto the CDs:
...
> I can change that quite easily if people desire it. Where's the d-i
> TODO? I must have missed it...
I'm talking about
svn://svn.d-i.alioth.debi
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-r5k-cobalt-di_0.3_mipsel.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-r5k-cobalt-di_0.3_mipsel.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.3_mipsel.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.
Ferenc wrote:
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/svn/debian-installer/packages/partman/partman-lvm/parted_names/lvm
has rather strange content (linux-swap, no terminating NL). Is this
intentional?
As I said before, the file seems completely superflous (after looking at
the acting_filesystem functi
Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 03 July 2006 23:21, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Nothing wrong, that's the correct behaviour of GTK+ applications : in
SVN rev 38009 i set reactivity to and and double
clicks as pressure on "OK" button for the handler of SELECT questions
only, while MULTISELECT (and SE
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 03/07/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> does anyone has a
>> better candidate than webfs ()?
>
> I think thttpd[1] has also cgi support, you might want to look at
> that, too. It is a little bit bigger, but probably, as an udeb, it can
> be smaller.
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 12:26:17AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>* Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-03 23:05]:
>> At the moment, the following arches all have 2.4 kernels and bits
>> going onto the CDs:
>...
>> I can change that quite easily if people desire it. Where's the d-i
>> TODO
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 12:38:52AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>Hmmm. Things are more awkward than I expected on the debian-cd end;
>the base list of udebs to be installed onto the CDs is generated from
>the d-i Packages.gz files in the main archive. Once the archive is
>updated to not mention t
Accepted:
tasksel-data_2.50_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel-data_2.50_all.deb
tasksel_2.50.dsc
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.50.dsc
tasksel_2.50.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.50.tar.gz
tasksel_2.50_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.50_all.deb
Announcing to debian
tasksel_2.50_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tasksel_2.50.dsc
tasksel_2.50.tar.gz
tasksel_2.50_all.deb
tasksel-data_2.50_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
Your message dated Mon, 03 Jul 2006 18:02:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304845: fixed in tasksel 2.50
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.49
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I would like to suggest tasks icon infrastructure inclusion. It would
be useless for readline frontend, but would be good for the gtk
installer frontend, new gnome-tasksel (porting it to gtk+ 2 right now)
and probably others in the future.
T
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 10:08:49PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 03 July 2006 11:51, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Sometime during summer, GTK+ 2.10 should be released, with integrated
> > > DirectFB support.
> >
> > This has also happened.
>
> At one point you feel like you're waiting endle
On 04/07/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This evening i built a test tarball, similar to those i used to build
when developing the GTK frontend, to test the web frontend with thttpd
in a real d-i environement.
The results were encouraging, even if a lot of work has to be done ye
On 03/07/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 03 July 2006 11:51, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 30 juin 2006 à 19:21 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> > In the next days, the stable 1.2 branch of libcairo should be
> > released.
>
> This has just happened. It has been uplo
57 matches
Mail list logo
