>On Wednesday 17 May 2006 21:33, Xavier Oswald wrote:
>> I see that if I choose chinese or another asian language, I cannot
>> read/understand the language list, if I validate the language.
I guess you're running the iso built by Attilio a while back and based
on 2.9 libraries right?
Some languag
Hi all,
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:50:41PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 01:08:59PM -0500, Karl Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > May 8 01:59:22 debootstrap: dpkg-deb (subprocess): failed to exec tar: No
> > such file or directory
> > May 8 01:59:22 debootstrap: dpkg-deb: subproce
Sven Luther a écrit :
Some thoughts by someone else than me about this issue :
Those are not thoughts about this issue. Those are general impressions
with a null argumentational value.
So, Frans and other of the d-i team, please read them, and think a bit before
you get offended because i
Hi,
FJP: the mpt* drivers are already on place but they are differnet from
the drivers provided by LSI
linux-kernel-2.6.16.16 offers version 3.03.07 but it seems that those
drivers do not include support for some cards
I prepared a diff [0] of latest kernel.org and LSI drivers (3.02.68).
Gee
Hi Frans and Kenshi,
On Thu, 18 May 2006 07:42:57 +0200
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 18 May 2006 03:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Could you add me to commiter for translating D-I manual?
>
> I have added you to the project. You should have commit access sometime
> tomor
On 09:22 Thu 18 May , Davide Viti wrote:
>
> >On Wednesday 17 May 2006 21:33, Xavier Oswald wrote:
> >> I see that if I choose chinese or another asian language, I cannot
> >> read/understand the language list, if I validate the language.
>
> I guess you're running the iso built by Attilio a
Package: cdebconf-entropy
Version: 0.3
Severity: serious
> Automatic build of cdebconf-entropy_0.3 on test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by
> sbuild/powerpc 0.44
...
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/cdebconf-entropy-0.3'
> Compiling newt-plugin-entropy-text.c to newt-plugin-entropy-text.opic
cdebconf-entropy_0.4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf-entropy_0.4.dsc
cdebconf-entropy_0.4.tar.gz
cdebconf-newt-entropy_0.4_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Accepted:
cdebconf-entropy_0.4.dsc
to pool/main/c/cdebconf-entropy/cdebconf-entropy_0.4.dsc
cdebconf-entropy_0.4.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/cdebconf-entropy/cdebconf-entropy_0.4.tar.gz
cdebconf-newt-entropy_0.4_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf-entropy/cdebconf-newt-entropy_0.4_i386.udeb
Announci
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 367827 +pending
Bug#367827: FTBFS: conflicting types for 'question_get_variable'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 06:02:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367827: fixed in cdebconf-entropy 0.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: installation-guide
Version:
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n, patch
Typos etc. from the file using-d-i.po
__
using d-i typos etc.
1.
po:78
auto: ⑤ Tag: para
Original: ⌘0 During a low memory install, not all components will be
available. One of the limitations is
Colin, i believe this is your call, you are the yaboot expert.
Anyway, CCing debian-boot, as this is the right place to ask d-i questions,
not d-ppc.
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:28:02AM +0200, Christian Guggenberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am struggling with recent D-I daily builds to get CHRP machine
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:49:35PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:47:37PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:14:05AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > > You are the only one who chose this course of action, that resulted in
> > > wasting
> > > so
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 04:41:15PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:49:35PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:47:37PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:14:05AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You are the only one
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:42:44AM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 01:21:09AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > I'll be giving a workshop explaining the technical side of the installer
> > on Thursday 18-5 from 20:20 - 22:00 UTC (if my timezone calculations are
> > correct).
> >
>
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 04:49:05PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 04:41:15PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> >
> > My planned topics are:
> >
> > * add network preseeded static network configuration
> >
> > * add complete preseedable network console installs
> >
> > * rew
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:20:12PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> Imagine i upload a new nobootloader version, with some changes in it. I either
> upload it directly, without revision system, or with my own shadow copy of the
> d-i svn like above.
>
> Now, someone else needs to modify nobootloader
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 07:28:07PM +0200, Stefano Canepa wrote:
> > Stefano Canepa wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > the CD images with both graphical and textual installer will run
> > > graphical as default?
> > > At my LUG when we explain the installation process to new users we
> > > present Mand
Hi Installer Team
I am not completely sure about this issue, so I'll better ask here on the ML
before filling a bug.
During the debian-edu installation (keep in mind that we try to autoconfigure
everything) there comes this warning about the missing security mirror. Well
it is just a warning, b
I noticed it - turned out /proc was not created.
It is fixed in the version with dates of May 13, 06
(I renamed this iso to debian-testing-amd64-netinst-5-13-06.iso
Why not use such a naming system so people can see which build the iso was
based on? How valuable are install bug reports if ther
On Thursday 18 May 2006 19:47, Joey Hess wrote:
> Type: select
> Choices: ${mirrors}
> Default: ftp.debian.org
> -Default[amd64]: ftp.de.debian.org
Hmm. I wonder if this isn't premature as AMD64 is not yet installable from
testing on the official mirrors...
I'm not exactly sure what is still
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 05:42:16PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:20:12PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > Imagine i upload a new nobootloader version, with some changes in it. I
> > either
> > upload it directly, without revision system, or with my own shadow copy of
Hello all,
I try the entire day to install debian on my main server
I dowload the etch daily build (20060516) for ia64
I can boot but the system does not have the driver for the megaraid (see
my previous post for a detailled hardware configuration) and the
partition for installing debian is on a d
Karl Schmidt wrote:
I noticed it - turned out /proc was not created.
It is fixed in the version with dates of May 13, 06
I take that back - it is fixed if you chose a stable install, if you choose
testing it fails.
Karl Schmi
Frans Pop wrote:
> Hmm. I wonder if this isn't premature as AMD64 is not yet installable from
> testing on the official mirrors...
The unofficial port mirrors have already been dropped from
Mirrors.masterlist and are AFAIK not supported so it seems the right
time.
> I'm not exactly sure what is
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:20:12PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Imagine i upload a new nobootloader version, with some changes in it. I either
> upload it directly, without revision system, or with my own shadow copy of the
> d-i svn like above.
> Now, someone else needs to modify nobootloader. He
choose-mirror_2.01_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
choose-mirror_2.01.dsc
choose-mirror_2.01.tar.gz
choose-mirror_2.01_all.udeb
choose-mirror-bin_2.01_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
choose-mirror_2.01_i386.changes is already present on target host:
-rw-r--r-- 1 katie debadmin 2514 May 18 14:36 choose-mirror_2.01_i386.changes
Either you already uploaded it, or someone else came first.
Job choose-mirror_2.01_i386.changes removed.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
-
finish-install_2.0_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
finish-install_2.0.dsc
finish-install_2.0.tar.gz
finish-install_2.0_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
(new) finish-install_2.0.dsc required debian-installer
(new) finish-install_2.0.tar.gz required debian-installer
(new) finish-install_2.0_all.udeb required debian-installer
Finish the installation and reboot
Changes: finish-install (2.0) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Renamed the package, since "base
Accepted:
choose-mirror-bin_2.01_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror-bin_2.01_i386.udeb
choose-mirror_2.01.dsc
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_2.01.dsc
choose-mirror_2.01.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_2.01.tar.gz
choose-mirror_2.01_all.udeb
t
partman-base_83_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-base_83.dsc
partman-base_83.tar.gz
partman-base_83_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
On Thursday 18 May 2006 23:28, Steve Langasek wrote:
> If you are the maintainer of nobootloader, and you are not allowed to
> commit to the d-i svn repo, then it is appropriate to request that the
> d-i maintainers deprecate the svn repo for these packages.
Well, as far as Joey and I are concerne
I think people on the ia64 port list are probably in a better position to
help you with this, so I'm forwarding this mail there.
Cheers,
FJP
On Thursday 18 May 2006 22:14, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
> I try the entire day to install debian on my main server
> I dowload the etch daily build (20060516) f
Accepted:
partman-base_83.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_83.dsc
partman-base_83.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_83.tar.gz
partman-base_83_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_83_i386.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing
Just found out that it does not segfault when removing the square brakets
~ # echo test | tr '[a-z]' '[A-Z]'
Segmentation fault
~ # tr 'a-z' 'A-Z'
~ # echo test | tr 'a-z' 'A-Z'
TEST
regards,
Davide
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Today a new version of choose-mirror was uploaded that contains an updated
mirrorlist and also has the normal mirrors as default for AMD64 instead
of amd64.debian.net.
As AMD64 is not yet installable from testing, this may break network based
installations. Installations (in expert mode) of uns
Right now lvmcfg contains the option "Leave" in each menu which is
superflous as there is also the "Go Back" button. I assume that there is
a reason for the menu option (e.g. partconf support or something) as
it has been around for so long.
So, why is the "Leave" option there, and can I safely
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 01:21:30AM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
Right now lvmcfg contains the option "Leave" in each menu which is
superflous as there is also the "Go Back" button.
...
So, why is the "Leave" option there, and can I safely remove it in the
SVN repo?
And by removing it, bug #27
Hi,
as was pointed out during this bug report. The lvm configuration is
offered by lvmcfg. There doesn't seem to be any outstanding issues in
this bug report, so it should perhaps be closed?
Re,
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 16:02:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#270136: fixed in partman-base 83
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Fri, 19 May 2006 09:51:25 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#219667: Still relevant?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:55:02PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 01:14:25AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > Okay. I've had a preliminary play with ipconfig over the weekend. Seems
> > relatively straightforward to slot it into netcfg's dhcp.c. What I need to
>
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 10:43:01PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > Okay. I've had a preliminary play with ipconfig over the weekend. Seems
> > relatively straightforward to slot it into netcfg's dhcp.c. What I need to
> > understand is the necessity to set a vendor-class-identif
Hi there lovely,
I was searching the net few days ago. I am new to this thing.
and saw your profile. I decided to email you causea I found
you attractive. I might come down to your city in few weeks.
Let me know if we can meet each other in person.
I am attractive girl. I am sure you won't regret
Some bits of feedback about the g-i screenshots that were published on
the web recently:
- The installer looks far friendlier to newbies than the ncurses mode
did. Keep up the good work!
- The logo banner at the top seems somehow off-balance, but I'm not sure
how. What if we used the same fon
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 04:28:27PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:20:12PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Imagine i upload a new nobootloader version, with some changes in it. I
> > either
> > upload it directly, without revision system, or with my own shadow copy of
> >
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 01:02:20AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 18 May 2006 23:28, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > If you are the maintainer of nobootloader, and you are not allowed to
> > commit to the d-i svn repo, then it is appropriate to request that the
> > d-i maintainers deprecate the sv
On Friday 19 May 2006 06:10, Sven Luther wrote:
> Also, there is another thing to consider, i will need to do some
> nobootlaoder changes in the near future, before we can release the new
> version of the pegasos firmware, so that debian will not break on it
> (and since we ship those boxes with de
On Friday 19 May 2006 03:28, Jason Spiro wrote:
> - The installer looks far friendlier to newbies than the ncurses mode
> did. Keep up the good work!
Thanks.
> - The logo banner at the top seems somehow off-balance, but I'm not
> sure how. What if we used the same font for the words "GNU/Linux"
51 matches
Mail list logo
