On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 11:18:34AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #275006: pre-RC2 install report, SCSI disk not found,
> which was filed against the debian-installer package.
>
> It has been closed by one of the developers,
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 06:38:59AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Your log contains
> > debconf (developer): <-- SUBST apt-setup/country countries wprowad 1/4
> > informacj? r?cznie, Australia, Austria, Belgia, Bia?oru?, Brazylia...
> > The first item is the translation of "enter informati
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:54:02AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Horms wrote:
> > The new packages are available, look for the ones dated 29th
> > November.
>
> Thanks, new kernel-source-2.4.27 works fine on alpha.
Thanks for the feedback. I am going to go ahead and upload the
packages. Th
Package: discover1-data
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
In two installation reports, we see problems with common decchip cards
on hppa and discover1. In #282814, hw-detect has to prompt for the
ethernet driver to load since discover1 tells it to load de4x5, which is
not available in the d-i initrd.
Hi folks,
> I think that option will disable the dhcp, whether that
> fixes your kernel hang, which is likely due to busted hardware, or a
> kernel network driver bug, I don't know. Try it and let us know.
I tried the old Suse7.0 (2.2.16) which ist still on the harddisk and
produced some heavy loa
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a:
not available
Date: november 30
Method:
boot from cd
install from network (ftp.fr.debian.org)
enterprise proxy
Machine: P
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: rc2
uname -a: Linux andrewpollock 2.6.8-powerpc #1 Sun Oct 3 13:22:21 CEST 2004 ppc
GNU/Linux
Date: Wed Dec 1 21:15:24 EST 2004
Method: netinst CD
Machine: Apple PowerBook G4
Processor:
Memory:
Root Device:
Root Size/part
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> clone 282814 -1
Bug#282814: installation-reports: [hppa] hardware detection & partitioning
problems w/ 2.6
Bug 282814 cloned as bug 283784.
> reassign -1 kernel
Bug#283784: installat
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:19:15PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> - parted: Still frozen no matter what we do with d-i.
Why ? i can upload the experimental package to unstable, and it be used in
d-i, and if sarge fixes are needed upload them through t-p-u, no ?
I also believe that it was a mistake
Vincent McIntyre wrote:
this should be enough to run
(lspci; lspci -n) |sort >lspci.sb100.txt
and scp the resulting file to some other host.
The Gentoo LiveCD worked very well on the first try.
Here is the result of running the above command :
:00:00.0 Class 0600: 108e:a001
:00:00.0 Hos
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
I am doing a install of the jigdo DVD images for powerpc, using the 24.11.2004
jigdo images, which should use RC2.
Quik is still installed on my chrp/pegasos system, even though it should only
be installed on oldworld powerpc hardware.
It has been m
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:00:45AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > partman-auto is arch: all, actually, which makes the alpha recipe breakage
> > more annoying to fix no matter which way you slice it.
> Ok, still it seems fixable by removing recipes-alpha/multi_user
It may be
Due to the rc2 and upcoming final version of Debian Installer
I decided to test whether my old bug report #248855 has been
taken into account. Alas, it has not.
Today I tried two CD images, without success:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/sparc/20041130/sarge-sparc-businesscard.
forwarding for info.
283666 and 275627 should probably merge
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 12:32:02 +0100
From: Daniel Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Vincent McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#283666: Package: installation-report
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 11:40:37PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> BTW, i also believe that this is a problem on pegasos. Doing a
> ped_partition_set_system each time we put a filesystem on a partition may be
> the thing to do, do you do this ?
Yes.
> Example, on pegasos, i was going to install an
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:19:15PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> - Some problems with the CDs, I belive the amiga kernel is missing,
>there may be some other mising things.
> May or may not be fixed in debian-cd CVS. The amiga kernel fix
> was orignally commited to an automatically ge
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 04:20:17PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 11:40:37PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > BTW, i also believe that this is a problem on pegasos. Doing a
> > ped_partition_set_system each time we put a filesystem on a partition may be
> > the thing to do
I sent this to the bug where I found the issue mentioned, but that
didn't replicate the message to debian-boot. I'm sending here because
it's an issue more related to the installer.
-- Forwarded message --
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello
this issue (ide=nodma boot time option does n
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 02:25:02PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> Ah, no, it was a swap paritition previously, not an ext3.
Are you sure that it didn't contain ext3 signatures already? If it
contained swap but partman didn't update the partition type then this
must be some unknown bug. (Well, it
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 04:48:32PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 02:25:02PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > Ah, no, it was a swap paritition previously, not an ext3.
>
> Are you sure that it didn't contain ext3 signatures already? If it
> contained swap but partman didn
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/current/
from 2004-10-25
uname -a: Linux dhcp241 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:24:46 UTC 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-12-01 13:00 GMT+2
Method: How did you install?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 283510 Calling debootstrap with "--components=" causes ugly errors
Bug#283510: installation-reports
Changed Bug title.
> clone 283510 -1
Bug#283510: Calling debootstrap with "--components=" causes ugly errors
Bug 283510 cloned as bug 283810.
>
I propose the attached patch to base-installer's postinst to avoid this
error. I've used an existing general error message, so no string changes
are needed (after all, it is a fairly exceptional situation.
This patch has already been committed to TRUNK. Please review and upload.
I think this pat
retitle 283510 Calling debootstrap with "--components=" causes ugly errors
clone 283510 -1
reassign -1 debootstrap
severity -1 minor
reassign 283510 base-installer
tags 283510 + patch
thanks
Markus,
Your problems have nothing to do with your network setup, but probably
with intermittent errors w
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 07:38:50PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> When running an Arabic install, partman always hangs when reaching 50% in
> the partitions creation step (full disk used, only one partition...that is
> all default choices).
Is this bug still there?
Anton Zinoviev
--
To
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:07:54PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > 1. Partman may not write all partition tables - some of them may be for
> >example USB disk we are installing from
>
> So what ?
The following is a quote from
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/debian-boot-200402/msg01788
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 05:31:15PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:07:54PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > 1. Partman may not write all partition tables - some of them may be for
> > >example USB disk we are installing from
> >
> > So what ?
>
> The following is a q
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 283510 + pending
Bug#283510: Calling debootstrap with "--components=" causes ugly errors
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 248855 debian-installer
Bug#248855: Package: installation-reports (overall success on SunBlade 150,
with some problems)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `debian-installer'.
> severity 248855 important
Bug#248855: Package:
reassign 248855 debian-installer
severity 248855 important
thanks
Reassigning this BR to debian-installer to make it a bit more visible.
Joshua: IIRC you were looking at this problem, any progress?
On Wednesday 01 December 2004 14:01, Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
> Briefly: after booting the SunBl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(please keep both d-boot and d-i18n CC'ed for this discussion)
On Tuesday 30 November 2004 06:52, Christian Perrier wrote:
> In my opinion, that counts first for changes to the original version of
> the manual. However, as soon as some English is chan
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 282650 netcfg: incorrectly configs DNS/route when preseeded with
> static info
Bug#282650: netcfg: incorrectly configures DNS when preseeded with static
address
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
retitle 282650 netcfg: incorrectly configs DNS/route when preseeded with static
info
thanks
The default gateway also seems to get set incorrectly. In a separate test
I specified:
d-i netcfg/disable_dhcp boolean true
d-i netcfg/get_nameservers string 15.23.136.68
Hi,
> All other translations
> ==
> These are only shown on the d-i manual website. As these translations
> are build from trunk, I see no advantage in updating these
> translations in the Sarge branch, as there would be risks in including
> extra translations on the CD's in la
Tried again now. Same system. Same rc2. Using linux26
hangs in "Installing base packages". No logs.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: <29-nov-04 from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge-i
386-netinst.iso>
uname -a:
Date: <29-nov-04>
Method:
Machine:
Processor:PII-300 MMX
Memory: 160 MB
Root Device:
Root Size/partition table: <
D
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:36:14PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Or partition we are mounting without formating if its type doesn't
> > correspond to the file system it contains.
>
> Well, i don't think so, not automatically at least.
(Lib)parted repairs the wrong partition types in all cases
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:13:47PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:36:14PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > > Or partition we are mounting without formating if its type doesn't
> > > correspond to the file system it contains.
> >
> > Well, i don't think so, not automati
> For the English original
>
> I feel that for the time being most changes in trunk could safely go to
> the Sarge branch: there are plenty of improvements possible that are
> relevant for Sarge, including the planned reorganization of Chapter 2
> (which I plan to start
> Where does pl.po claim that?
> I'm pretty sure I set iso-8859-2 in every my translation.
In the header:
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\n"
I corrected this this morning in both branches. I did not put the
Closes line in the changelog because I haven't tested whether this
fixes
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 12:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Bug#275006: Bug fixed for me in linux26 netinst 20041130
>
>
> Just to confirm that netinst cd works now on my Dell 1400SC. I used
>
Your message dated Wed, 1 Dec 2004 18:06:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#266354: partman: Seems to "hang" while reaching 50% during
Arabic install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Wed, 1 Dec 2004 21:34:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #238358,
regarding While resizing an ext3 partition the progress bar was always at 0%
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(N
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: RC2, from ftp.debian.nl
uname -a: Linux serf 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:24:46 UTC 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-11-30, 23:00h
Method: Booted off CD, installed from ftp://mirror.switch.ch/mirror/debian/
, no proxy.
Machine: Desktop, IBM IBM-
Steve Langasek wrote:
> It may be fixable by editing recipes-alpha/multi_user into something usable,
> but removing it would just fall back on the arch-neutral recipe, which is
> broken in other ways.
>
> I'm happy to fix up the alpha-specific multi_user recipe, if people can
> provide input as to
Sven Luther wrote:
> Why ? i can upload the experimental package to unstable, and it be used in
> d-i, and if sarge fixes are needed upload them through t-p-u, no ?
I think the release managers will tell you this is not a good idea. See
kde's mounds of unfixed security holes in testing due to the
The patch below is in d-i's trunk, but not sarge branch, and adds 2.6
netboot images for hppa. I have tried both the new 2.6 images and 2.4
images and they work (well, 2.6 installs but fails to boot the installed
system on my a500, unrelated I think).
I'd like to commit this to the sarge branch,
tag 283377 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 14:09:07 -0500
Source: network-console
Binary: network-console-config network-con
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 07:21:04PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:13:47PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:36:14PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > > > Or partition we are mounting without formating if its type doesn't
> > > > correspond to the
Sven Luther wrote:
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: important
>
>
> I am doing a install of the jigdo DVD images for powerpc, using the 24.11.2004
> jigdo images, which should use RC2.
>
> Quik is still installed on my chrp/pegasos system, even though it should only
> be installed on oldw
FWIW, I'm in the process of adding some ugly hacks to hw-detect to make
it fall back to tulip if the other module is not on the initrd. In that
case it will also blacklist the de4x5 module to avoid discover1 loading
it in the second stage, and will add tulip to /etc/modules. I think this
should fix
network-console_0.0.9_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
network-console_0.0.9.dsc
network-console_0.0.9.tar.gz
network-console-config_0.0.9_all.deb
network-console_0.0.9_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 283377 + fixed
Bug#283377: Should not copy installer account to /target if
network-console-config not installed
Tags were: security pending
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
Accepted:
network-console-config_0.0.9_all.deb
to pool/main/n/network-console/network-console-config_0.0.9_all.deb
network-console_0.0.9.dsc
to pool/main/n/network-console/network-console_0.0.9.dsc
network-console_0.0.9.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/network-console/network-console_0.0.9.tar.gz
netwo
FWIW, this is all due to netcfg calculating default values for these
things based on the ip address and other info. It's tricky to do that and
allow for preseeding too; one way would be for netcfg to skip changing
the values if the question already has a non-empty value. It's possible
this would le
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:26:01PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > I don't follow this. You read the partition table, modify the type for one
> > partition type, write it back.
>
> If the file system type is unchanged partman can not know whether the
> partition type is modified or not. Thats wh
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 12:19:32PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Package: partman
> Severity: normal
> Tags: d-i
>
> - Add confirmation dialog for the button of the main
> partitioning menu. Thanks to Yann Dirson, closes: #241476.
>
> This dialog is very annoying, manages to be quite conf
Your message dated Wed, 1 Dec 2004 14:34:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FWD: Fixed in NMU of network-console 0.0.9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 02:13:50PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Package: debian-installer
> > Severity: important
> >
> >
> > I am doing a install of the jigdo DVD images for powerpc, using the
> > 24.11.2004
> > jigdo images, which should use RC2.
> >
> > Quik is still inst
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 08:47:57PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > In many cases this
> > means that partman will have to write unchanged partition tables.
>
> So what ?
At least the kernel will complain. But yes - this is a solution,
although not nice in my opinion.
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UN
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 02:13:50PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Package: debian-installer
> > Severity: important
> >
> >
> > I am doing a install of the jigdo DVD images for powerpc, using the
> > 24.11.2004
> > jigdo images, which should use RC2.
> >
> > Quik is still inst
Package:
Version: (recent stable net install version)
The linux worked with the linksys card but not with the CNet card. I'm
submitting this because this information might be useful to someone else.
The automatic DHCP / BOOTP did not work with the CNet NIC. I tried
using both the dmfe driver
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 282358 installation-reports
Bug#282358: install: automatic network configuration: worked with linksys card
but not CNet card
Warning: Unknown package '282358'
Warning: Unknown package '282358'
Bug reassigned from package `' to `installation-re
ddetect_1.11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ddetect_1.11.dsc
ddetect_1.11.tar.gz
ethdetect_1.11_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_1.11_all.udeb
hw-detect_1.11_i386.udeb
archdetect_1.11_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCR
Accepted:
archdetect_1.11_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_1.11_i386.udeb
ddetect_1.11.dsc
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_1.11.dsc
ddetect_1.11.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_1.11.tar.gz
ethdetect_1.11_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_1.11_all.udeb
hw-detect-full
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
hw-detect-full_1.11_all.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says
optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and th
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Joey Hess wrote:
> FWIW, this is all due to netcfg calculating default values for these
> things based on the ip address and other info. It's tricky to do that and
> allow for preseeding too;
So the comments in the example preseed file[1] which say "If you prefer to
configure
Your message dated Wed, 01 Dec 2004 16:17:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#282814: fixed in ddetect 1.11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 01 Dec 2004 16:17:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#283754: fixed in ddetect 1.11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 11:10:01PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 08:47:57PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > > In many cases this
> > > means that partman will have to write unchanged partition tables.
> >
> > So what ?
>
> At least the kernel will complain. But yes -
Package: netcfg
Version: 1.07
Severity: important
There seems to be a typo in dhcp.c line 52 (function netcfg_write_dhcp):
a hyphen is missing in "ad-hoc".
52c52
< (mode == MANAGED) ? "managed" : "ad-hoc");
---
> (mode == MANAGED) ? "managed" : "adhoc");
Furthermore t
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: August 2004, image from www.debian.org
uname -a: Linux legolas 2.6.7-1-386 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:08:04 EDT 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: November 2 2004, 0:30 am
Method: Sarge ISO image disk 1, booted from CD ROM
Machine: Soltek Qbic EQ3
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 04:11:07PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Translations that have been officially included (es, fr, ja, pt_BR, sp)
sp?
> ===
> For these any changes made in the Sarge branch in the English docs should
> preferably be translated as we
Your message dated Wed, 1 Dec 2004 22:06:53 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#283888: INSTALL REPORT
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Thu, 2 Dec 2004 01:11:12 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Package: palo-installer
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
The postinst uses /target/bin/sed a lot. According to waldi, this is
unsafe, it assumes that the d-i libc matches the one on the installed
system. It would be better to use stuff on the d-i initrd, or chroot to
call /target's sed. IIRC, d-i _has_
Package: palo-installer
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
The debconf template in palo-installer is never used, it just bloats the
package and the po files. I suggest removing it, unless someone has
plans to use it in the near future.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 05:45:59PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:54:02AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > * Horms wrote:
> > > The new packages are available, look for the ones dated 29th
> > > November.
> >
> > Thanks, new kernel-source-2.4.27 works fine on alpha.
>
> Than
Your message dated Thu, 2 Dec 2004 07:05:07 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#283831: Package: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Thu, 2 Dec 2004 06:55:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#283827: Package: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Quoting Paul Telford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > FWIW, this is all due to netcfg calculating default values for these
> > things based on the ip address and other info. It's tricky to do that and
> > allow for preseeding too;
>
> So the comments in the exampl
Hmmm, you should have kept the original bug number of your install
report in copy. Doing so, and keeping your whole answer.
Quoting Norval Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> The Gigabyte GA-K8NS Pro motherboard has four points you can plug a SATA
> drive cable.
> They are SATA0_SB and SATA1_SB, both c
82 matches
Mail list logo
