On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 01:41:32AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Monday, August 30, 2004, at 04:41 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 08:23:28AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> >>On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 01:58:34AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> >>>
> >>>Sven Luther wrote:
> Rick
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 03:57:40PM +0200, Nicolas Raspail wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've a problem installing Debian on my 7043-150 (powerpc 604e, chrp I
Are you sure that this is a chrp, and not a prep machine ?
> think). I've tried the DI rc1 on sarge ppc and woody's bootdisks but I
> always have an e
|--==> "AZ" == Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AZ> Hi!
AZ> Initialy it defaulted to bytes so people had to write 200m for swap or
AZ> 6g for /usr. Changing bytes to megabytes was some progress but for
AZ> gigabytes we need more time. ;-)
:)
Maybe an explicit and visible ind
New information:
When starting the shell, it claims that hard disks are mounted under /target. But such
a directory does not exist.
The hard disk is detected - but under /dev/discs/disc0/disc. Issuing ln -s
/dev/discs/disc0/disc /dev/hda makes fdisk recognize the partition table. But the
parti
Hi,
I have just learnt that the bug I encountered when trying to install Sarge is known
under #242114 (Finds no
partition table on a disk with partition table recognisable by fdisk), and is 148 (!!)
days old. Is there a means
to find out what the status is, and when a fix can be expected?
Tha
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 09:19:28AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 01:41:32AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, August 30, 2004, at 04:41 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > >On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 08:23:28AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >>On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 01:58
Hello,
I downloaded Debian-installer RC1(i386) and all went fine but the kernel
installed was kernel-image-2.6.7-1-386 while another one
(kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686) should have been used instead.
Here is a copy of my /proc/cpuinfo:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family
Hi,
I just have learnt from the bug report pages that the bug I encountered was also
reported in
Bug #247108: Doesn't see existing partition table
and closed. But the bug is still there! In the meantime, I also have tried with rc1,
but I found exactly the same
behaviour: the partition manager j
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 10:12:41AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just learnt that the bug I encountered when trying to install Sarge is known
> under #242114 (Finds no
> partition table on a disk with partition table recognisable by fdisk), and is 148
> (!!) days old. Is ther
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 10:53:55AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Please try the (2.6) floppies at :
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~luther/miboot/floppy-2.6-2004.08.31
Spitted out immediately, kernel is not loaded from floppy. If I mount
the image, it only contains vmlinuz.
> > As well as
Hello,
Can you give me any help (steps , links or instruction) how install debian S390 on
mainframe (zSeries).
Thanks for help
Tomasz Pijanowski
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 265845 debian-installer
Bug#265845: installation-reports
Bug reassigned from package `alsa-base' to `debian-installer'.
> retitle 265845 Don't load OSS modules on boot?
Bug#265845: installation-reports
Changed Bug title.
> tags 265845 d-i
Bug
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/sparc/20040830/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux ikari.its.monash.edu.au 2.4.26-sparc32 #1 Sun Jun 20 02:18:47 PDT 2004
sparc GNU/Linux
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 03:53:0
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: rc1, 2 Aug 2004, from ftp.debian.org.
uname -a: Linux eclipse 2.4.26-sparc64 #1 Sun Jun 20 02:39:17 PDT 2004 sparc64
GNU/Linux
Date: 30 Aug 2004
Method: CD-ROM installer (using cdrom-mini.iso), followed by net install
(ht
Package: discover1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n, patch
Heyaaa!!!
in attachement there is updated Slovak translation (sk.po)
of discover1, please include.
thanks
--
5o Peter.Mann at tuke.sk
discover1-1.6.5_sk.tgz
Description: GNU Unix tar archive
Guillaume: i think you where not the one who submitted your patch at
http://xilun666.free.fr/parted-1.6.6-hfs-9.patch for inclusion in the debian
parted package, but could you have a look at this all the same ?
Hello,
You have provided patches to be included in the debian parted packages, namely
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 11:55:28AM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 10:53:55AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Please try the (2.6) floppies at :
> > >
> > > http://people.debian.org/~luther/miboot/floppy-2.6-2004.08.31
>
> Spitted out immediately, kernel is not
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:44:28PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sven Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 12:22 PM
> > To: Zenker, Matthias (Otometrics Stuttgart)
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Status of Bug ##2
> -Original Message-
> From: Sven Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 12:22 PM
> To: Zenker, Matthias (Otometrics Stuttgart)
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge:
> debian-installer partitioning failure]
>
>
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:42:44PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> and see if your patches are to be discarded because already submitted
> upstream, or need to be modified ? To help you, here is a subset of the
> ChangeLog file of parted upstream between 1.6.9 and 1.6.12 :
Notice for debian-boot folk,
> -Original Message-
> From: Sven Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 3:04 PM
> To: Zenker, Matthias (Otometrics Stuttgart)
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge:
> debian-installer partition
linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.63_source+m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.63.dsc
linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.63.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.2.25-mac-di_0.63_m68k.udeb
nic-shared-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.63_m68k.udeb
ppp-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.63_m6
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-1-sparc32-di_0.01_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-1-sparc32-di_0.01_sparc.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-1-sparc64-di_0.01_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-1-sparc64-di_
Accepted:
brltty-modules-2.4.27-1-itanium-smp-di_0.56_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64/brltty-modules-2.4.27-1-itanium-smp-di_0.56_ia64.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-1-itanium-smp-di_0.56_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-1-itanium-smp-di_0
Accepted:
brltty-modules-2.4.27-1-386-di_0.67_i386.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386/brltty-modules-2.4.27-1-386-di_0.67_i386.udeb
brltty-modules-2.4.27-speakup-di_0.67_i386.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386/brltty-modules-2.4.27-speakup-di_0.67_i386.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.2
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 03:00:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Could you provide the reported geometry on both a 2.4 kernel
> > and a 2.6 kernel ? This is probably the infamous 2.6 geometry
> > bug/feature/whatver.
>
> Geometry reported by what? fdisk -l?
> I could boot Knoppix once with
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:45:45PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 11:55:28AM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 10:53:55AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Please try the (2.6) floppies at :
> > > >
> > > > http://people.debian.org/~luthe
fat-modules-2.2.25-atari-di_0.63_m68k.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k/fat-modules-2.2.25-atari-di_0.63_m68k.udeb
fat-modules-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.63_m68k.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k/fat-modules-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.63_m68k.udeb
fat-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.63_m68k.udeb
to
Package: partman-auto
Severity: serious
Version: 31
I found new partman-auto sets mount option for some partitions.
- add "noatime" mount option in the atomic and home recipes. Thanks
to Ryan Underwood, closes: #265295
- add mount options in the multi_user recipes:
"nodev"
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: RC1 31AUG04
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc1/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
uname -a: Linux peg 2.6.7 #1 Wed Jul 21 00:02:54 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 31AUG04 0947 EST
Method: boot from cd. "linux26 debian-in
> -Original Message-
> From: Sven Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 3:38 PM
> To: Zenker, Matthias (Otometrics Stuttgart)
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge:
> debian-installer partitioni
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 03:41:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Please try the (2.6) floppies at :
>
> http://people.debian.org/~luther/miboot/floppy-2.6-2004.08.31
boot.img only contains vmlinuz and doesn't boot, ofonlyboot.img starts
loading a kernel and ends with the tux/red cross.
> http://pe
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:13:08PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sven Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 3:38 PM
> > To: Zenker, Matthias (Otometrics Stuttgart)
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re:
Accepted:
fat-modules-2.2.25-atari-di_0.63_m68k.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k/fat-modules-2.2.25-atari-di_0.63_m68k.udeb
fat-modules-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.63_m68k.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k/fat-modules-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.63_m68k.udeb
fat-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.63_m68
Sven Luther wrote:
> This should be fixed in 1.6.12 for which i am preparing packages, but it
> breaks binary compatibility, so using this is a no-go for sarge as i
> understand, as parted is part of base, which was frozen by start of august.
It can probably be argued that this is a release critic
linux-kernel-di-arm_0.55_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-arm_0.55.dsc
linux-kernel-di-arm_0.55.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.27-netwinder-di_0.55_arm.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.27-netwinder-di_0.55_arm.udeb
nic-extra-modules-2.4.27-netwinder-di_0.5
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 10:41:10AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > This should be fixed in 1.6.12 for which i am preparing packages, but it
> > breaks binary compatibility, so using this is a no-go for sarge as i
> > understand, as parted is part of base, which was frozen by start
Miguel Quaremme wrote:
> I downloaded Debian-installer RC1(i386) and all went fine but the kernel
> installed was kernel-image-2.6.7-1-386 while another one
> (kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686) should have been used instead.
This is expected behavior if you were installing from a netinst CD,
which only ha
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:37:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sven Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 4:45 PM
> > To: Zenker, Matthias (Otometrics Stuttgart)
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:15:01PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 03:41:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Please try the (2.6) floppies at :
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~luther/miboot/floppy-2.6-2004.08.31
>
> boot.img only contains vmlinuz and doesn't boot, ofonl
> -Original Message-
> From: Sven Luther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 4:45 PM
> To: Zenker, Matthias (Otometrics Stuttgart)
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Status of Bug ##242114 ? [Re: Bug#269036: Sarge:
> debian-installer partition
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-bast-di_0.55_arm.udeb standard debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM support for the Linux kernel.
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-netwinder-di_0.55_arm.udeb standard debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM support
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> clone 269163 -1
Bug#269163: base install fails on HP ProLiant dl360g3 (using 20040830/netinst)
Bug 269163 cloned as bug 269236.
> reassign -1 netcfg
Bug#269236: base install fails on
partman_50_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman_50.dsc
partman_50.tar.gz
partman_50_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
Matt Taggart wrote:
> 0.) HP ProLiant systems have a remote management device called an "intergrated
> Lights Out" ("iLO"). This device intercepts the system's vga text and keyboard
> and makes it available via telnet. As long as the system stays in vga text
> mode it works great but if you try
Sven Luther wrote:
> I would much rather upload to sid, and let it go in hinted, but i suppose
> t-p-u is the way to go, i never was able to do so in the past though, and the
> 1.6.9-3.2 upload Matt tried also failed.
parted | 1.6.9-3.2 | testing | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64,
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:02:16 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#259868: fixed in partman 50
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:02:16 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#265293: fixed in partman 50
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Accepted:
partman_50.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_50.dsc
partman_50.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_50.tar.gz
partman_50_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_50_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 259868 265293
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-bast-di_0.55_arm.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-bast-di_0.55_arm.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-netwinder-di_0.55_arm.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-netwinder-di_0.55_arm.udeb
fat-modules
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Just did a test install with this:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
dated 31 Aug, and when asked for partitioning, selected "Multi-User
Workstation" (IIRC -- the last of the partitioning opt
Hi Sven,
this mail contains some lengthy, however truncated outputs.
If you want to see the full files, I can send them to you off-list (unless you want
them to be posted on the list).
I hope that you will find the information you need to tell what the error was.
I should perhaps paste a commen
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> I think the partman packages finaly have the shape/features I'd like
> them to have in sarge.
I've had to revert all the mount option stuff in the new partman-auto,
because it broke dpkg (#269253). I have to say, I'm somewhat dismayed by
the number of apparently untested ch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> severity 269253 grave
Bug#269253: debian-installer: /var set to mount with noexec, which breaks
postinst/config/etc. scripts
Severity set to `grave'.
> reassign 269253 partman-auto
B
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 07:51:01AM +0200, Erik C.J. Laan wrote:
> no http proxy configured otherwise. Booted with "ramdisk_size=13000
> debug=ser console=tty0" added to my 'normal' Linux/mac68k bootoptions
> (mac53c9x=1,0).
cool, a serial install on a mac.
> The "low memory mode" textbox look
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:54:37 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I strongly believe that l-c has come to a point that is almost
production-ready (reasons are given below) and can be included in
Debian.
It has been uploaded today to the Debian archive so that anyone can
test.
Debconf preseeding works as
partman-auto_32_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto_32.dsc
partman-auto_32.tar.gz
partman-auto_32_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
lilo-installer_1.01_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lilo-installer_1.01.dsc
lilo-installer_1.01.tar.gz
lilo-installer_1.01_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
partman-partitioning_26_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-partitioning_26.dsc
partman-partitioning_26.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_26_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
partman-basicmethods_21_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-basicmethods_21.dsc
partman-basicmethods_21.tar.gz
partman-basicmethods_21_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
FWIW, lilo-installer has been hacked to work with either syntax of lvm
device named. I have filed a bug on the lvm tools to work with either
syntax. Which syntax partman-lvm should use, I don't know, leaving this
bug open in case we should change it.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Dig
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:17:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#269227: fixed in partman-auto 32
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:17:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#269253: fixed in partman-auto 32
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Accepted:
lilo-installer_1.01.dsc
to pool/main/l/lilo-installer/lilo-installer_1.01.dsc
lilo-installer_1.01.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lilo-installer/lilo-installer_1.01.tar.gz
lilo-installer_1.01_i386.udeb
to pool/main/l/lilo-installer/lilo-installer_1.01_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Accepted:
partman-auto_32.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_32.dsc
partman-auto_32.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_32.tar.gz
partman-auto_32_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_32_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 269227 269253
grub-installer_1.02_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
grub-installer_1.02.dsc
grub-installer_1.02.tar.gz
grub-installer_1.02_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:32:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#266307: fixed in grub-installer 1.02
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Accepted:
partman-partitioning_26.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_26.dsc
partman-partitioning_26.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_26.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_26_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_26
Accepted:
grub-installer_1.02.dsc
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.02.dsc
grub-installer_1.02.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.02.tar.gz
grub-installer_1.02_i386.udeb
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.02_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Accepted:
partman-basicmethods_21.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-basicmethods/partman-basicmethods_21.dsc
partman-basicmethods_21.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-basicmethods/partman-basicmethods_21.tar.gz
partman-basicmethods_21_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-basicmethods/partman-basicmethods_21
Installing with
Linux kwai 2.6.7-1-686 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:36:53 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
from an rc1 businesscard CD image
worked without a problem.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
partman-lvm_23_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-lvm_23.dsc
partman-lvm_23.tar.gz
partman-lvm_23_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 07:52:18PM +0300, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
> I strongly believe that l-c has come to a point that is almost
> production-ready (reasons are given below) and can be included in
> Debian.
> It has been upl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 267677 + fixed
Bug#267677: [RC1] Success: i386, root on LVM, in spite of complaint from d-i
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 269206 + pending
Bug#269206: [l10n] Updated Slovak translation of discover1
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
Hi,
Question:
Alioth README seems newer and correct for anonymous SVN checkout.
Should I update Debian web site description?
Background:
I was wondering why I can not check out from SVN repository while others
seems to have no issues.
I was following Debian web page:
http://www.debian.or
tag 267677 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:18:57 -0400
Source: partman-lvm
Binary: partman-lvm
Architecture: source all
V
Accepted:
partman-lvm_23.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_23.dsc
partman-lvm_23.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_23.tar.gz
partman-lvm_23_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_23_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting bugs to severity fixed: 267677
tags 269206 + pending
thanks
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:05:43PM +0200, Peter Mann wrote:
> Heyaaa!!!
> in attachement there is updated Slovak translation (sk.po)
> of discover1, please include.
Thank you very much. I uploaded them to the CVS rep.
Dennis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Hi,
Bulgarian uses CP1251, and termwrap currently uses jfbterm for it. Is
this really needed?
For Russian's KOI8-R, nothing is done in termwrap. How KOI8-R is setup
for stage 2, so that we make CP1251 to be setup in the same way?
Regards,
ogi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 261476 +pending
Bug#261476: languagechooser entry for bulgarian
Tags were: l10n d-i
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:16:18 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of partman-lvm 23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 08.29.04
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/hppa/current/sarge-hppa-netinst.iso
uname -a:
Date: 08.29.04
Method: boot from cd net install
Machine: HP PA-RISC C180 Visualize
Processor: $cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 268580 grub-installer
Bug#268580: GRUB hangs on first boot after base install
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `grub-installer'.
>
End of message, stopping p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 268790 boot-floppies
Bug#268790: No way to create basedebs.tar from CD images set
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `boot-floppies'.
>
End of message, stoppin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 268103 boot-floppies
Bug#268103: Bug in install procedure
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `boot-floppies'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Plea
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 266861 hw-detect
Bug#266861: debian-installer: Hang on toshiba S310CDS while detecting cdrom
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `hw-detect'.
>
End of message,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 265845 discover1
Bug#265845: Don't load OSS modules on boot?
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `discover1'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pleas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> tags 264584 pending
Bug#264584: debian-installer: Doesn't load "thermal" or "fan" ACPI modules in 2.6
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 266123 quik-installer
Bug#266123: debian-installer: [powerpc] default ext3 isn't accepted by Quix and
setting ext2 reformats, but doesn't reinstall base
Bug reassigned from p
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:38:50 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:40:56 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing, preseeding implemented
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 259942 installation-reports
Bug#259942: d-i dated 2004 07 13 failled to boot on a sparc sunblade 100
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `installation-reports'.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 259914 hw-detect
Bug#259914: sparc - Fujitsu MAP3367NC should be predefined in list
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `hw-detect'.
>
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 268815 languagechooser
Bug#268815: Second stage in debian-installer starts up in english when swithcing
languages during first stage
Bug reassigned from package `debian-insta
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 268815 languagechooser, countrychooser
Bug#268815: Second stage in debian-installer starts up in english when swithcing
languages during first stage
Bug reassigned from packa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 266806 partman
Bug#266806: debian-installer: confusing partitioning dialog if no HD present
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `partman'.
>
End of message, sto
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:49:33 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Joey Hess writes...
> That's nasty, whoever designed that should be spanked. If the system
> doesn't want to work in graphics mode, it should not pretend there's a
> graphics capable card there, then syslinux would not use graphics
> mode...
Well it's displaying on the vga console at the same ti
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
