Bug#241011: success, but failed to find CD drives

On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 02:34:51AM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote: > If you can confirm they are no longer present, I will close this report. I'm sorry, but I can't try it again ATM. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.or

Bug#261834: install: cannot partition for aboot on alpha

Hi Steve, thanks for your quick reply. Things are looking better now, but are not completely perfect yet. > > culprit: partitioning of the second disk should never modify previous > > settings for sda > > Auto-partitioning means that you're allowing the system to choose a > fixed partition la

Bug#261460: Is anyone else seeing this? -- Re: Bug#261460: Non-DHCP network config step of d-i is broken

On Wednesday, July 28, 2004, at 04:27 PM, Joshua Kwan wrote: On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 03:40:30PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote: Please, somebody, give it a try and let me know I'm not going crazy. It doesn't take very long to get to the point where this bug manifests itself, and you don't ever get to th

Re: cardmgr start message during base install (extra packages)

Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > I guess we could do both, and remove the dummy start-stop-daemon when > everything is using invoke-rc.d. Seems like a good idea. I'll make pcmcia-cs use invoke-rc.d then. -- Pelle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub

Processing of nobootloader_0.0.17_powerpc.changes

nobootloader_0.0.17_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: nobootloader_0.0.17.dsc nobootloader_0.0.17.tar.gz nobootloader_0.0.17_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubs

Re: [l10n:ro]iso-codes_iso_3166 - update

On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 12:05:40AM +0300, eddyp wrote: > Sorry, I sent an outdated file. Apparently I had the newer version on my > desktop. (now working on laptop) > > Could you please checkin this file? done. Thank you. But the package including the "old" version seems already to be uploaded.

nobootloader_0.0.17_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: nobootloader_0.0.17.dsc to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_0.0.17.dsc nobootloader_0.0.17.tar.gz to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_0.0.17.tar.gz nobootloader_0.0.17_all.udeb to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_0.0.17_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Than

Re: New d-i devcamp?

On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 11:51:41PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.07.26.2352 +0200]: > > OK. 5 people confirmed their interest in a d-i devcamp. > > Please add me to the list of interested parties. Me too, altough it may be that i may no

Re: New d-i devcamp?

On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 01:36:24AM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wednesday 28 July 2004 15:19, Matt Kraai wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:27:24AM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > > > >also sprach Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTEC

Incomplete upload found in Debian upload queue

Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in the Debian upload queue directory: linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.67.dsc linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.67.tar.gz This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job cannot be processed. If no .changes file arrives withi

Bug#261766: OldWorld PowerPC d-i still some bugs left

On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 10:10:18PM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote: > Note 0: > > The new 2.6-only businesscard image is groovy. It's certainly > smaller and sleeker. But there are still situations where a 2.6 > kernel won't work, and 2.4 is still needed. (see Bug#261463: > "Missin

Re: Bug#261873: Move setserial out of base (?)

* Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-28 19:39]: > In bug #212646 you can see the reason why I want this to be done. > I have checked on debian-qa and people there seems to agree with > me that setserial is no longer needed to be a part of base. It > should be "just another package that you

Bug#261988: installation-reports: only minor problems

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Debian-installer-version: pxeboot.tar from 26th of july 2004 uname -a: Linux portable 2.4.26-1-686 #1 Sat May 1 18:04:05 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 27 and 28 july 2004 Method: I used the pxeboot to start the installer and got packages through a pr

Bug#261987: mkinitrd needs mdadm for RAID arrays

Package: debian-installer Version: 1.0rc-1 Sarge netinst When installing on a soft raid array, mkinitrd needs a valid raidtab. The package to install is mdadm (but the error message says it needs raidtools2 (bug reported to initrd-tools ). Installing raidtools2 does not create the raidtab. So if

Bug#261766: OldWorld PowerPC d-i still some bugs left

On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 01:03:15PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 10:10:18PM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote: > > Note 0: > > > > The new 2.6-only businesscard image is groovy. It's certainly > > smaller and sleeker. But there are still situations where a 2.6 > > ker

Re: Bug#261873: Move setserial out of base (?)

[Martin Michlmayr] > I'd also like to see "#247906: Please don't install boot loaders" > addressed (at least on mips/mipsel, I cannot speak for the other > arches with 100% confidence). As far as I can see, the following archs still install the boot loader in debootstrap v0.2.40: alpha: aboot

Processing of linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.67_powerpc.changes

linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.67_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.67.dsc linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.67.tar.gz kernel-image-2.6.7-powerpc-di_0.67_powerpc.udeb nic-modules-2.6.7-powerpc-di_0.67_powerpc.udeb nic-extra-m

linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.67_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: affs-modules-2.6.7-power3-di_0.67_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6/affs-modules-2.6.7-power3-di_0.67_powerpc.udeb affs-modules-2.6.7-power4-di_0.67_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6/affs-modules-2.6.7-power4-di_0.67_powerpc.udeb affs-mod

Re: Bug#261873: Move setserial out of base (?)

[I'm not on debian-boot; please respect the Reply-To] On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 13:44:48 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > What really has to happen for this is an upload of debootstrap which > doesn't install it. I'd very like to see such an upload. I'd also like > to see "#247906: Please don't in

Re: Bug#261873: Move setserial out of base (?)

J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: [I'm not on debian-boot; please respect the Reply-To] On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 13:44:48 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: What really has to happen for this is an upload of debootstrap which doesn't install it. I'd very like to see such an upload. I'd also like to see "#

Bug#262047: debian-installer detect HP DL140 netadapter failed

Package: debian-installer Version: 2004-07-27 When I use linux26 to start installation then the netadapter can't detected. But , if I use linux to start installation, it can detected Broadcom eXetrem BCM5704 . I am using Debian-sarge-i386.iso (2004-07-27) to install sarge (kernel 2.6) into HP DL

Bug#261766: OldWorld PowerPC d-i still some bugs left

> I did, a couple of days ago. As you say, debian-cd on gluck needs a cvs > update of tools/boot/sarge/boot-powerpc. manty? Sorry, my fault, I thought I had updated that already, but I hadn't, I have just updated it right now, so today's build should be ok. Regards.. -- Manty/BestiaTester -> htt

Processed: Re: Bug#262043: cdimage.debian.org: I am using the daily sarge iso images to create a local mirror. Instalation fails attempting to partition a disk

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 262043 partman Bug#262043: cdimage.debian.org: I am using the daily sarge iso images to create a local mirror. Instalation fails attempting to partition a disk Bug reassigned from package `cdimage.debian.org' to `partman'. > retitle 262043 do

Bug#262070: failed installation report

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040727/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: Linux lovesong 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 2004 07 28 at about 3P.M. EDT Method: Used SBM to boot from

Bug#261745: bug#262070

I repeated the installation with a recent daily build, it failed in the same way, so the bug is not just an obsolete beta-4 bug. See bug#262070 for a more recent installation report. -- hendrik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA

Bug#262082: discover1-data: recognize more Radeon video cards

Package: discover1-data Version: 1.2004.07.25 Severity: wishlist :00:10.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV350 [Mobility Radeon 9600 M10] :00:10.0 0300: 1002:4e50 This should be "video" and "Server:XFree86(ati)". I suspect at least most of the Radeon 9[5678]00 entrie

Finite element modeling in MATLAB

Dear Colleague, Have you heard of FEMLAB before? It's a finite element modeling software package with a smooth interface to MATLAB. Get a first glance of FEMLAB and demo models by getting a free Tour CD 2004 at http://www.comsol.com/tourcd. FEMLAB is used in research, product development an

Bug#262071: Debian-installer install report

Package: installation-reports > INSTALL REPORT > > Debian-installer-version: base-installer 0.093 > uname -a: Now: Linux saphir 2.6.7-1-k7 #1 Thu Jul 8 06:45:35 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux (installed using kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386) > Date: ??? > Method: How did you install? What did you boot o

Bug#238301: After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded

Mark Brown wrote: > I've found some more instances of this problem. I managed to catch a > diff of the config files before and after the upgrade, though I didn't > remember to rerun the upgrade or cache the entire database: Now I understand. This is because debootstrap installs packages using the

release status update

I've submitted what I hope will be the final debian-installer build to the autobuilders, but it seems that recent dependency breakage in newt will cause some of the builds to fail. I hope I can ask the autobuilders to retry, but this will likely delay things for a few days. At this point it's prob

Processing of base-installer_1.01_powerpc.changes

base-installer_1.01_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: base-installer_1.01.dsc base-installer_1.01.tar.gz base-installer_1.01_powerpc.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "un

Bug#262106: debian-installer: typo in german translation

Package: debian-installer Severity: minor Tags: l10n Current debian-installer as downloaded from http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/ has a typo in the german translation. It should read "Grundsystem" instead of "Grunsystem". -- System Information: Debian Release:

Bug#262108: Debian Installation Report

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 2004-07-29 from uname -a: impossible to run it Date: 2004-07-29 21:38:12 Method: using Atari boot floppy Machine: Atari Falcon030 with AfterBurner040 (MC68040), NOVA Mach64 g

base-installer_1.01_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: base-installer_1.01.dsc to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.01.dsc base-installer_1.01.tar.gz to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.01.tar.gz base-installer_1.01_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.01_powerpc.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PRO

Bug#262108: Debian Installation Report

Does this machine usually run linux? If so, what version of the kernel? Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED

Trying to install to SATA drives on RAID 1 [REPOST #2]

I'm going to give this one more try. Please reply via email as i won't be subscribed to this list for long. I thought i had documented this problem clearly and in the right place - if i haven't *please let me know so i can find the _right_ place*. Hi folks, My Debian installation saga

Re: please help us test the next debian-installer release

On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 03:33:46PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > I'm writing you because you're listed in our records as someone who can > help test the Debian sarge installer on m68k (MVME162). > > We're close to the finalising the next release of the installer, and I hope > you can help us by testin

Bug#241011: marked as done ([i386] [beta3] [unknown] success, but failed to find CD drives)

Your message dated Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:21:32 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#241011: success, but failed to find CD drives has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#240963: failed to find CD after boot; successful network install

Sorry, the machine that I installed on and submitted that report from, currently has its harddrive full with 40GB of movies and music. It is running Fedora Core 2. I do plan on switching to Debian once Sarge goes stable. Anyway, after I submitted that report, another release candidate of the S

Bug#240367: marked as done ([i386] [20040319] [businesscard] various problems)

Your message dated Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:17:42 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#240367: various problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respo

Processed: Re: Bug#262106: debian-installer: typo in german translation

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 262106 + pending Bug#262106: debian-installer: typo in german translation Tags were: l10n Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, D

Processed: Re: Bug#240959: failed to find CD after boot

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 240959 -1 Bug#240959: [i386] [beta3] [netinst] failed to find CD after boot Bug 240959 cloned as bug 262140. > reassign -1 cdrom-detect Bug#262140: [i386] [beta3] [netinst] failed to find CD after boot Bug reassigned from package `installation-re

Bug#262106: debian-installer: typo in german translation

tags 262106 + pending thanks On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 09:15:39PM +0200, Sebastian Stark wrote: > Package: debian-installer > Severity: minor > Tags: l10n > > Current debian-installer as downloaded from > > http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/ > > has a typo in the

Bug#240959: marked as done ([i386] [beta3] [netinst] failed to find CD after boot)

Your message dated Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:47:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#240959: failed to find CD after boot has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#240963: marked as done ([i386] [beta3] [netinst] failed to find CD after boot; successful network install)

Your message dated Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:36:38 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#240963: failed to find CD after boot; successful network install has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Re: release status update

On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 03:11:11PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > I've submitted what I hope will be the final debian-installer build to the > autobuilders, but it seems that recent dependency breakage in newt will > cause some of the builds to fail. I hope I can ask the autobuilders to > retry, but thi

sid_d-i breakage, debootstrap hotfixes, and TODO for per-arch bootloader maintainers

Today's upload of debootstrap implemented the change described at http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/04/msg00634.html ff. to remove all bootloaders from the base system. Unfortunately, d-i itself is not ready for such a change, as most of the bootloaders in question don't yet have installers

Bug#262182: elilo-installer must call apt-install elilo

Package: elilo-installer Version: 0.0.5 Severity: important As discussed at http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/04/msg00634.html ff., debootstrap should not be responsible for installing bootloader packages; this should be handled by the installer. Please update elilo-installer to call "apt-

Bug#262188: silo-installer must call apt-install silo

Package: silo-installer Version: 0.0.6 Severity: important As discussed at http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/04/msg00634.html ff., debootstrap should not be responsible for installing bootloader packages; this should be handled by the installer. Please update silo-installer to call "apt-in

Bug#262186: vmelilo-installer must call apt-install vmelilo

Package: vmelilo-installer Version: 1.3 Severity: important As discussed at http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/04/msg00634.html ff., debootstrap should not be responsible for installing bootloader packages; this should be handled by the installer. Please update vmelilo-installer to call "ap

Bug#262185: palo-installer must call apt-install palo

Package: palo-installer Version: 0.0.4 Severity: important As discussed at http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/04/msg00634.html ff., debootstrap should not be responsible for installing bootloader packages; this should be handled by the installer. Please update palo-installer to call "apt-in

Bug#262190: arcboot-installer must call apt-install dvhtool (?)

Package: arcboot-installer Version: 0.011 Severity: important As discussed at http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/04/msg00634.html ff., debootstrap should not be responsible for installing bootloader packages; this should be handled by the installer. Since arcboot-installer is the only insta

Lowmem problem on mips resurfaces

d-i's failing again on mips (Indy r4k) with 32 MB. Netbooting from a current svn build dies just after the base system components are downloaded, and the 20040729 sarge_d-i CD images start failing during network configuration as the VM begins to kill processes. The relevant message on v

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 261535 Running 'grub-install --no-floppy "(hd0)"' failed Bug#261535: grub fails: does not have any corresponding BIOS drive Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sy

Re: Lowmem problem on mips resurfaces

Nicholas Breen wrote: > d-i's failing again on mips (Indy r4k) with 32 MB. Netbooting from a > current svn build dies just after the base system components are > downloaded, and the 20040729 sarge_d-i CD images start failing during > network configuration as the VM begins to k

Processing of lowmem_1.00_i386.changes

lowmem_1.00_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lowmem_1.00.dsc lowmem_1.00.tar.gz lowmem_1.00_all.udeb lowmemcheck_1.00_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Bug#262197: debian-installer: stderr is discarded

Package: debian-installer Severity: normal I misspelt the name of my install proxy. The only message I got was that the mirror was invalid. On switching to tty2 I was able to enter the command from tty4 and so discovered my error. stderr should be captured (and maybe tailed), and when an error

lowmem_1.00_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: lowmem_1.00.dsc to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_1.00.dsc lowmem_1.00.tar.gz to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_1.00.tar.gz lowmem_1.00_all.udeb to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_1.00_all.udeb lowmemcheck_1.00_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmemcheck_1.00_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTE

lowmem override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): lowmemcheck_1.00_i386.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the p

Bug#262198: "Partition hard drives" fails on powerpc OldWorld PowerMac in 20040729 businesscard install.

Package: installation-reports powerpc businesscard 20040729 OldWorld PowerMac INSTALL REPORT Synopsis: "Partition hard drives" fails on powerpc OldWorld PowerMac on 20040729 businesscard install. Debian-installer-version: sid_d-i/powerpc/20040729 uname -a:

Bug#262200: debian-installer: d-i downloads unneeded packages

Package: debian-installer Severity: normal I'm doing a network install via modem. I've discovered d-i downloading, amongst others, jfs and lvm udebs. I won't be using either, so this is simply wasted time. I suggest that downloading and installing optional udebs be deferred until it's clear the

Crude Hack, or Elegant Solution

My effort at answering questions by inserting them into the environment failed. However, I've discovered env2debconf. With this small change: sed floppy/sbin/env2debconf \ -e 's/set -e/set -ex/' \ -e '/for/ s=\=set;cat /etc/env 2>/dev/null=' I can put a list into /etc/env and the an

Bug#262201: PowerMac (OldWorld) - no driver for onboard SCSI

Package: installation-reports powerpc 20040724 businesscard OldWorld PowerMac kernel-2.6 INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: sid_d-i/powerpc/20040724/sarge-powerpc-businesscard.iso Comments/Problems: The powerpc 2.6 kernel on the 20040724 businesscard CD is missing drivers (modules or

Bug#258351: Works now

Latest discover1 update (1.6.4) seems to have solved my problem. It installed fine this time. __ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT

IA32 - missing disk

The 2.6 kernel from Jul 2 (I think from Sid) doesn't detect my IDE drive. According to the log, the IDE modules are missing. 2.4 of the same date does detect it. I don't have logs to offer, and I'm about to look for newer vmlinuz and initrd.gz. -- Cheers John -- spambait [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMA

Processed: language tasks pull in reams of huge packages

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 202907 Bug#202907: language tasks pull in reams of huge packages Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debia

Bug#262200: debian-installer: d-i downloads unneeded packages

John wrote: Package: debian-installer Severity: normal I'm doing a network install via modem. I've discovered d-i downloading, amongst others, jfs and lvm udebs. I won't be using either, so this is simply wasted time. I suggest that downloading and installing optional udebs be deferred until it's c