Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I maintain that "expert" should map to DEBCONF_PRIORITY=medium, and that
> it should be DEBCONF_PRIORITY=*low* that requires people to type the
> incantation by hand. Most people who are considering themselves expert
> for these purposes are going to
Quoting Andre Felipe Machado ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hello,
> I am trying to migrate (new install) from a Conectiva Linux (RH variant) to
> Debian.
> Downloaded first sarge-i386-1.iso from unofficial hungarian site, dated 13 jun
> 2004.
> (did not get jigdo to download all needed files by that tem
reassign 255135 partman
severity 249322 normal
merge 249322 255135
thanks
Quoting Stephen Touset ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: normal
>
> Apparently, setting the noexec, nosuid, and/or nodev flags on the tmp
> partition cause the base installer to fail to execute,
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 08:46:56AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I maintain that "expert" should map to DEBCONF_PRIORITY=medium, and that
> > it should be DEBCONF_PRIORITY=*low* that requires people to type the
> > incantation by hand. Most peopl
> When there is something to test, please let me know, or let the
> debian-sparc list know. I've got an Ultra 30 and an Ultra 2 dedicated
> to testing d-i. (As well as a sparcstation LX and a sparcstation 20.)
If you have time at 16:00 UTC today, please join us on
#debian-boot. About 1-hour open
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2004 03:17:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#254860: fixed in discover1 1.6.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 03:14:52AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> The reason why the new busybox didn't get into testing was that it also
> required a new netcfg, and between those two the changes were very
> invasive for tc1.
In other words, a version that is known to be unusable is a better
test c
Accepted:
discover1-udeb_1.6.1_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.6.1_i386.udeb
discover1-udeb_1.6.1_sparc.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.6.1_sparc.udeb
discover1_1.6.1.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.6.1.dsc
discover1_1.6.1.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 255135 partman
Bug#255135: debian-installer: Filesystem flags allow for install snafu
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `partman'.
> severity 249322 normal
Bug#249322: Don't offer noexec option for /tmp
Severity set to `normal'
discover1_1.6.1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover1_1.6.1_i386.deb
libdiscover1_1.6.1_sparc.deb
discover1-udeb_1.6.1_sparc.udeb
discover1_1.6.1.tar.gz
discover1-udeb_1.6.1_i386.udeb
libdiscover1-pic_1.6.1_sparc.deb
discover1_1.6.1_sparc.deb
Quoting martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Can I move the installer screenshots I made into the alioth svn? I'd
> like to get them out of my hierarchy and manage them independently.
> We're talking 2 Mb...
>
> Awaiting your responses... maybe private...
I think they definitely do not belong
[bug not copied, not realy relivent. debian-boot copied directly.]
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 08:36:41AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Probably because some lack of manpower. Testing Sparc images on
> Sparc64 systems is really a problem for a while. During the whole
> Debconf we were indeed unab
I have summarized some points to be discussed during this meeting. Now
very well written and organised, but better this than nothing..:-)
http://people.debian.org/~bubulle/d-i/irc-meeting-20040619/topics.txt
People attending the meeting, please keep a window with this opened,
as a reference
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2004 09:12:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#255138: Installation report for TC1 on Dell PowerEdge 2650 (99%
Flawless!)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 02:11:12AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> With newer BIOS and newer Lilo and grub, this may not be the issue.
It is if you want to have / on LVM, Soft-RAID5 or similar.
Bastian
--
Only a fool fights in a burning house.
-- Kank the Klingon, "Day of the Dove",
* Matt Kraai [2004-06-18 09:00:36-0700]
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 12:08:45PM +0300, Recai Oktas wrote:
> > * Matt Kraai [2004-06-17 19:30:44-0700]
> > [previous patch]
> > > Should you also copy the code that handles LANGUAGE and
> > > LANGUAGE_INST?
> >
> > In fact, due to its importance, we shou
also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.06.19.0209 +0200]:
> Erk, that's a lot for developers to download over slow links. (Is Joey
> Hess still on dialup? If so, I'm sure he wouldn't appreciate a spurious
> 2MB download.)
Okay, I didn't think of that.
/me slaps himself.
also sprach C
also sprach Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.06.19.1135 +0200]:
> It is if you want to have / on LVM, Soft-RAID5 or similar.
A symlink is not going to fix that.
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud D
also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.06.19.0208 +0200]:
> How about we futz with this sort of thing near the beginning of
> a release cycle, not near the end?
Yeah, but that would actually be productive. We wouldn't want that.
I was on a rampage last night. I agree that it should n
also sprach Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.06.19.0307 +0200]:
> Please try starting the installer with 'linux
> DEBCONF-PRIORITY=medium' or 'expert'.
^- this should be _
> If you answer 'Yes' to the question 'start PCMCIA services', you
> will be given the opportunity to exclude
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2004 05:47:55 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#254452: fixed in base-config 2.30
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20040618,
debian/dists/unstable/main/installer-mips/current/images/r4k-ip22/netboot-boot.img
uname -a: Linux indigo 2.4.25-r4k-ip22 #1 Thu Apr 15 20:46:28 BST 2004 mips GNU/Linux
Date: 20040619
Method:
TFTP boot on the LAN, network
Quoting martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I can host them privately, no problem. I just thought it'd be
> logical.
Well, you assigned yourself this task of maintaining a set of
screenshots (which is definitely a good idea), thus I feel it's
logical they're hosted on your home in people.debia
base-config_2.30_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-config_2.30.dsc
base-config_2.30.tar.gz
base-config_2.30_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Quoting Aza Php ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Ok
> En fait, l'installation se passez très bien jusqu'au
> reboot et lors du démarrage, grub ne parait pas bien
> installé, l'ordinateur dit qu'il y a un problème de
> head sector et me propose soit d'appuyer sur H pour
> démarrer sur le disque dur (si j'appu
Accepted:
base-config_2.30.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.30.dsc
base-config_2.30.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.30.tar.gz
base-config_2.30_all.deb
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.30_all.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 254452
Thank
languagechooser_1.24_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
languagechooser_1.24.dsc
languagechooser_1.24.tar.gz
languagechooser_1.24_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
Accepted:
languagechooser_1.24.dsc
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.24.dsc
languagechooser_1.24.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.24.tar.gz
languagechooser_1.24_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.24_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PR
Julien BLACHE wrote:
[snip]
> Comments/Problems:
>
> I didn't remember that I had to create the partitions from last to
> first, I'm pretty sure I didn't do that when I installed woody on the
> machine a year ago. Anyway, I eventually figured out and partitioned
> the disk. Had to create an SGI di
Package: netcfg
Version: 0.70
Severity: minor
This is pretty minor, I admit, but the various documents that discuss
options in /etc/network/interfaces have been moving toward a standard of
using hyphens rather than underscores in option names. Either hyphens
or underscores can be used so this cha
also sprach Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.06.19.1208 +0200]:
> Well, you assigned yourself this task of maintaining a set of
> screenshots (which is definitely a good idea), thus I feel it's
> logical they're hosted on your home in people.debian.org
Logics are wonderful in that t
Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I didn't remember that I had to create the partitions from last to
>> first, I'm pretty sure I didn't do that when I installed woody on the
>> machine a year ago. Anyway, I eventually figured out and partitioned
>> the disk. Had to create an SGI disklabe
Julien BLACHE wrote:
[snip]
> >> Disappointment : no XFS support :(
> >>
> >> The bootloader installation went fine, but, unfortunately, it doesn't
> >> handle a separate /boot partition, so the machine couldn't reboot.
> >
> > Well, the firmware has no problem with booting from arbitrary
> >
Package: netcfg
Version: 0.70
Severity: wishlist
It would be helpful to the user who wants to install resolvconf if the
static nameserver information that netcfg writes directly to
/etc/resolv.conf were also written to /etc/network/interfaces in the
format required for it to get included in the dy
Package: partman-auto
Version: 20040617
Severity: wishlist
The one remaining advantage that autopartkit seems to have over
partman-auto is the creation of partitions like /home on logical
volumes. It would be great if partman-auto would automate this,
since users add harddrives over the lifetime o
Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> d-i should either workaround the "problem" (as I did), or it shouldn't
>> offer to create a /boot partition that will lead to a non-booting
>> machine :)
>
> Rather the latter, I think.
Yes, for a quick fix, as it shouldn't be /that/ hard to figure out
* AJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-18 17:29]:
> :00:0d.0 RAID bus controller: Promise Technology, Inc. PDC20378
> (SATA150 TX) (rev 02)
> Didn't detect my Hitachi Deskstar 250GB SATA drive.
Can you manually load the module with:
modprobe sata_promise
and see if that works? Can you try booti
* Marco Amadori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-25 15:32]:
> Not really surprised, my serial ata chipset is supported only from 2.6.6-rc1
> of linux kernel with sata-sis lkm.
Right, okay, so we'll get that once we have a newer kernel. Can you
paste the output of:
lspci -n
so we can make sure that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 251302 busybox-cvs
Bug#251302: size detection broken
Bug reassigned from package `partman-md' to `busybox-cvs'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 08:29:29PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > If you type disallowed characters in a logical volume name when
> > > configuring LVM, the installer doesn't notice and you get an
> > > unhelpful error message when it tries to run lvcreate. I think the
> > > dodgy character w
Bug #254036 is about bad german translation in base-config. Could any
of you have a look at it and update the translation?
http://bugs.debian.org/254036>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 255169 needs finish script to check that there's no /boot
Bug#255169: installation report: SGI Indigo2 (r4k IP22)
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 255169 arcboot-installer
Bug#255169: needs finish script to check that there's no /boot
Bug reassign
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> retitle 251302 busybox-cvs - ash does not support 64bit arithmetic
Bug#251302: size detection broken
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 255103 base-config
Bug#255103: partconf: failed to create mount points
Bug reassigned from package `partconf' to `base-config'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
* Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-19 12:50]:
> Well, the firmware has no problem with booting from arbitrary
> partitions, so a separate /boot makes little sense, and arcboot
> doesn't support it. This should be documented better.
Does arcboot not support it, or arcboot-installer?
--
M
* Herbert Kaminski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-18 18:42]:
> Kernel 2.6.6 was selected, but 2.4.25 was installed, so in stage 2
> no module was found, networking failed, installation could not
> finish.
This *might* be because 2.6.6 was removed from testing because it had
some problems. Can you c
* Patrick Caulfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-19 14:14]:
> Allowable characters are: alphanumerics and . _ - +
What about stuff like umlauts? (e.g. ä) [sorry, cannot test right
now]
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 255103 base-config
thanks
* martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-18 22:05]:
> Package: partconf
It's certainly not partconf which does this; I'm not 100% sure, but I
think it might be base-config.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
retitle 255169 needs finish script to check that there's no /boot
reassign 255169 arcboot-installer
thanks
* Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-19 12:50]:
> Well, the firmware has no problem with booting from arbitrary
> partitions, so a separate /boot makes little sense, and arcboot
> doe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 255105 + pending
Bug#255105: sh: export: `/root': not a valid identifier
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 250340 + pending
Bug#250340:
=?iso-8859-1?q?base-config=3A_=5BINTL=3Anb=5D_Updated_translations_for_No?=
=?iso-8859-1?q?r
* Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-19 15:49]:
> > In this case, we should add a finish.d script which check that there's
> > no separate /boot.
>
> Where? In partconf?
Oh fuck, true... what's the status of switching to partman anyway?
Apart from the libparted fix, what needs to be done?
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> retitle 255169 needs finish script to check that there's no /boot
> reassign 255169 arcboot-installer
> thanks
>
> * Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-19 12:50]:
> > Well, the firmware has no problem with booting from arbitrary
> > partitions, so a separate /boot
Quoting Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> * Patrick Caulfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-19 14:14]:
> > Allowable characters are: alphanumerics and . _ - +
>
> What about stuff like umlauts? (e.g. ä) [sorry, cannot test right
> now]
Currently unusable in cdebconf (seems to be a whiptail
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-19 12:50]:
> > Well, the firmware has no problem with booting from arbitrary
> > partitions, so a separate /boot makes little sense, and arcboot
> > doesn't support it. This should be documented better.
>
> Does arcboot not sup
Why is this bug on removing the aptitude dependency on base-config
tagged pending? The source in CVS still depend on aptitude, and I see
no changelog entries indicating anyone removing the dependency.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
also sprach Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.06.19.1525 +0200]:
> It's certainly not partconf which does this; I'm not 100% sure,
> but I think it might be base-config.
Sorry, I did a grep through d-i source and that was as close as
I could get. Anyway, base-config version is 2.29.
--
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-19 15:49]:
> > > In this case, we should add a finish.d script which check that there's
> > > no separate /boot.
JFTR, the delo bootloader on mipsel also won't work with separate boot.
> > Where? In partconf?
>
> Oh fuck, tru
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 255103 prebaseconfig
Bug#255103: partconf: failed to create mount points
Bug reassigned from package `base-config' to `prebaseconfig'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
Package: os-prober
Version: daily, sid_d-i
Severity: normal
I just downloaded and tested the netinstall image for i386 from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/
and installed Debian.
I found a problem when d-i proposed to install GRUB into the MBR since
no other operating system
I just downloaded and tested the netinstall image for i386 from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/
and installed Debian.
In any field, I did type '/' and any other "normal" characters without
problem, while, if I use 'ò' or other "strange" chars then the input is
blocked and yo
reassign 255103 prebaseconfig
thanks
* martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-19 16:24]:
> > It's certainly not partconf which does this; I'm not 100% sure,
> > but I think it might be base-config.
>
> Sorry, I did a grep through d-i source and that was as close as
> I could get. Anyway, ba
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2004 16:30:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#246757: Is this fixed?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well, the firmware has no problem with booting from arbitrary
>> partitions, so a separate /boot makes little sense, and arcboot
>> doesn't support it. This should be documented better.
>
> Does arcboot not support it, or arcboot-installer?
arcboot n
Package: netcfg
Version: 20040618
Severity: normal
If I install on a system without a network card, it obviously fails
to detect one, then prompts me to insert drivers manually. If
I select 'none of the above' then I am told I can load from floppy.
If I say no, then I am back to the manual selecti
[ Copying d-boot as well, we could do with some discussion here. ]
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 11:45:37PM +0200, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
>Hi!
>
>We have a problem with the first cd as we don't even have any xserver there,
>so I'm trying to go through that and as I don't have much experience wi
To correct myself, it seems that the installer does allow
continuation without network configuration. So then it should be
easy to implement the two suggestions I gave...
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud
Package: installation-reports
Version: sid_d-i, 20040618
Severity: important
I just did a normal installation and rebooted the machine. Now I am
prompted by debconf for the base system configuration.
I did the complete installation using italian as language, so I see the
italian texts.
The templ
also sprach Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.06.19.1643 +0200]:
> Did I say base-config? Hmm, I meant base-installer.
>
> But it seems it's prebaseconfig
prebaseconfig creates
/media/cdrom -> /media/cdrom0
which exists.
But the directories
/media/cdrom[01]
are missing.
So may
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 02:16:40PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Patrick Caulfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-19 14:14]:
> > Allowable characters are: alphanumerics and . _ - +
>
> What about stuff like umlauts? (e.g. ä) [sorry, cannot test right
> now]
>
Ah, well, that depends on the cu
Package: ddetect
Version: 20040618
Severity: normal
I enabled two of the VMware network adapters (pcnet32). However, in
this situation, the pcnet32 adapter fails to load and the installer
can't detect a single one. modprobing on tty2 fails with "No such
device", so I guess the issue is in the driv
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 14:28:30 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>* Herbert Kaminski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-18 18:42]:
>> Kernel 2.6.6 was selected, but 2.4.25 was installed, so in stage 2
>> no module was found, networking failed, installation could not
>> finish.
>
>This *might* be because 2.6.
* Dan C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-10 15:48]:
> That's it. I don't know why I didn't catch this myself and (properly)
> report the error, but df /target returns:
> Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1157076776 36284 149061412
> 0% /target
>
colo-installer_0.08_mipsel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
colo-installer_0.08.dsc
colo-installer_0.08.tar.gz
colo-installer_0.08_mipsel.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2004 18:44:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line retested with sid_d-i 20040616
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Accepted:
colo-installer_0.08.dsc
to pool/main/c/colo-installer/colo-installer_0.08.dsc
colo-installer_0.08.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/colo-installer/colo-installer_0.08.tar.gz
colo-installer_0.08_mipsel.udeb
to pool/main/c/colo-installer/colo-installer_0.08_mipsel.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTE
Christian Perrier wrote:
Currently unusable in cdebconf (seems to be a whiptail bug in Unicode
environments). Just try to enter any non ASCII character in a dialog
box..:-(
#251550
I can enter cyrillic characters (that are not ASCII) used in Ukrainian
in d-i. This looks more like problem with keym
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2004 18:55:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line vmware-internal
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
base-config_2.31_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-config_2.31.dsc
base-config_2.31.tar.gz
base-config_2.31_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2004 13:02:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#255105: fixed in base-config 2.31
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Accepted:
base-config_2.31.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.31.dsc
base-config_2.31.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.31.tar.gz
base-config_2.31_all.deb
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.31_all.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 250340 255105
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2004 19:13:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line new test did not show the problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Today's meeting:
http://people.debian.org/~madduck/d-i/debian-boot-meeting-200406191600.irclog.gz
Thanks to our fearless moderator bubulle!
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and
Package: installation-reports
Version: sid_d-i, 20040616
The CDROM is perfecly detected when d-i uses 2.4 kernel, but it isn't
detected when using linux 2.6. The procedure stops and ask for loading
modules from a floppy. The CDROM is connected to the SCSI controller.
This is the lspci output from
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2004 19:54:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#255134: debian-installer: cardmgr causes system lockup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 255185 + pending
Bug#255185: Please use hyphens rather than underscores in wireless-* options
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks homie
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 03:07:49AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Please try starting the installer with 'linux DEBCONF-PRIORITY=medium' or
> 'expert'.
Right, that (with the spelling correction you noted a little later)
gets it past this speedbump. I guess the rest of the default install
was so remin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 254036 + pending
Bug#254036: Errors in german debconf-interface-translation
Tags were: l10n
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Helge,
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 06:31:14PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> (..)
> translation. If you supply me with the po-file, I can go through it,
> else the following points need changing:
http://svn.debian.org/viewcvs/base-config/trunk/po/de.po
and
http://svn.debian.org/viewcvs/base-con
Package: base-installer
Version: 20060616
Severity: wishlist
The kernel selection should be improved. In the following, I am
assuming that the optimisation level can be autodetected. Using
uname(1) or /proc/cpuinfo, this should not be a problem. I suggest:
Standard mode:
- use the kernel-image
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 255211 -1
Bug#255211: netcfg: loops when no network hardware is present
Bug 255211 cloned as bug 255247.
> reassign -1 ethdetect
Bug#255247: netcfg: loops when no network hardware is present
Bug reassigned from package `netcfg' to `ethdetect'.
>
When the partitions have been set up, the installer proceeds to
install the base system. The default is to pull the required
packages from the installation medium. With physical installation
media, using the choose-mirror component and selecting a mirror
causes the installer to automatically use th
Package: base-installer
Version: 20040616
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice if base-installer could inquire about the kernel to
use before downloading and installing everything (packages + kernel)
in a row. Then I could take my dog out longer.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unst
Package: base-installer
Version: 20040616
Severity: normal
If the 2.6 kernel was used for installation, then the 2.4 kernel
should probably not be an option for the final system. Otherwise
it's possible that the user is left without a working system, if
hardware required a 2.6 kernel.
-- System I
Hello All,
the following udebs are currently in testing, but out of sync between
architectures, and should be resynced for the release candidate:
archdetect alpha 0.100; other 0.101
bogl-bterm-udeb i386, powerpc 0.1.18-1; other 0.1.17-1
cdebootstrap-udeb arm, sparc 0.2.
I have tried three times now with sid_d-i and it definitely works
for me. However, I am using the CD-ROM as install medium. Trying
with mirror download now...
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian deve
Package: base-installer
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
there is a message by Martin Michlmayr for bug #247819:
> Is there any way, to get the mdadm package to be installed together
> with
> the kernel / along with the base-install?
As a workaround, you can
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 10:14:03PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> - kbd-chooser: Remove for s390, drop s390 from Architecture: if it is
>still there.
> - netcfg: Likewise.
> - netcfg-dhcp: Likewise.
Right, someone have to kill elmo, it is reported long time ago.
Bastian
--
A prin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 250860 discover1-data
Bug#250860: installation-reports on SATA-SIS
Bug reassigned from package `linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6' to `discover1-data'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Test Candidate 1, downloaded 10 June 2004
uname -a: N/A
Date: 10 June 2004 8pm
Method: Installed from bootable CD made from iso
Machine: Old custom-built system
Processor: Cyrix 6x86 200+
Memory: 64 Mb
Root Device: Maxtor SATA 200Gb HD
R
Package: discover1-data
Version: 1.2004.02.08-7
I had someone report that d-i didn't autodetect his sata
controller but he was able to manually modprobe sata_sil and then
it worked for him.
Output of lspci -n:
:03:0b.0 Class 0180: 1095:3114 (rev 02)
I'm not really sure which version of disco
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
