On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 06:37:39AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> My current understanding is:
>
> -sid_d-i is built daily from the d-i packages uploaded to
> unstable. Non d-i packages are also the unstable versions
> -sarge_d-i is built daily (?) from the packages in testing (sarge)
>
> -da
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 250530 -1
Bug#250530: nl_NL install: accented characters not shown correctly
Bug 250530 cloned as bug 254505.
> reassign -1 iso-codes
Bug#254505: nl_NL install: accented characters not shown correctly
Bug reassigned from package `countrychooser'
clone 250530 -1
reassign -1 iso-codes
retitle -1 Reunion has wrong encoding in dutch translation
reassign 250530 countrychooser
retitle 250530 Wrong encoding for dutch translation
tags -1 pending
tags 250530 pending
thanks
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> tags 250530 + l10n
> thanks
>
>
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> It looks like we have to throw out tc1 as not good enough for release.
> The release critical problems include:
It seems to me that a kind of "formal" meeting on IRC would help all
of us in organising our work.
We maybe lack that kind of formal stuff (just
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 01:14:49PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Reset (zap) the PRAM. Turn the power off, then turn it on with the
> Command-Option-P-R keys (all of them) held down. Hold the keys
> down til it bongs a couple of times, then release and it should
> boot normally from floppy.
>
>
In http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/06/msg01180.html Baptiste
Carvello wrote:
> /etc/network/interfaces is empty
The same problem was reported in #243543 but was reported to have been
fixed already. Please check there to see if you think that the
circumstances are the same.
--
Thomas Hood
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 15-06-2004 02:30
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/tc1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux sarge 2.4.26-1-386
Date: 15-06-2004 03:00.00
Method: Network install from ftp.nl.debian.org
Machine: D
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 14:27:01 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#254555: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Hi,
At 15 Jun 04 07:31:49 GMT,
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> It seems to me that a kind of "formal" meeting on IRC would help all
> of us in organising our work.
>
> We maybe lack that kind of formal stuff (just an idea "en l'air").
>
> As Joey leaves on Thu
Christian Perrier wrote:
> 20040614 sid_d-i i386 netinst
>
> 1st stage is OK (choose french+Brazil)
>
> After reboot, it seems that termwrap fails:
>
>
> /bin/sh: line1: /dev/vc/1: No such file or directory
>
> And then init respawns base-config over and over
I broke this in my changes to
Bastian Blank wrote:
> Modified:
>trunk/packages/libdebian-installer/src/system/devfs.c
> Log:
> Joey Hess likes to cry about wasted space but do it also.
A better way to save space with libdi is to move functions like this one
that are only used by one program in all of d-i out of the library
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > /bin/sh: line1: /dev/vc/1: No such file or directory
> >
> > And then init respawns base-config over and over
>
> I broke this in my changes to mapdevfs, uploading a fix now.
Which should make it in today's build, fine. Thus I'll be able to test
th
Christian Perrier wrote:
> My current understanding is:
>
> -sid_d-i is built daily from the d-i packages uploaded to
> unstable. Non d-i packages are also the unstable versions
No, udebs are from unstable, but debs are from testing.
> -sarge_d-i is built daily (?) from the packages in testing (
Christian Perrier wrote:
> It seems to me that a kind of "formal" meeting on IRC would help all
> of us in organising our work.
>
> We maybe lack that kind of formal stuff (just an idea "en l'air").
I hope if it's a formal meeting that there are some known topics for us
to discuss. This could be
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:13:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line PCMCIA freezes install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Baptiste Carvello wrote:
> tc1: A few changes, but only to make it worse: after choosing "none of
> the above", I get a proposition to provide a driver floppy, and when I
> anser "no", I get cycled back to the previous question. The only way to
> get to the menu is pressing the ESC key.
Please
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I hope if it's a formal meeting that there are some known topics for us
> to discuss. This could be a good idea, at least it can't hurt to try it.
Basically, I think your "dropping tc1" mail could be a start. Just get
all the points one by one and assign o
Apal wrote:
> :00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 01)
> :00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #2) (rev 01)
> :00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #3) (rev 01)
>
> :00:1d.0 Class 0c03: 8086:2482 (rev 01)
> :
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 254448 d-i
Bug#254448: Debian Installer on IBM ThinkPad X23
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
> reassign 254448 discover1-data
Bug#254448: Debian Installer on IBM ThinkP
- Forwarded message from Apal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Apal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:05:01 +0200
To: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#254448: Debian Installer on IBM ThinkPad X23
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)
Joey Hess a écrit
libdebian-installer_0.29_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libdebian-installer_0.29.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.29.tar.gz
libdebian-installer4_0.29_i386.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.29_i386.deb
libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.29_i386.udeb
libdebian-instal
libdebian-installer_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libdebian-installer_0.26.1.really.0.22.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.26.1.really.0.22.tar.gz
libdebian-installer4_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.26.1.really.0.22_
Accepted:
libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.29_i386.udeb
to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.29_i386.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.29_i386.deb
to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.29_i386.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.29_i3
Accepted:
libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.deb
to
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.
> Hmm. I don't really see what's meant by "various daily builds of
> beta4". Beta4 is now over and not rebuilt.
> Still we have these imprecisions around all build versions.
>
Sorry for not being exact enough, i meant beta 4 of the debian
installer and various daily builds that came afterwards.
>
>
Joey Hess a écrit :
Apal wrote:
:00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 01)
:00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #2) (rev 01)
:00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #3) (rev 01)
:00:1d.0 Class 0c03:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 08:40:06PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > I hope if it's a formal meeting that there are some known topics for us
> > to discuss. This could be a good idea, at least it can't hurt to try it.
>
> Basically, I think your "dropp
>> Oh? So you didn't have the DHCP problem when you used tc1?
> No, it worked just fine now.
Seems I said to early that it is working fine now. With the daily
build from June 14th that I downloaded and tested today, the issue is
there again (for the REM56G-100). I checked syslog and the same
mes
Il Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 08:40:06PM +0200, Christian Perrier ha scritto:
[...]
> I currently propose Saturday June 19th, 16:00 UTC as a first
> possibility. #debian-boot channel, of course.
>
>
> Folks, please confirm wheher you can attend this meeting.
> (Joey already counted as not attending)
>
Alessandro Polverini wrote:
> reading the changelog of d-i I saw you switched back to the old logo
> because the current one confused some users (!?).
It's hard to belive, isn't it? It seems that more than one user saw the
white lines dividing the top and bottom of the logo, and the cut in half
"D
Hi again,
After Joey Hess ask me to load the usb-uhci module, i tried to detect
the usb cdrom drive again, and it works !
Perhaps the installator should try to load these 3 modules before
detecting cd :)
Thanks for your support !
I will send an installation reports again after this try. Bye !
(n
I tried again :
Only the normal install (kernel 2.4) is able to load the usb-uhci
module, to detect my drive.
The linux26 install can't load this module. My drive is not recognized.
Is it possible to fix the linux26 install ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 08:40:06PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I currently propose Saturday June 19th, 16:00 UTC as a first
> possibility. #debian-boot channel, of course.
>
>
>
> Folks, please confirm wheher you can attend this meeting.
> (Joey already counted as not attending)
I can't m
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#253361: fixed in netcfg 0.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#253099: fixed in netcfg 0.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Hi Folks,
I'm new to Debian.
Just tried the sarge netinst.iso and am unable to get DHCP working during
install. I skipped the network setup and installed the base system. I
suppose I can try to setup DHCP again. I know my Internet is correct as I
have had SuSE detect it and XP.
.
(my system no
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#248147: fixed in netcfg 0.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#247734: fixed in netcfg 0.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#253086: fixed in netcfg 0.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
netcfg_0.69_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_0.69.dsc
netcfg_0.69.tar.gz
netcfg_0.69_i386.udeb
netcfg-dhcp_0.69_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.69_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_0.69_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.69_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.69_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.69_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.69.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.69.dsc
netcfg_0.69.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.69.tar.gz
netcfg_0.6
* Ganesh Sittampalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-14 17:34]:
> At one point the installer mentioned PCMCIA (I think in the context of
> removing PCMCIA support, but I forget). At no point did it mention that
> you are unlikely to need it if you don't have a laptop (or that you are
> very likely to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 254411 -1 -2
Bug#254411: (no subject)
Bug 254411 cloned as bugs 254629-254630.
> reassign -1 lvmcfg
Bug#254629: (no subject)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `lvmcfg'.
> reassign -2 lvmcfg
Bug#254630: (no subject)
Bug reassi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 254411 newt
Bug#254411: (no subject)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `newt'.
> retitle 254411 Passwords don't result in * or so echoed
Bug#254411: (no subject)
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pleas
reassign 254411 newt
retitle 254411 Passwords don't result in * or so echoed
thanks
* Ganesh Sittampalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-14 17:34]:
> When entering passwords to set up accounts, you don't get *s as you
> type. This is actually fairly standard for Linux, of course, but
> users tend to
clone 254411 -1 -2
reassign -1 lvmcfg
reassign -2 lvmcfg
retitle -1 doesn't tell how to switch to the third console
retitle -2 doesn't give good error when bogus LV name is used
severity -1 minor
severity -2 minor
thanks
* Ganesh Sittampalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-14 17:34]:
> Something (pro
Hi,
I also have interest to participate on meeting (specially about the install manual
translation topic). I agreed
with being on Saturday - 19 June - if possible (for most people is the best time to
participate, because is a
non work hour).
> Folks, please confirm wheher you can attend this m
Package: debian-installer
Version: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/2004-06-14/floppy/
After booting and displaying the low memory warning, d-i loops
forever displaying the following two lines:
Unknown localized field:
Description-C.UTF-8:
I used the boot.img and root.img floppy imag
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: sarge beta4
uname -a: Linux pluto 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i486 GNU/Linux
Date: 14 Jun 2004 20:00
Method: floppy boot (boot.img, root.img, cd-drivers.img, net-drivers.img)
then network install from ftp.us.debian.or
Tried a woody install tiny iso and DHCP setup worked.
> Hi Folks,
> I'm new to Debian.
>
> Just tried the sarge netinst.iso and am unable to get DHCP working during
> install. I skipped the network setup and installed the base system. I
> suppose I can try to setup DHCP again. I know my Internet i
无停游泳场馆售票管理系统v2.0
特点及功能：操作简单，无须培训，即时会用。
1.便捷的售票方式,操作简单。
2.打印游泳票据。
3.完备会员卡设置。(月卡,次卡)功能齐全。
4.培训班日程设置，查询，教练信息，学员信息查询方便。
5.泳具出售管理，大型泳具出租管理。
6.救生员管理，查询，当班日程。
7.功能齐全的报表功能。
8.另外，
Apal wrote:
> I tried again :
> Only the normal install (kernel 2.4) is able to load the usb-uhci
> module, to detect my drive.
> The linux26 install can't load this module. My drive is not recognized.
> Is it possible to fix the linux26 install ?
The module for the 2.6 kernel is called uhci-hcd.
Matt Kraai wrote:
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/2004-06-14/floppy/
>
> After booting and displaying the low memory warning, d-i loops
> forever displaying the following two lines:
>
> Unknown localized field:
> Description-C.UTF-8:
>
> I used
usb-discover_0.17_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
usb-discover_0.17.dsc
usb-discover_0.17.tar.gz
usb-discover_0.17_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Accepted:
usb-discover_0.17.dsc
to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_0.17.dsc
usb-discover_0.17.tar.gz
to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_0.17.tar.gz
usb-discover_0.17_all.udeb
to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_0.17_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for yo
usb-discover_0.17_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
usb-discover_0.17.dsc
usb-discover_0.17.tar.gz
usb-discover_0.17_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Rejected: usb-discover_0.17_i386.changes: a file with this name already exists in the
Accepted directory.
Rejected: usb-discover_0.17.dsc file already exists in the Accepted directory.
Rejected: usb-discover_0.17_all.udeb file already exists in the Accepted directory.
Rejected: usb-discover_0.17.
Hi all,
The mailing list web page says i should introduce myself. So here goes:
Name: Paul Gear
Age:32 (and feeling every minute of it)
Location:
Brisbane, Australia
Why i am here:
Trying to convert from Red Hat/Fedora to sarge
Using Linux since:
kernel 0.97
Di
netcfg_0.70_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_0.70.dsc
netcfg_0.70.tar.gz
netcfg_0.70_i386.udeb
netcfg-dhcp_0.70_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.70_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_0.70_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.70_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.70_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.70_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.70.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.70.dsc
netcfg_0.70.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.70.tar.gz
netcfg_0.7
Quoting Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I can't make that, I'm afraid. Of your other slots, 23:00 UTC on
> Saturday is fine, and 16:00 UTC works practically every day apart from
> this Wednesday and Saturday.
Hmm, you were among my key people...:-). If Steve isn't available,
we'll either can
First
just for information but it's not the subject here. I will investigate
this later.
Christian I cannot reproduce the bug on sid_d-i (14 Jun) because this
one don't work on my system
I get /bin/sh:line 1:/dev/vc/1:No such file or directory (ten time)
and INIT: Id "1" respawning too fast:
Because anonymous SVN checkout is currently broken for d-i, the 1st
stages statistics are also broken. I'll try to keep you posted with
possible changes.
Non anonymous checkout is possible, however, so you can still commit
your changes.
Can someone fix the anonymous checkout on the SVN repository
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Could you please exactly explain what is wrong?
>
> OK/not OK is a bit short. What can you do and what cannot you do?
Olivier gave me details in private. Basically this is an issue on
sarge_d-i and still the same bug. This is definitely *not* an
> To be hundred percent sure I just downloaded again a daily build of
> the debian-installer for i386 here:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040614/.
> This version has still the issue.
OK. This is a sarge_d-i build, IIRC. Thus d-i packages are from
testing (and non d-
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 08:40:06PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I currently propose Saturday June 19th, 16:00 UTC as a first
> possibility.?#debian-boot channel, of course.
>
>
>
> Folks, please confirm wheher you can attend this meeting.
> (Joey already counted as not attending)
>
> 1) Ch
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 01:03:32PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> It sounds like the new libd-i package resolver works for i386. That's a
> nice change.
The next pending change will break cdrom installs, because debian-cd
discards libdebconfclient-udeb and anna can't resolve the virtual
dependency with
67 matches
Mail list logo
