Bug#253470: di-rep: i386 netboot 20040607

On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 04:35:12PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote: > Hola Geert Stappers! > > > Debian-installer-version: > > http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/20040607/netboot/ > > a network boot using http://etherboot.org for the boot software at client side. > > Used unstable from h

Re: New amd64 Debian-installer cdrom iso image

On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 08:01:32AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Hi, > > I have updated the sid-amd64-cdrom.iso on alioth to the latest D-I > images, debs and udebs from alioth including a fixed sid console-data. That console-data fix, is that related to #253470 where an undocumented debcon

Processed: Re: Bug#253470: triage

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 253470 console-data Bug#253470: di-rep: i386 netboot 20040607 Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `console-data'. > retitle 253470 console-data: uses undocumented debconf "feature" Bug#253470: di-rep: i386 netboot 20040607 Ch

Bug#253470: triage

reassign 253470 console-data retitle 253470 console-data: uses undocumented debconf "feature" thanks Hope This Helps On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 08:11:33PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Geert Stappers wrote: > > I had a closer look at /var/log/messages and found: > > > > Setting up console-data (2002.12

kernel oops decoder

On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 04:42:36PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Geert Stappers wrote: > > Two attempts with 20040608 images failed in kernels oopses. > > > > Attempts with 20040607 had also OOPSES at several places, > > but did bring me to debian base system install. > > Kernel oopses are of course

Re: New amd64 Debian-installer cdrom iso image

Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Quoting Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >> Hi, >> >> I have updated the sid-amd64-cdrom.iso on alioth to the latest D-I >> images, debs and udebs from alioth including a fixed sid console-data. > > I suppose that testing it on an already i

Bug#253536: debian-installer: Amd64 kernel updates

Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Package: debian-installer >> Version: 20040528 >> Severity: important >> Tags: patch >> Justification: fails to build from source > > Please stop using important as a severity for amd64 packages until amd64 > is an official arc

Bug#253536: debian-installer: Amd64 kernel updates

On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 09:43:05AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> Package: debian-installer > >> Version: 20040528 > >> Severity: important > >> Tags: patch > >> Justification: fails to build from source > > > > Please

Re: New amd64 Debian-installer cdrom iso image

On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 08:01:32AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > The init.d script of discover1 tries to rm /media/cdrom0/* which of > course if read-only and fails (between installing base and grub). > > After adding an exit 0 at the top of the script I was able to install > grub and reboo

Bug#249346: discover1: Mouse module isn't loaded when using 2.6 kernel

On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 11:24:24PM +0300, Egle Pusaite wrote: > Package: discover1 > Version: 1.5-9 > Severity: normal > > > After the installation of 2.6 kernel the mouse stopped working. > I must manually run: modprobe mousedev > > I believe, it would be wise if the discover program loaded the

Bug#236423: Numerous error messages at boot

On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 12:48:37AM -0500, Joe Hester wrote: > Numerous error messages at boot: > JEDEC: Found no ICH2 rom device at location zero > > Stopped the error messages by adding a line to > /etc/discover-modprobe.conf > > skip ="ich2rom" The only PCI ID that lists this kernel module is 8

Re: New amd64 Debian-installer cdrom iso image

[Gaudenz Steinlin] > I do not really understand your problem. Why is /media/cdrom0 read-only? > Is this problem specific to amd64 or general? Does it only occur if you > install sid or is it also in sarge? > Can you please file a bug report if this is really a problem with > discover1. It is proba

HP Proliant ML350 G3 - problems with HP Smart Array 641 Controller

Hi! I've bought an HP Proliant ML350 G3. On this computer there is a harddisk controller (HP Smart Array 641 Controller) that doesn't work with any linuxdistribution out of the box (the installation programs can't locate the SCSI disks). HP has drivers for Red Hat 8 (and a few other distributions)

Bug#242959: uhci + ehci

On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 12:47:39AM -0700, Karl Hegbloom wrote: > I think it should load both. UHCI is for USB 1, and EHCI is for USB 2. In your bugreport you indicated that a module named usb-ehci should be loaded. But there is no such module in the debian kernel packages. The current version of d

Bug#238648: d-i, sata, netinst.iso 30.05.2004

On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 05:02:45PM +0200, Markus Haiml wrote: > > > --On Montag, 31. Mai 2004 15:42 -0300 Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >Can you boot debian-installer and manually load the module with: > > > > modprobe sata_promise > > > >Does debian-installer then see your

Re: New amd64 Debian-installer cdrom iso image

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) writes: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 08:01:32AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have updated the sid-amd64-cdrom.iso on alioth to the latest D-I >> images, debs and udebs from alioth including a fixed sid console-data. > That console-data fix, is

Re: New amd64 Debian-installer cdrom iso image

Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [Gaudenz Steinlin] >> I do not really understand your problem. Why is /media/cdrom0 read-only? >> Is this problem specific to amd64 or general? Does it only occur if you >> install sid or is it also in sarge? >> Can you please file a bug report if

(forw) ne reconnait pas le disque dur

OK, this is in french and I currently don't have time for translating carefully. I asked Sophie to report here in English possibly with needed details (is this with Debian Installer? If so, which image exactly? Which kind of PowerMac?). She will maybe report in French...and then I'll translate. Gi

egb4car.com Ihre Automobilplattform in Europa

Title: egb4car.com - Ihre Automobilplattform in Europa Herzlich willkommen Sie wollen Ihr Auto, Motorrad, Bus, Wohnmobil, Transporter, Bau- oder Landwirtschaftmaschine in ganz Europa kaufen oder verkaufen? West go to East ... East go to West ... Wir sind für Sie da www.egb4car.com - ko

Re: Re: Installer fails on initrd-tools

On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 12:52:39PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Dan C wrote: > > + rootpart_devfs=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1156681320 > > It seems that base-installer finds the root partition by the rather > broken method of doing a "df /target". I assume that you have a large > root part

Bug#242228: marked as done (installation-reports: failed: cannot repartition hard drive)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:39:19 +0300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Cannot reproduce has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#242959: uhci + ehci

On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 11:50:04AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 12:47:39AM -0700, Karl Hegbloom wrote: > > I think it should load both. UHCI is for USB 1, and EHCI is for USB 2. > > In your bugreport you indicated that a module named usb-ehci should be > loaded. But th

Re: (forw) ne reconnait pas le disque dur

On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 03:23:06PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > OK, this is in french and I currently don't have time for translating > carefully. I asked Sophie to report here in English possibly with > needed details (is this with Debian Installer? If so, which image > exactly? Which kind of

Bug#252930: Installation-Reports: Beta 4 as a VMware Guest

Joey Hess wrote: [snip] > Looking at it again, the root cause seems to be that a root login shell > does not get the sbin directories in the PATH. The PATH is > "/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games". That seems broken > to me, shouldn't root have those directories in its path when

Bug#238648: d-i, sata, netinst.iso 30.05.2004

--On Donnerstag, 10. Juni 2004 11:59 +0200 Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 05:02:45PM +0200, Markus Haiml wrote: --On Montag, 31. Mai 2004 15:42 -0300 Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you boot debian-installer and manually load the module with

Bug#228269: marked as done (installation-report: beta2 test on i386 : doesn't boot at all)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Jun 2004 17:02:03 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line installation-report: beta2 test on i386 : doesn't boot at all has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Re: state of the test candidate

At 9 Jun 04 16:29:36 GMT, Joey Hess wrote: > Kenshi Muto wrote: > > My known issue: > > > > - - linux26 + i386 + vga16fb + some languages (Chinese, Japanese, > > Korean, Greek, Bulgarian) goes serious screen lockup on 2nd stage. > > This is not d-i's fault, but is kernel 2.6.6 problem. (Bug#25

Re: (forw) ne reconnait pas le disque dur

Quoting Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > There's no "install24" in d-i, indeed. I suspect she's talking about > 3.0r2. Hmmm, you're certainly right. So let's convince her to test d-i, now..:-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

Bug#253640: USB drivers not loaded with 2.6 on powerpc

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: debian-installer Severity: important The usb driver doesn't seem to be loaded on my powermac when I boot with the 2.6 kernel(sid daily-build). It's realy annoying with an usb keyboard... Laurent Bigonville -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Versio

initrd.list output from build process

The following patch causes the d-i build process to output an initrd.list file beside each initrd listing the packages it contains and the versions of each package. What do people think - should I commit this? I think it would be very useful for: * figuring out what versions of everything went i

Bug#253645: modconf does not write options into /etc/modules

Package: modconf Version: 0.2.45.1 Hi, i tried around with jack o'quins realtime lsm for 2.6.x kernels and i found something weird.. when i pass the options any=1 allcaps=1 via the modconf program these options do get written into /etc/modutils/realtime, but not into /etc/modules. Weird enoug

Install via PPPoE

I haven't been able to find any info on how to install Sarge through the Internet using PPPoE to connect. Is this possible yet? If so how? I haven't been able to test the latest test candidate because Virtual PC can't initialize the virtual switch. Any pointers would be much appreciated. Or is

Review of arcboot-installer template wanted

Hi, I'm planning to include a patch to arcboot-installer, for #241178, which posts a reminder note about prom variables. (Assuming joeyh says ok). Before I go stressing out all the translators, can people please review the English version below? Template: arcboot/prom_variables Type: note Descr

Processed: tags

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 244978 moreinfo Bug#244978: Should apt-install usbutils if USB is found Tags were: d-i Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Deb

Need help..here for you-House dollars

How are you TOday HERE IS THE LO.AN FOR YOU I can strongly recommend a new company for your new HO.ME Dollars http://www.reficom.com/b1a/index.php NOW WE WILL SHOW YOU THE VA.LUE OF WHAT WE CAN DO FOR YOU THANK-YOU FOR YOUR TIME

Bug#253640: USB drivers not loaded with 2.6 on powerpc

On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 05:23:41PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > Package: debian-installer > Severity: important > > The usb driver doesn't seem to be loaded on my powermac when I boot > with the 2.6 kernel(sid daily-build). > It's realy annoying with an usb keyboard... Exactly which URL di

Bug#244978: is usbutils ever needed?

Hi, I'm working on Debian bug #244978, which asks if usbutils is needed for anything, or will hotplug suffice. In /etc/hotplug/hotplug.functions, there is a note: " usbmodules used for (a) multi-interface devices, (b) coldplug" Do you know if usbutils is needed for multi-interface devices, or w

Bug#244886: kbd-chooser: can't select keymap on sparc64 netboot 20040411 image

Hi, Can you please confirm whether or not you still see this problem? I do not have access to a sparc machine and cannot debug this without help Regards Alastair -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Help! Debian-Installer Dies with various umount errors

I have tried the Beta 4 Sarge installer, Beta 4 Net Installer, and Testing Candidate 1 Net Install (all for i386) and my installs always die at Installing the Base System. (I always do a clean install, letting the installer use the entire disk). Looking in the error logs, I see: umount: /target

Bug#252930: Installation-Reports: Beta 4 as a VMware Guest

Joey Hess wrote: > Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > ~/.profile gets ignored, because $HOME is set to / instead of /root, > > so it uses only the definitions in /etc/profile. (This also leaves > > a .bash_history file in /.) > > I thought that might be it too, but I cannot reproduce it in a sarge > chroot

Bug#252930: Installation-Reports: Beta 4 as a VMware Guest

Hmm, but setting HOME in base-config does fix it. Go figure. Perhaps whatever bash used to get root's home in my chroot is not present during a base-config run. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#253536: debian-installer: Amd64 kernel updates

Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> Package: debian-installer > >> Version: 20040528 > >> Severity: important > >> Tags: patch > >> Justification: fails to build from source > > > > Please stop using important as a severity for

Bug#252930: Installation-Reports: Beta 4 as a VMware Guest

Thiemo Seufer wrote: > ~/.profile gets ignored, because $HOME is set to / instead of /root, > so it uses only the definitions in /etc/profile. (This also leaves > a .bash_history file in /.) I thought that might be it too, but I cannot reproduce it in a sarge chroot with HOME unset. I think that b

Bug#252930: Installation-Reports: Beta 4 as a VMware Guest

Thiemo Seufer wrote: > ~/.profile gets ignored, because $HOME is set to / instead of /root, > so it uses only the definitions in /etc/profile. (This also leaves > a .bash_history file in /.) Ooh, now I get it, HOME is /. Why? Anyway, thanks for the analysis, and fixed. -- see shy jo signature.

Re: initrd.list output from build process

Colin Watson wrote: [snip] > @@ -572,8 +575,9 @@ > # Create the images for dest/. Those are the targets called from config. > # > # Create a compressed image of the root filesystem by way of genext2fs. > -$(INITRD): $(TEMP_INITRD) > +$(INITRD): $(TEMP_INITRD) $(TEMP_INITRD_LIST) > install

Re: New amd64 Debian-installer cdrom iso image

Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > I have updated the sid-amd64-cdrom.iso on alioth to the latest D-I > images, debs and udebs from alioth including a fixed sid console-data. > > I managed to install and boot a debian system from the cdrom with one > problem: > > The init.d script of discover1 tries t

Bug#253640: USB drivers not loaded with 2.6 on powerpc

Le 10 juin 2004, à 17:58, Colin Watson a écrit : Exactly which URL did you use to download this image? I added input-modules to the initrd some days ago ... there: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/powerpc/current/ sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso PGP.sig Description: =?ISO-8859-1?

Re: New amd64 Debian-installer cdrom iso image

On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 12:47:42PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > The image is available from: (ETA 45m) > > http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/sid-amd64-cdrom.iso > > I don't see a businesscard CD st that link, just a netinst. Do you plan > to make other images bseides CDs availabl

Bug#253683: TC1

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: TC1, downloaded from and shows version 20040528 on the help page. uname -a: n/a Date: 2004 Jun 10 Method: Booted from CD iso Machine: FIC VA503+ mo

Re: kernel oops decoder

Geert Stappers wrote: > On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 04:42:36PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > Geert Stappers wrote: > > > Two attempts with 20040608 images failed in kernels oopses. > > > > > > Attempts with 20040607 had also OOPSES at several places, > > > but did bring me to debian base system install.

Bug#253211: Fix and some thoughts [Was: Bug#253211: Problems with the screen display in second stage]

Christian Perrier wrote: > (1) means reverting Kenshi Muto changes to termwrap. These were needed > by different console font handling in 2.6 and 2.4 which lead to broken > dialog boxes in 2.6 installs (boxes bordered with "strange" > characters). This has a drawback-->we need termwrap to behave >

Bug#253687: installation-reports

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: downloaded June 3, 2004 from http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/tc1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: Linux galdo 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: June 4, 2004, 8 am to 10 am (local tim

Re: New amd64 Debian-installer cdrom iso image

Kurt Roeckx wrote: > The d-i images I build are available at: > http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-installer/current/images/ > > Those are the "real" d-i images as build by the debian-installer > package. If you would build those using the installer/build/daily-build script, then I coul

Bug#244978: is usbutils ever needed?

On Thursday 10 June 2004 17:51, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > Do you know if usbutils is needed for multi-interface > devices, or will hotplug suffice? /etc/hotplug/usb.rc contains the following code LISTER=`which usbmodules` if [ "$LISTER" = "" -o ! -f /proc/bus/usb/devices ]; then echo "*

Re: Install via PPPoE

Arthur Wiebe wrote: > I haven't been able to find any info on how to install Sarge through the > Internet using PPPoE to connect. Is this possible yet? If so how? I > haven't been able to test the latest test candidate because Virtual PC > can't initialize the virtual switch. > Any pointers woul

Re: Help! Debian-Installer Dies with various umount errors

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have tried the Beta 4 Sarge installer, Beta 4 Net Installer, and > Testing Candidate 1 Net Install (all for i386) and my installs always > die at Installing the Base System. (I always do a clean install, letting > the installer use the entire disk). > > Looking in t

Processed: netcfg

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 253683 netcfg Bug#253683: TC1 Bug reassigned from package `ethdetect' to `netcfg'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --

Processed: Re: Bug#253575: Default partitioning doesn't create a space for ELILO

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 253575 d-i Bug#253575: Default partitioning doesn't create a space for ELILO There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i > clone 253575 -1 Bug#253575: Default partitioning doesn't create a space for ELILO Bug 253575 cloned as bug 253696. > clone 25357

Processed: reassign 253683 to ethdetect

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 253683 ethdetect Bug#253683: TC1 Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `ethdetect'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you n

Processing of base-config_2.27_i386.changes

base-config_2.27_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: base-config_2.27.dsc base-config_2.27.tar.gz base-config_2.27_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Bug#253683: TC1

* Don Jackson (AE5K) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-10 12:35]: > Comments/Problems: Does not recognize my NIC which is a > National/Anthem NE2000 compatible and uses ne.o driver. Gave it the > ne driver selection and IRQ=3 IO=0x340 params which work in existing > Woody 2.2.20 version. Comes back

Bug#253575: Default partitioning doesn't create a space for ELILO

tag 253575 d-i clone 253575 -1 clone 253575 -2 reassign -1 kernel-image-2.6.4-ia64 retitle -1 does not depend on module-init-tools reassign -2 partman-auto retitle -2 needs ia64 specific recipe for elilo fat16 partition reassign 253575 netcfg retitle 253575 does not say how to use different port on

Bug#253683: TC1

Don Jackson (AE5K) wrote: > Output of lspci: n/a Why did you not provide this information? Unless your NIC is not a PCI device, it's very important information we need to solve your problem. > Comments/Problems: Does not recognize my NIC which is a > National/Anthem NE2000 compatible and uses ne

Bug#244978: is usbutils ever needed?

Alastair McKinstry wrote: > I'm working on Debian bug #244978, which asks if usbutils > is needed for anything, or will hotplug suffice. > > In /etc/hotplug/hotplug.functions, there is a note: > " usbmodules used for (a) multi-interface devices, (b) coldplug" > > Do you know if usbutils is needed

Re: Help! Debian-Installer Dies with various umount errors

Ralph Crongeyer wrote: > I had simalar issues on one machine. It looks like the installer can't > read from the disk at some point. Anyway try a different/newer CDROM > drive. It worked for me. Actually, since [EMAIL PROTECTED] did not include any real error messages in his report, there is no w

Bug#253211: marked as done (No line box drawing characters in 2.4 installs for Latin languages)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Jun 2004 14:32:02 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#253211: fixed in base-config 2.27 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Re: Help! Debian-Installer Dies with various umount errors

I had simalar issues on one machine. It looks like the installer can't read from the disk at some point. Anyway try a different/newer CDROM drive. It worked for me. Ralph Joey Hess wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have tried the Beta 4 Sarge installer, Beta 4 Net Installer, and

base-config_2.27_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: base-config_2.27.dsc to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.27.dsc base-config_2.27.tar.gz to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.27.tar.gz base-config_2.27_all.deb to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.27_all.deb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 252930 253211

Bug#252930: marked as done (still PATH problems in shell menu item)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Jun 2004 14:32:02 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#252930: fixed in base-config 2.27 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Re: New amd64 Debian-installer cdrom iso image

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 is there any chance that amd64 is going to get a build/install option for sarge any time soon? - -ben "Unix is user friendly, Its just picky about its friends." On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Hi, > > I have updated the sid-amd6

Bug#253709: (no subject)

Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: Used the http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/tc1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso image downloaded at 9th June 2004. uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 unknown Date: 9th

Re: initrd.list output from build process

On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 06:25:18PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Colin Watson wrote: > > @@ -572,8 +575,9 @@ > > # Create the images for dest/. Those are the targets called from config. > > # > > # Create a compressed image of the root filesystem by way of genext2fs. > > -$(INITRD): $(TEMP_INITR

Re: New amd64 Debian-installer cdrom iso image

On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 02:15:33PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > If you would build those using the installer/build/daily-build script, > then I could add them to the build tracking page > (http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/build-logs.html). It's now available from: http://debian-amd64.alioth.deb

Re: Re: Installer fails on initrd-tools

On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 12:52 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Dan C wrote: > > + rootpart_devfs=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1156681320 > It seems that base-installer finds the root partition by the rather > broken method of doing a "df /target". I assume that you have a large > root partition, of

Re: Help! Debian-Installer Dies with various umount errors

On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 12:34 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have tried the Beta 4 Sarge installer, Beta 4 Net Installer, and > Testing Candidate 1 Net Install (all for i386) and my installs always > die at Installing the Base System. (I always do a clean install, letting > the installer use

Bug#253418: Installation report

* Gabriel Kerneis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-09 12:51]: > I got an error message when i tried to use LVM at the partition step. It > seemed to be impossible for the partitions wasn't created or something > like that but he asked just before whether i wanted to create the > partitions... Anyway

Bug#253312: Installation failure for XFS over LVM on Test1 Sarge Netinstall CD

* Samuel P Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-08 11:11]: > Root Size/partition table: LVM (see comments below for config) > Basic CD Netinst (no boot options). > Configured 2 x 120GB HD's the same. > Configured the whole disk for LVM. > Created 1 VG (rootvg). > Created 3 LV's: boot (50M), root (10

Re: Install via PPPoE

Joey Hess wrote: Arthur Wiebe wrote: I haven't been able to find any info on how to install Sarge through the Internet using PPPoE to connect. Is this possible yet? If so how? I haven't been able to test the latest test candidate because Virtual PC can't initialize the virtual switch. Any poi

Jochen Eversmeier ist außer Haus.

Ich werde ab 08.06.2004 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 21.06.2004. Bitte wenden Sie sich in meiner Abwesenheit in dringenden Fällen an unsere Zentrale unter Telefon 0 40/3 80 80-3 33.

Bug#252164: Package: installation-reports

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-02 22:21]: > OK, I went back through the steps. Indeed I did all of 1 through 5 in > the correct order. I can't for the life of me figure out 6. In the main > menu of Partition Disks, I can see all partitions including the two > lvm partitions,

Re: Install via PPPoE

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I haven't been able to find any info on how to install Sarge through the >> Internet using PPPoE to connect. Is this possible yet? If so how? I >> haven't been able to test the latest test candidate because Virtual PC >> can't initialize the virtual switch. >> Any po

Bug#253724: daily-20040515: some suggestions and typos

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 20040515 daily build for i386 uname -a: Linux nb-Spencer 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 2004/05/17, ~1500h ADT. Method: booted netinst CD (2.4 kernel) Machine: P4 desktop, no

Re: Install via PPPoE

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 10 June 2004 22:10, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Only ppp-udeb and the ppp kernel modules udeb are needed for a PPPoE > install, but I do not know which images provide them. The TC1 i386 netinst iso contains: ./pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386/pp

Re: Install via PPPoE

Frans Pop wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 10 June 2004 22:10, Marco d'Itri wrote: Only ppp-udeb and the ppp kernel modules udeb are needed for a PPPoE install, but I do not know which images provide them. The TC1 i386 netinst iso contains: ./pool/main/l/linu

Bug#253730: libdb2 missing from 6/9/2004 daily build

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: Daily Build 6/9/2004 http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040609/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: Linux nitrogen 2.4.26-1-686-smp #1 SMP Sat May 1 19:17:11 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 6/9/2004 Method: Booted off CD-

Processing of base-installer_0.083_i386.changes

base-installer_0.083_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: base-installer_0.083.dsc base-installer_0.083.tar.gz base-installer_0.083_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsu

Bug#253731: test-candidate-1: linux26: some cosmetic and usability problems

Package: installation-reports Severity: minor INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: test candidate 1 uname -a: machine isn't booted up right now, but it's running 2.6.6-k7 from sarge Date: 2004/6/5? +/- a couple days Method: booted netinst CD, net install from an up-to-date local mirror. Mac

base-installer_0.083_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: base-installer_0.083.dsc to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.083.dsc base-installer_0.083.tar.gz to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.083.tar.gz base-installer_0.083_i386.udeb to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.083_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PRO

Bug#253736: discover1: Tries to remove /media/cdrom0 which fails in d-i - cd is mounted there

Package: discover1 Version: 1.5-12 Severity: important Hi discover1 has this change in its changelog for 1.5-10: - Change default CD-ROM mountpoint base to /media (Closes: #245898) Since then it breaks d-i cdroms, because they are mounted in /media and discover tries to remove the directories

Bug#253730: libdb2 missing from 6/9/2004 daily build

Eric Harvieux wrote: > http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040609/sarge-i386-netinst.iso Please try again with today's build, which should fix this. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: kernel oops decoder

Joey Hess wrote: [snip] > > Please tell me and the other lurkers here more > > how to decode kernel oopses in debian-installer. > > > > For what I see, is that the package ksymoops is needed at the target system. > > Well we use the stock debian i386 kernel, so you just get another system > with

Bug#253742: SparcStation2 netboot problems

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-sparc/current/images/sparc32/netboot/boot.img (beta4) uname -a: Linux limey 2.2.19 #1 Mon Apr 2 13:29:46 EDT 2001 sparc unknown (clock is wrong) Date: 7th June 2004 Method: netboot

Re: initrd.list output from build process

Colin Watson wrote: [snip] > > > ./update-manifest $@ $(MANIFEST-INITRD) > > > > You may want to add also > > > > ./update-manifest $(INITRD_LIST) $(MANIFEST-INITRD_LIST) > > I was hoping to avoid that, since I thought that would mean I'd have to > set MANIFEST-INITRD_LIST in all the .cfg

Processed: reassign 253575 to choose-mirror

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 253575 choose-mirror Bug#253575: does not say how to use different port on mirror, has ia64 mirrors Bug reassigned from package `netcfg' to `choose-mirror'. > End of messa

Processing of yaboot-installer_0.0.25_powerpc.changes

yaboot-installer_0.0.25_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: yaboot-installer_0.0.25.dsc yaboot-installer_0.0.25.tar.gz yaboot-installer_0.0.25_powerpc.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

yaboot-installer_0.0.25_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: yaboot-installer_0.0.25.dsc to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_0.0.25.dsc yaboot-installer_0.0.25.tar.gz to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_0.0.25.tar.gz yaboot-installer_0.0.25_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_0.0.25_powerpc

Re: Help! Debian-Installer Dies with various umount errors

If you were blonde, female, and weighed less than 400 lbs I'd kiss you :) Yes, you're 100% right... that's exactly the problem. If you're installing to a hard disk of 100gig or greater, the Beta 4 installer and the Testing Candidate 1 installer will fail, giving you no real error messages, etc.

Processed: tagging 253736

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 253736 d-i Bug#253736: discover1: Tries to remove /media/cdrom0 which fails in d-i - cd is mounted there There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i > End of message, stopping pr

Processed: severity of 253736 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > severity 253736 serious Bug#253736: discover1: Tries to remove /media/cdrom0 which fails in d-i - cd is mounted there Severity set to `serious'. > End of message, stopping process

Processed: severity of 253736 is serious, tagging 253736

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > severity 253736 serious Bug#253736: discover1: Tries to remove /media/cdrom0 which fails in d-i - cd is mounted there Severity set to `serious'. > tags 253736 d-i Bug#253736: disc

  1   2   >