On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 08:31:46PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> # The busybox-cvs udeb is included as a workaround for the broken
> # busybox-cvs-net-udeb. Should be reverted when it works again.
> # XXX surely it's fixed by now? What was the issue?
> busybox-cvs-udeb
than ask correctly, this is not
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 08:25:57PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> > go away
> I think I must have missed the rest of this conversation...
he criticise many of the fundamental changes i implement within the last
months.
bastian
--
Vulcans believe peace should not depend on force.
fre 2003-10-17 klockan 04.26 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Index: changelog
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/debian-boot/debian-installer/utils/debian/changelog,v
> retrieving revision 1.133
> retrieving revision 1.134
> diff -u -d -r1.133 -r1.134
Op vr 17-10-2003, om 05:00 schreef dann frazier:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 03:24:05AM +0200, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
> > I bought mine at a trade show in belgium. So I can't really give you a
> > good shop to buy it from. It's marked 'tiny disk'. usbview tells me
> > Manufacturer: Prolific
Op vr 17-10-2003, om 10:07 schreef Bastian Blank:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 08:25:57PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> > > go away
> > I think I must have missed the rest of this conversation...
>
> he criticise many of the fundamental changes i implement within the last
> months.
So what? That's p
Op vr 17-10-2003, om 02:38 schreef ulistmon2208:
> unsubscribe
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Wouter Verhelst
Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org
N
> > note that a usb floppy is not usb mass storage - your bios must have
> > support for usb mass storage to boot from the key chain, and this
> > is more rare than supporting usb floppy boot.
>
> Most usb floppy disks have support for a legacy mode, in which the USB
> and the floppy disk together
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 09:28:30PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Hi Goswin,
> > What do I need to do to install Debian on a USB hard drive?
> > And to boot from it?
>
> Some time.
I spent some time this evening to get mine working. :-))
I use debootstrap to create a minimum filesystem. C
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 08:10:14PM +0200, Jure Cuhalev wrote:
> Package: aboot-installer
> Severity: wishlist
>
> This is new/fixed slovenian translation of po-file for aboot-installer
> package
aboot-installer hasn't been uploaded yet so the BTS doesn't know where
to send bug reports, but could
Am Fre, den 17.10.2003 schrieb Christian Perrier um 07:11:
> Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Please react (even for telling me that all this is already planned in
> d-i plans :-))).
To me your proposal sounds like a summary of most i18n issues discussed
here during the last w
Op vr 17-10-2003, om 11:02 schreef Peter 'p2' De Schrijver:
> > > note that a usb floppy is not usb mass storage - your bios must have
> > > support for usb mass storage to boot from the key chain, and this
> > > is more rare than supporting usb floppy boot.
> >
> > Most usb floppy disks have supp
Gosinw, your quota is full, this mail will not reach you :((
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 05:05:08AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I updated my branch (-r mrvn) again and its time for another round of
> testing.
>
> Take note of build/TODO, build/config/main (mirror setup) and
> build/
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:52:09AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op vr 17-10-2003, om 10:07 schreef Bastian Blank:
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 08:25:57PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> > > > go away
> > > I think I must have missed the rest of this conversation...
> >
> > he criticise many of the
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 11:59:36AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op vr 17-10-2003, om 11:02 schreef Peter 'p2' De Schrijver:
> > > > note that a usb floppy is not usb mass storage - your bios must have
> > > > support for usb mass storage to boot from the key chain, and this
> > > > is more rare
Fraser Campbell wrote:
> I do still have syslog output in /var/log/debian-installer/syslog, here's the part
> that I think might be relevant:
> Oct 16 03:44:08 (none) user.notice hw-detect: Trying to load module 'pcnet32'
> Oct 16 03:44:08 (none) user.notice hw-detect: Could not locate driver 'pcne
Chris Tillman wrote:
> Joey has been helping intensively for the last few weeks, (thanks!)
> while Bastian has been helping actively for the past several months
> (thanks, too!). I thought it was probably a little off the mark to lob
> "quit checking in broken code" out there. Which of us has never
debian-installer-utils_0.30.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_0.30.dsc
debian-installer-utils_0.30.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_0.30.tar.gz
(new) di-utils-reboot_0.30_all.udeb standard debian-installer
Reboot
This module pro
Christian Perrier wrote:
> I just finished a general work on french translations for (mostly)
> templates used in d-i.
>
> The goal was, after seeing my first tests of the installer, to get
> some consistency in the various templates and menus shown to the use
> during installation.
>
> During th
brltty-modules-2.4.22-1-386-di_0.6_i386.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/brltty-modules-2.4.22-1-386-di_0.6_i386.udeb
cdrom-modules-2.4.22-1-386-di_0.6_i386.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/cdrom-modules-2.4.22-1-386-di_0.6_i386.udeb
ext3-modules-2.4.22-1-386-di_0.6_i386.udeb
to pool/ma
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I'm with you. I've started to review and fix up the english text of
> > templates of packages I touch.
>
> Would you please document what they should be first?
I think the main ideas were in my first post.
THis was really (c)debconf-centric, so
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:16:00AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 08:10:14PM +0200, Jure Cuhalev wrote:
> > Package: aboot-installer
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > This is new/fixed slovenian translation of po-file for aboot-installer
> > package
>
> aboot-installer hasn't b
Accepted:
floppy-retriever_0.08.dsc
to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_0.08.dsc
floppy-retriever_0.08.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_0.08.tar.gz
floppy-retriever_0.08_all.udeb
to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_0.08_all.udeb
Announcing to
tag 215420 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 22:27:31 +0100
Source: floppy-retriever
Binary: floppy-retriever
Architecture: so
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_0.43_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_0.43_i386.udeb
rootskel-locale_0.43_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-locale_0.43_i386.udeb
rootskel_0.43.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.43.dsc
rootskel_0.43.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/root
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 215420 + fixed
Bug#215420: slovenian PO-file translation for floppy-retriever package
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_0.26_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.26_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.26_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.26_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.26.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.26.dsc
netcfg_0.26.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.26.tar.gz
Announcing
Your message dated Fri, 17 Oct 2003 23:41:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line potato is obsolete and no longer supported
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 17 Oct 2003 23:41:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line potato is obsolete and no longer supported
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 17 Oct 2003 23:41:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line potato is obsolete and no longer supported
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 17 Oct 2003 23:41:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line potato is obsolete and no longer supported
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 17 Oct 2003 23:41:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line potato is obsolete and no longer supported
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 03:10:15AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> [Please Cc: me, as I'm not subscribed to this mailing list.]
>
> I plan to move the ppp package currently in experimental to unstable in
> about two weeks. Since the program has some new features and the build
> system has changed a b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 215582 + pending
Bug#215582: move short descriptions to the bottom in the dialog frontend
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tag 215583 + pending
Bug#215583: crashes on missing default for boolean question
There were no tags set.
Tags ad
debian-installer-utils_0.31.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_0.31.dsc
debian-installer-utils_0.31.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_0.31.tar.gz
(new) di-utils-bootfloppy_0.31_i386.udeb standard debian-installer
Utilities for the
I have verified that it does find orinico_pci, now that it is moved to
the first floppy. eepro100 remains a problem.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Fri, 17 Oct 2003 19:10:18 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of floppy-retriever 0.08
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_0.44_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_0.44_i386.udeb
rootskel-locale_0.44_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-locale_0.44_i386.udeb
rootskel_0.44.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.44.dsc
rootskel_0.44.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/root
Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_0.27_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.27_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.27_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.27_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.27.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.27.dsc
netcfg_0.27.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.27.tar.gz
Announcing
Your message dated Fri, 17 Oct 2003 19:35:54 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Accepted:
archdetect_0.48_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_0.48_i386.udeb
ddetect_0.48.dsc
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.48.dsc
ddetect_0.48.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.48.tar.gz
ethdetect_0.48_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.48_all.udeb
hw-detect-full
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 14:13:41 +0200
Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > Last thing, I'll probably use Branden Robinson's help page to install,
> > but is there any documentation about the new debian-installer? Maybe I
> > can try it and help with a report?
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 211128 212444 212446
Bug#211128: Installer doesn't autoload eepro100
Bug#212444: hardware detect does not find eepro100 and orinoco_pci
Bug#212446: hardware detect does not find eepro100 and orinoco_pci
Merged 211128 212444 212446.
>
End of messa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 211128 d-i
Bug#211128: Installer doesn't autoload eepro100
There were no tags set.
Bug#212444: hardware detect does not find eepro100 and orinoco_pci
Bug#212446: hardware detect does not find eepro100 and orinoco_pci
Tags added: d-i
>
End of messa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 212444 discover wants to use eepro100, only e100 is available in d-i
Bug#212444: hardware detect does not find eepro100 and orinoco_pci
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
D
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 212444 discover-data
Bug#212444: discover wants to use eepro100, only e100 is available in d-i
Bug#211128: Installer doesn't autoload eepro100
Bug#212446: hardware detect does not find eepro100 and orinoco_pci
Bug reassigned from package `ethde
Hi,
could someone please add a module for the daily images to glucks
rsync. Downloading a 57 or 120 MB image every day for testing is
wastefull.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 03:10:15AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > [Please Cc: me, as I'm not subscribed to this mailing list.]
> >
> > I plan to move the ppp package currently in experimental to unstable in
> > about two weeks. Since the program has some
Hi,
I'm currently rearanging the building of debian-installer images. This
results in new names and a larger variety of images to choose from.
Namely there are now 3 types of cdroms:
1. cdrom-boot - just boots in an arch specific manner
2. cdrom-udebs - boot from cdrom and have udebs for d-i on
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gosinw, your quota is full, this mail will not reach you :((
I hate viruses. If I don't fetch my mail every hours the university
mailserver overflows.
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 05:05:08AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > When you build check the out
Hi, I have an Alpha machine (XP1000) currently running woody. I'd like to be
of some help in getting the new installer working properly on this
architecture. How can I best do that? Is now a good time to get involved, or
is it still too early?
I think I have enough time to do test installs and
Neil Roeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, I have an Alpha machine (XP1000) currently running woody. I'd
> like to be of some help in getting the new installer working
> properly on this architecture. How can I best do that? Is now a
> good time to get involved, or is it still too early?
Do
Am Freitag, 17. Oktober 2003 19.30 schrieb Joey Hess:
> > -Boolean templates
> > -the short form is a question which should be kept short. This
> >sometimes needs to make telegraphic-style phrases as french
> >usually uses more room than english
> >
> > -the long form should NOT include
Simon Hürlimann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Freitag, 17. Oktober 2003 19.30 schrieb Joey Hess:
> > I think we need to agree on such stupid stylistic matters as one space
> > or two at the end of a sentence. I have my preferences, but making it
> > consistent is more important.
> +1 for one!
On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 10:49:50AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I'm using rootstrap as an almost in-place replacement for debootsrtap in
> pbuilder. It's working fine as it is; rootstrap is scoped to create
> Debian root filesystem as debootstrap does.
>
> I would consider it to be an added bo
Title: AOL Email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
debian-installer has two problems that need a decision soon:
1. Where will debian-installer images be placed?
We have floppy, cdrom, netboot and hd-install images ranging from
1.4 MB floppies, 5-20MB netboot/hd-install images and 5/20/50MB
cdrom isos. Total 100-150 MB per arch.
I
66 matches
Mail list logo
