Hi,
I have installed Debian potato on a HD that formerly was running Mandrake
7.2. Mandrake wrote the MBR, and LILO was default boot manager. I had a
16MB partition on hda1 where i mounted /boot
When I installed debian potato and mounted hda1 as /boot I was told that
it was impossible to write t
Îêàçàëîñü, ÷òî ýòî èíòåðåñíàÿ
òåìà, íî èíòåðåñíà îíà êàæäîìó ïî ñâîåìó.
Íàïðèìåð, ìåíÿ íè êàêèì îáðàçîì íå èíòåðåñóåò çàðàáîòîê äåíåã ïîäîáíûì îáðàçîì, íó ïðîñòî
ëþáîïûòñòâî çàñòàâèëî ïîñìîòðåòü - «åëêè çåëåíûå», òóò ÷òèâà ÷èòàòü íå ïåðå÷èòàòü, ïðîñòî ïðîëèñòàë, ãëàç
çàöåïèëñÿ çà òàáëè÷êó,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark W. Eichin) writes:
> > Could not chdir to home directory /org/home/eichin: No such file or directory
>
> Ok, that's fixed, now I get:
>
> $ CVS_RSH=ssh CVSROOT=:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/debian-boot cvs co .
> cvs server: Updating .
> cvs server: Updating CVSROOT
> cvs
Ahh, I didn't realize that locking would still work if I avoided that
(I think cvs used to put some global locks in CVSROOT, or something
like that - maybe it was a history file issue...) Also, didn't know
about cvs co "-c" to get a list of valid modules. (Is there a project
page with some conte
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark W. Eichin) writes:
> Ahh, I didn't realize that locking would still work if I avoided that
> (I think cvs used to put some global locks in CVSROOT, or something
> like that - maybe it was a history file issue...) Also, didn't know
> about cvs co "-c" to get a list of vali
At 16:40 +0100 3/4/01, Ethan Benson wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 03:13:10PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
>>
>> "Boot-floppies" isn't the best name for this software.
>>
>
>the replacment for the current `boot-floppies' is called
>debian-installer.
>
Will this Mailing list move to debian-testi
> Read boot-floppies/README-CVS and probably work on the woody branch.
Excellent. Thanks much._Mark_
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The woody branch build-depends on libgd1g-dev. This is potato's
1.7.3-0.1, whereas libgd-dev is woody's 1.8.4-2. Should the
build-depends be changed, or is there a specific reason to stick with
the potato version? diffs follow.
_Mark_ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
re:"- remove rsync mirroring stuff; we get packages as needed apt-get"
as far as I can tell it doesn't play well with a local mirror --
apt-get doesn't actually copy anything in download-only mode... which
makes sense, but breaks this usage :-) I don't see an obvious flag to
change that, look
Repository: base-config/debian
who:joeyh
time: Mon Mar 5 17:53:50 PST 2001
Log Message:
* Needs to have a versioned depend on debconf, since no version of
debconf-tiny supports the seen flag, and older versions of debconf don't,
either.
* Version 0.56 of this pack
Manually using --print-uris to generate symlinks worked ok.
for i in $(apt-get --print-uris --yes -o Dir::State=$PWD/download/state -o
Debug::NoLocking=true -o Dir::Cache=$PWD/download/cache -o
Dir::State::status=$PWD/download/status -o Dir::Etc::SourceList=$PWD/localsources.list
--download-on
Repository: modconf/template
who:joey
time: Mon Mar 5 19:20:08 PST 2001
Log Message:
* Updated Spanish translation (Jordi Mallach)
* Removed bashism because ash doesn't like it. Well, that's nothing
new, right? But even hiding it into some if [] clause is not
apprec
Repository: modconf
who:joey
time: Mon Mar 5 19:20:08 PST 2001
Log Message:
* Updated Spanish translation (Jordi Mallach)
* Removed bashism because ash doesn't like it. Well, that's nothing
new, right? But even hiding it into some if [] clause is not
appreciated by
Repository: modconf/debian
who:joey
time: Mon Mar 5 19:20:08 PST 2001
Log Message:
* Updated Spanish translation (Jordi Mallach)
* Removed bashism because ash doesn't like it. Well, that's nothing
new, right? But even hiding it into some if [] clause is not
apprecia
Repository: modconf/debian
who:joey
time: Mon Mar 5 19:32:16 PST 2001
Log Message:
* Umh... somehow there was .32 already, even though I checked the cvs
diff it didn't look like it was uploaded already. Will have to bump
up the version number.
* Whil I'm at it, I've
Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 07:32:16PM -0800 wrote:
> Repository: modconf/debian
> who:joey
> time: Mon Mar 5 19:32:16 PST 2001
>
>
> Log Message:
That was me, I uploaded .32 after removing the bash'ism. Then there was so much
discussion about how it should be fixed that I backed away.
documentation/{cs,hr,fr}/dbootstrap.sgml all still use
&Choose-Debian-archive-path; while the main tree (and the entity
definitions that the translations include) appears to have switched to
&Select-Debian-Archive-path;
I've patched mine locally to let the build proceed; should I send
patches, o
> Right now, busybox init doesn't work with devfs. I have not
> looked into what changes are needed to make it work. I agree
> though, that if we do go this route, we really want to avoid
> the cost of devfsd,
>
bustbox 0.49pre-1 init does work with devfs, at least everything I've seen so
far
Repository: debian-installer/rootskel/src/etc/init.d
who:dwhedon
time: Mon Mar 5 23:20:12 PST 2001
Log Message:
changes to work with devfs
Files:
changed:rcS
removed:makedevs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Repository: debian-installer/rootskel/src
who:dwhedon
time: Mon Mar 5 23:20:12 PST 2001
Log Message:
changes to work with devfs
Files:
removed:linuxrc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Repository: debian-installer/rootskel/src/etc
who:dwhedon
time: Mon Mar 5 23:20:12 PST 2001
Log Message:
changes to work with devfs
Files:
changed:inittab
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
21 matches
Mail list logo
